50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tissue Engineering for the Insertions of Tendons and Ligaments: An Overview of Electrospun Biomaterials and Structures

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The musculoskeletal system is composed by hard and soft tissue. These tissues are characterized by a wide range of mechanical properties that cause a progressive transition from one to the other. These material gradients are mandatory to reduce stress concentrations at the junction site. Nature has answered to this topic developing optimized interfaces, which enable a physiological transmission of load in a wide area over the junction. The interfaces connecting tendons and ligaments to bones are called entheses, while the ones between tendons and muscles are named myotendinous junctions. Several injuries can affect muscles, bones, tendons, or ligaments, and they often occur at the junction sites. For this reason, the main aim of the innovative field of the interfacial tissue engineering is to produce scaffolds with biomaterial gradients and mechanical properties to guide the cell growth and differentiation. Among the several strategies explored to mimic these tissues, the electrospinning technique is one of the most promising, allowing to generate polymeric nanofibers similar to the musculoskeletal extracellular matrix. Thanks to its extreme versatility, electrospinning has allowed the production of sophisticated scaffolds suitable for the regeneration of both the entheses and the myotendinous junctions. The aim of this review is to analyze the most relevant studies that applied electrospinning to produce scaffolds for the regeneration of the enthesis and the myotendinous junction, giving a comprehensive overview on the progress made in the field, in particular focusing on the electrospinning strategies to produce these scaffolds and their mechanical, in vitro, and in vivo outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references127

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size.

            Tissue engineering applications commonly encompass the use of three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds to provide a suitable microenvironment for the incorporation of cells or growth factors to regenerate damaged tissues or organs. These scaffolds serve to mimic the actual in vivo microenvironment where cells interact and behave according to the mechanical cues obtained from the surrounding 3D environment. Hence, the material properties of the scaffolds are vital in determining cellular response and fate. These 3D scaffolds are generally highly porous with interconnected pore networks to facilitate nutrient and oxygen diffusion and waste removal. This review focuses on the various fabrication techniques (e.g., conventional and rapid prototyping methods) that have been employed to fabricate 3D scaffolds of different pore sizes and porosity. The different pore size and porosity measurement methods will also be discussed. Scaffolds with graded porosity have also been studied for their ability to better represent the actual in vivo situation where cells are exposed to layers of different tissues with varying properties. In addition, the ability of pore size and porosity of scaffolds to direct cellular responses and alter the mechanical properties of scaffolds will be reviewed, followed by a look at nature's own scaffold, the extracellular matrix. Overall, the limitations of current scaffold fabrication approaches for tissue engineering applications and some novel and promising alternatives will be highlighted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Skeletal muscle: a brief review of structure and function.

              Skeletal muscle is one of the most dynamic and plastic tissues of the human body. In humans, skeletal muscle comprises approximately 40% of total body weight and contains 50-75% of all body proteins. In general, muscle mass depends on the balance between protein synthesis and degradation and both processes are sensitive to factors such as nutritional status, hormonal balance, physical activity/exercise, and injury or disease, among others. In this review, we discuss the various domains of muscle structure and function including its cytoskeletal architecture, excitation-contraction coupling, energy metabolism, and force and power generation. We will limit the discussion to human skeletal muscle and emphasize recent scientific literature on single muscle fibers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
                Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-4185
                02 March 2021
                2021
                : 9
                : 645544
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Advanced Applications in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Technology – Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research (CIRI-MAM), Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                [3] 3Health Sciences and Technologies – Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research (CIRI-HST), Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jyh-Ping Chen, Chang Gung University, Taiwan

                Reviewed by: Gustavo A. Abraham, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina; Agata Przekora, Medical University of Lublin, Poland

                *Correspondence: Alberto Sensini, alberto.sensini2@ 123456unibo.it

                This article was submitted to Biomaterials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

                Article
                10.3389/fbioe.2021.645544
                7961092
                33738279
                7e6a3c23-1361-46d9-9add-280abb3cd8a9
                Copyright © 2021 Sensini, Massafra, Gotti, Zucchelli and Cristofolini.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 December 2020
                : 27 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 127, Pages: 23, Words: 0
                Categories
                Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Review

                electrospinning,enthesis,myotendinous junction,scaffolds,scaffolds biofabrication,cell cultures,in vivo tests,mechanical behavior

                Comments

                Comment on this article