32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Retroperitoneal fibrosis—the long and winding path

      case-report
      , MBChB 1 , , MBBS 2 , , MBChB 1 , , MRCS, FRCR 1 , , , FRCR 1 , , MRCP, PhD 3
      BJR | case reports
      The British Institute of Radiology.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare systemic disease. Two-third of the cases are idiopathic but assumed to have autoimmune process related to IgG-4. It is often a diagnosis of exclusion due to its non-specific clinical presentation. Early manifestation commonly causes back pain, raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate level and renal impairment. Investigations of choice are MRI and contrast-enhanced CT but biopsy should be performed for diagnostic confirmation. This case report describes a delay in diagnosing RPF in a 57-year-old female who initially presented to primary care with back pain, mild anaemia, raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate and progressive renal function decline. She was seen urgently in haematology clinic who arranged bone scan to rule out osteoblastic metastases, finding demonstrated possible pelviureteric junction dysfunction. The investigation was followed by a MAG3 renogram 4 weeks later instead of an abdominal CT leading to diagnostic delay. She then presented acutely 1 day after renogram with life-threatening hyperkalaemia and AKI 3. RPF was then suspected. Renal ultrasound scan and CT scan consecutively showed bilateral gross hydronephrosis and retroperitoneal mass around the aorta. The pelviureteric junction dysfunction was due to ureters getting embedded into the dense retroperitoneal fibrous tissue. She subsequently underwent bilateral ureteric stent placement and was commenced on steroid therapy, with satisfactory outcome on follow-up. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal biopsy later confirmed the diagnosis. This case not only highlighted important learning points on the presenting features and radiographic findings of RPF, but also the clinician’s cognitive biases leading to diagnostic delay of a rare but life-threatening disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Retroperitoneal fibrosis: a review of clinical features and imaging findings.

          Retroperitoneal fibrosis is a rare collagen vascular disorder of unclear cause. Both benign and malignant associations have been described, rendering differentiation of these entities of paramount importance because sinister pathology alters the diagnosis. Thus, a high level of diligence is required in the investigation of this condition, particularly in patients with concomitant systemic conditions. Familiarity with the realm of imaging manifestations of retroperitoneal fibrosis is vital to ensure correct diagnosis and optimal treatment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Asbestos exposure as a risk factor for retroperitoneal fibrosis.

            Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is an uncommon disease with unknown causation in most cases. The pathognomonic finding is a fibrous mass covering the abdominal aorta and the ureters. Our aim was to clarify the possible role of asbestos exposure in the development of RPF. The hypothesis was based on the ability of asbestos to cause fibrosis in pulmonary and pleural tissue. We undertook a case-control study of 43 patients with the disease (86% of eligible cases) treated in three university hospital districts of Finland in 1990-2001. For every patient, five population-based controls were selected, matched by age, sex, and central hospital district. We assessed asbestos exposure and medical history using a postal questionnaire and a personal interview. Of the 215 eligible controls, 179 (83%) participated in the study. The age-standardised incidence of RPF was 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.14) per 100?000 person-years. The disease was strongly associated with asbestos exposure. The odds ratio (OR) was 5.54 (1.64-18.65) for less than 10 fibre-years of asbestos exposure and 8.84 (2.03-38.50) for 10 or more fibre-years, the attributable fraction being 82% and 89%, respectively. Other risk factors were previous use of ergot derivates (OR 9.92 [1.63-60.26]), abdominal aortic aneurysm (OR 6.73 [0.81-56.08]), and smoking for more than 20 pack-years (OR 4.73 [1.28-17.41]). Our results show that occupational asbestos exposure is an important causal factor for RPF. For patients with work-related asbestos exposure, RPF should be considered an occupational disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              CT findings of lymphoma with peritoneal, omental and mesenteric involvement: peritoneal lymphomatosis.

              We aimed to describe computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with peritoneal, omental and mesenteric lymphoma involvement. We searched our archive retrospectively to find out patients with peritoneal, omental and mesenteric lymphoma involvement. We found 16 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma meeting these criteria. CT studies of these patients were reevaluated for the presence of peritoneal involvement, ascites, omental mass, organomegaly, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, bowel wall thickening and other associated findings. There were 14 males and 2 females with peritoneal and/or mesenteric and omental lymphoma involvement. Mean age was 39 (range 4-76). Subgroups of non-Hodgkin lymphoma were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=11), small cell lymphocytic lymphoma (n=2), small cleaved cell lymphoma (n=1), T-cell lymphoma (n=1) and Burkitt's lymphoma (n=1). Peritoneal involvement was seen in 15 patients (93.8%) in the form of linear (n=12) and nodular (n=3) thickening. Ascites was seen in 12 (75%) patients. Omental and mesenteric masses were present in 10 (66.6%) and 10 (66.6%) patients, respectively. Bowel wall thickening, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly were also common and observed in 10, 10 and 11 patients, respectively. Solid organ involvement in the form of liver and splenic lesions was seen in 9 (56%) patients. Peritoneal involvement can be seen in many subtypes of lymphoma and most frequently in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Peritoneal lymphomatosis can mimic peritoneal carcinomatosis and should be included in the differential diagnosis list in patients with ascites, hepatosplenic lesions and unidentified cause of peritoneal thickening on CT in a male patient.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                BJR Case Rep
                British Institute of Radiology
                bjrcr
                BJR | case reports
                The British Institute of Radiology.
                2055-7159
                September 2020
                29 September 2020
                : 6
                : 2
                : 20190086
                Affiliations
                [1 ]org-divisionDepartment of Radiology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals , NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
                [2 ]org-divisionDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals , NHS Foundation Trust, City, United Kingdom
                [3 ]org-divisionDepartment of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals , NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Miss Bella Huasen. E-mail: Doctorbella.h@ 123456googlemail.com
                Article
                BJRCR-D-19-00086
                10.1259/bjrcr.20190086
                7527001
                7e6f14a8-7e11-4bb4-af26-bec18f7f5a2b
                © 2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 02 August 2019
                : 21 November 2019
                : 25 November 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 12, Pages: 0, Words: 3358
                Categories
                Case Report
                bjrcr, BJRCR
                gas-abd, Gastrointestinal and abdominal
                gen-trct, Genitourinary tract
                nuc-med, Nuclear medicine
                med-phy-diag, Medical physics: diagnostic
                ct, CT
                mri, MRI
                ult, Ultrasound

                Comments

                Comment on this article