12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Physical Activity Recommendations during COVID-19: Narrative Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Regular practice of physical activity plays a fundamental role in preventing and treating cardiovascular diseases such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. During the pandemic caused by COVID-19 and the lockdown established, people have reduced considerably their mobility and motor activity, which has led to an increase in unhealthy lifestyle habits, raising the risk of suffering from diseases. This paper consists of reviewing the existing scientific literature on recommendations of physical activity during the pandemic and to establish specific guidelines according to the type of population to which the activity would be directed. A search strategy has been carried out in the different databases: Embase, PubMed, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science (WoS), including all the articles published until 14 May 2020, to find essays with recommendations on aerobic activity, muscle strengthening, flexibility-stretching, meditation-relaxation, and balance exercises. The articles found have been evaluated considering the following criteria: type of publication, proposals for physical exercise, language, and, if it appears, volume of activity, frequency, intensity, and rest. The results obtained 29 articles that discuss patterns of physical activity, although there is no common consensus on such recommendations during confinement, nor are they suitable for all people. From these results, we can conclude that physical activity is widely recommended during the confinement caused by COVID-19, mainly through the performance of aerobic, strength, flexibility, and balance exercises.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Wuhan coronavirus (2019-nCoV): The need to maintain regular physical activity while taking precautions

          The on-going Wuhan coronavirus (2019-novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV) outbreak in China has become the world's leading health headline and is causing major panic and public concerns. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the new coronavirus outbreak is a public health emergency of international concern. 1 The virus has already had a direct impact on more than 10 million people in the city of Wuhan and has reached other parts of China as well, posing a health threat of unknown magnitude globally. As of February 8, 2020, WHO reported 34,886 confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV globally, with 34,589 of them occurring in China (including 6101 severe cases and 723 deaths). A total of 288 other confirmed cases (with 1 death) have been reported in 24 countries, including Japan, Australia, Germany, and United States. 2 However, these daily estimates are expected to rise even higher as reports from health authorities in China 3 are gathered and near real-time updates of the Johns Hopkins virus dashboard are made. 4 The outbreak has caused governments in various countries to take swift and protective measures. In China, these included putting cities on lockdown, 5 implementing travel warnings/bans and cancellations, 6 extending national holidays, and closing schools and postponing classes. 7 Currently, there is no vaccine for the prevention or treatment of the illness caused by the virus; its origins and the ultimate extent of this epidemic remain unknown. There have been more than 50 research papers published within the last 20 days 8 that have allowed for the rapid sharing of scientific information about the virus, but serious questions regarding the causes or mechanisms of transmission, incubation period, risk assessments, and options for effective treatment or intervention of the virus remain largely unanswered. 9 There have been reports of significant shortages of medical staff, a lack of clinics that can handle and treat infected patients, and high demands for face masks for protection. The Chinese central government is working with extraordinary diligence to mobilize resources, including building new hospitals and developing new coronavirus vaccine, as well as sending medical experts and clinicians to the city of Wuhan 10 to help contain the highly transmittable virus outbreak from spreading further. With the continuing coronavirus spur, the public has been advised by various health authorities to reduce traveling and stay at home as a basic means of limiting people's exposure to the virus. Health authorities, including the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, 11 WHO, 12 and U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 13 have issued safety recommendations for taking simple precautions to reduce exposure to and transmission of the virus. Unfortunately, the mandated restrictions on travel and directives against participating in outdoor activities, including regular physical activity and exercise, will inevitably disrupt the routine daily activities of tens of millions of people. While containing the virus as quickly as possible is the urgent public health priority, there have been few public health guidelines for the public as to what people can or should do in terms of maintaining their daily exercise or physical activity routines. Arguably, staying home, while a safe measure, may have unintended negative consequences since such efforts to avoid human-to-human transmission of the virus may lead to reduced physical activity. It is likely that prolonged home stay may lead to increased sedentary behaviors, such as spending excessive amounts of time sitting, reclining, or lying down for screening activities (playing games, watching television, using mobile devices); reducing regular physical activity (hence lower energy expenditure); or engaging in avoidance activities that, consequently, lead to an increased risk for and potential worsening of chronic health conditions. 14 Therefore, there is a strong health rationale for continuing physical activity in the home to stay healthy and maintain immune system function in the current precarious environment. Exercise at home using various safe, simple, and easily implementable exercises is well suited to avoid the airborne coronavirus and maintain fitness levels. Such forms of exercise may include, but are not limited to, strengthening exercises, activities for balance and control, stretching exercises, or a combination of these. Examples of home exercises include walking in the house and to the store as necessary, lifting and carrying groceries, alternating leg lunges, stair climbing, stand-to-sit and sit-to-stand using a chair and from the floor, chair squats, and sit-ups and pushups. In addition, traditional Tai Ji Quan, Qigong exercises, 15 and yoga 16 should be considered since they require no equipment, little space, and can be practiced at any time. The use of eHealth and exercise videos, which focuses on encouraging and delivering physical activity through the Internet, mobile technologies, and television 17 are other viable avenues for maintaining physical function and mental health during this critical period. Official measures that restrict people's movements in the presence of the coronavirus crisis do not necessarily mean that physical activity must be limited or that all forms of exercise must be eliminated entirely. Exercise has been shown to have clear health benefits for healthy individuals 18 and for patients with various diseases. 19 In this respect, we strongly echo Dr. Steven Blair's quote from Dr. Ken Powell: “Some activity is better than none, and more is better than less” (p. 525). 20 The aim should be to undertake at least 30 min of moderate physical activity every day and/or at least 20 min of vigorous physical activity every other day. 18 Ideally, a combination of both intensities of physical activities is preferable in addition to practicing strengthening-type activities on a regular basis. 18 Children, the elderly, and those who have previously experienced symptoms of illness or are susceptible to chronic cardiovascular or pulmonary disease should seek advice from health care providers about when it is safe to exercise. Given the concerns about the increasing spread of 2019-nCoV, it is imperative that infection control and safety precautions be followed. Home stay is a fundamental safety step that can limit infections from spreading widely. But prolonged home stays can increase behaviors that lead to inactivity and contribute to anxiety and depression, which in turn can lead to a sedentary lifestyle known to result in a range of chronic health conditions. Maintaining regular physical activity and routinely exercising in a safe home environment is an important strategy for healthy living during the coronavirus crisis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Physical exercise as therapy to fight against the mental and physical consequences of COVID-19 quarantine: Special focus in older people ☆

            The Coronavirus (Covid-19) was introduced this past December 2019 in China (Wuhan) and the infection has spread throughout the world despite strategies adopted by the Chinese government to stop this epidemiological phenomenon. Three months later, Covid-19 has become a worldwide pandemic with more than 353,000 cases confirmed on March 23th 2020, 15,000 deaths and more than 100,000 recovered around the world. The evolution of this pandemic can be followed at different official websites, such as the interactive web-based dashboard to track Covid-19 in real time developed by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (https://www.eficiens.com/coronavirus-statistics/) or the HealthMap provided by the Boston Children's Hospital (https://www.healthmap.org/Covid-19/ ). Additionally, the New England Journal of Medicine provides free access for a collection of articles and other resources on the Covid-19 outbreak, including clinical reports, management guidelines, and commentaries (https://www.nejm.org/coronavirus?cid=DM88311&bid=165326853). Actually, China has managed to stop the number of daily infections for several days. The next two countries to suffer the most intense impact of the pandemic were Italy and Spain, having already exceeded, in the case of Italy, the number of total deaths reached by China. However, many other countries around the world, including the United States, are developing new cases at alarming rates. Most of the epidemiological experts agree that much of the success in containing the virus in China and elsewhere has been due to rapid measures adopted by the authorities to impose quarantine status for the majority of population. Therefore, many of the most seriously affected countries after China, such as Italy and Spain, adopted similar strategies several weeks later. In addition, based on the worldwide information from the Covid-19 pandemic, some characteristics of the population at higher risk for Covid-19 have been identified, such as being older people, those with hypertension, diabetes or cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and CVD, and patients with respiratory diseases or conditions. On the one hand, despite that a period of quarantine is the best option and recommendation to stop the rapid spread infections, this may have collateral effects on other dimensions of the isolated patients´ health, and especially in those mentioned as being at higher risk. Initiating a sudden quarantine state implies a radical change in the lifestyle of the population. These lifestyles and behaviors in many cases include a certain level of physical activity (PA) and exercise to maintain an adequate health status, 1 to counteract the negative consequences of certain diseases, 2 such as diabetes, hypertension, CVD, respiratory diseases, or even simply to guarantee an active aging by reducing the risk of frailty, sarcopenia and dementia, as associated diseases in older people. 3 , 4 Moreover, the psychological impact of quarantine has been recently reviewed 5 and negative psychological effects, including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger has been reported. The stressor factors suggested included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. On the other hand, PA and exercise have shown to be an effective therapy for most of the chronic diseases with direct effects on both mental and physical health.1., 2., 3., 4. , 6., 7., 8., 9. In fact, exercise has been considered the real polypill based on epidemiological evidence of its preventive/therapeutic benefits and considering the main biological mediators involved. 1 , 7 , 9 Special attention is deserved for the elderly population group, because in older people PA and exercise impact the mentioned benefits on many diseases but also has additional effects on hallmarks of aging and associated diseases. 10 In this sense, exercise in older people positively affects and prevents frailty, sarcopenia/dynapenia, risk of falls, self-esteem and cognitive impairment or decline. 10 , 11 Therefore, to not totally interrupt or change the lifestyle of people during quarantine and to maintain an active lifestyle at home is very important for the health of the overall population but, especially, for those with additional risk factors and older people. Although outdoor activities are typically more available, varied, and have more facilities and infrastructures to perform any type of physical exercise, there still are many possibilities for exercising at home during a quarantine. Clearly, we would support the message of “doing at least some exercise is better than nothing”, however, a more precise prescription and recommendation are needed to guarantee an appropriate exercise program aimed to maintain or improve the principal health-related physical fitness components. Briefly, the reason to promote PA and exercise for improving physical fitness components is that these (cardiorespiratory fitness or CRF, muscular strength, coordination-agility) are directly related with the physiological functions of the main organ systems (respiratory, circulatory, muscular, nervous and skeletal systems) and indirectly implicated in the appropriate functioning of other systems (endocrine, digestive, immune or renal systems).1., 2., 3., 4. , 7 , 9 These relationships are even more interesting from the point of view of physiologic functional reserve of organ systems, for example, to increase the CRF is not only directly related with improvements in the circulatory and respiratory systems capacities but also with increases in its functional reserve. For all this, PA/exercise become especially essential for older people during quarantine because to maintain physiological function and reserve of most of the organ systems could contribute to the fight against the mental and physical consequences and severity of Covid-19 (Fig 1 ). Fig 1 illustrates how physical exercise enhances the health of older people by acting on the different organ systems. Fig 1 The principal elements we should consider to design a proper exercise program for older people confined at home are exercise modality, frequency of practice, volume and intensity (among others). Exercise modality A multicomponent exercise program is considered the most adequate for older people 10 , 11 from both settings of free-living and community-dwelling. A multicomponent exercise program includes aerobic, resistance, balance, coordination and mobility training exercises. Recently, some researchers have also suggested to integrate the concept of cognitive training during the exercise training session. Exercise frequency The international guidelines of PA for older people recommend 5 days per week, which in this particular quarantine situation could be increased to 5–7 days per week with adaptation in volume and intensity. Exercise volume The guidelines recommend at least 150 to 300 min per week of aerobic exercise and 2 resistance training sessions per week. Under the quarantine it could be suggested to increase to 200–400 min per week distributed among 5–7 days to compensate for the decrease in the normal daily PA levels. Moreover, a minimum of 2–3 days per week of resistance exercise could be recommended. Mobility training exercises should be performed on all the training days and balance and coordination should be distributed among the different training days (at least twice). Exercise intensity The guidelines suggest moderate intensity for most of the sessions and some amount of vigorous exercise per week. It is well-known that exercise at moderate intensity improves the immune system, but vigorous intensity may even inhibit it, especially in sedentary people. Thus, during quarantine times, moderate intensity (40–60% heart rate reserve or 65–75% of maximal heart rate) should be the ideal choice for older people to enhance the protective role of exercise. Examples of home exercises In case one does not have large equipment or specific materials for training, the following options are available in any house; resistance training through bodyweight exercises such as squats holding a chair, sitting and getting up from the chair or going up and down a step, transporting items with light and moderate weights (vegetables, rice, water, etc), aerobic exercises like walking inside the house, dancing or balance exercise such as walking on a line on the floor, walking on the toes or heels, walking heel-to-toe, and stepping over obstacles. Statement of conflict of interest There is no conflict of interest of any of the listed authors. Funding Current research activities of DJP are supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation - MINECO (RYC-2014-16938) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness – MINECO/FEDER (DEP2016-76123-R); the Government of Andalusian, Integrated Territorial Initiative 2014–2020 for the province of Cádiz (PI-0002-2017); the European Union's ERASMUS+SPORT programme (grant agreement: 603121-EPP-1-2018-1-ES-SPO-SCP); and the EXERNET Research Network on Exercise and Health in Special Populations (DEP2005-00046/ACTI).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A tale of two pandemics: How will COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect one another?

              The world is experiencing an extraordinary, life-altering challenge due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 1 Many countries have become accustomed to a new normal – “social distancing” 2 and “shelter in place” 3 are now a part of everyday vernacular and life. It is hard to predict exactly when the COVID-19 pandemic will subside, and communities will return to normal function; it appears it may be some time before that occurs. One thing that we do not currently know is what lasting effects the COVID-19 pandemic will have on behavior patterns once life begins to return to normal. While of a different nature, the world has been living with another pandemic for a number of years – physical inactivity (PI) and sedentary behavior (SB).4., 5., 6. According to the World Health Organization, 31% of individuals 15 years or older are physically inactive and approximately 3.2 million deaths per year are attributed to this unhealthy lifestyle behavior. Ding et al. 7 et al. reported PI conservatively cost healthcare systems around the world $53.8 billion dollars in 2013. Moreover, deaths attributable to PI cost another $13.7 billion in productivity losses and resulted in 13.4 million disability-adjusted life-years globally. Although PI was defined as a pandemic in 2012, 5 and leading organizations have recognized this crisis and have been championing efforts to increase physical activity (PA), 8 , 9 insufficient PA trends continue to persist. 10 , 11 At the current trajectory, Guthold et al. 10 reports the 2025 global PA goal of reducing insufficient PA by 10% will not be met. In this context, all data convincingly indicates the PI pandemic will persist long after we recover from the COVID-19 pandemic - the health and economic impacts of the PI pandemic, for which no end is in sight, will continue to be severe. It is important to note that the aforementioned statistics focus on PI in the context of not meeting recommended PA guidelines (e.g., 150 min or more of moderate intensity PA per week). 12 Increased sitting time/SB, independent of leisure time PA, has also been convincingly shown to be a significant predictor of adverse health outcomes. 13 , 14 It has been estimated that each additional hour of sitting time results in an increase of $126 in annual healthcare costs in older adults. 15 In fact, the 2018 US Physical Activity Guidelines recognize the detrimental impact of prolonged sitting time and note any reduction in SB and increase in physical movement, even below recommended goals, have significant health benefits, and, as such, support the overarching message of sitting less and moving more. 12 Importantly, comparing both adherence to the US Physical Activity Guidelines and sedentary time between 2007–2008 and 2015–2016, Du et al. 11 reported no change in adherence to the PA guidelines but a significant increase in SB. These findings collectively foretell a concerning future where people continue to move less overall and will experience a poorer health trajectory as a result. Perhaps it would be more appropriate at this time to rename the PI pandemic to the sedentarism 16 pandemic. As noted at the outset of this commentary, the lasting effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will not be fully realized for some time. Given the change in daily life for people around the world as a result of COVID-19, we hypothesize this health crisis has the potential to further impact and accelerate the physical PI/SB pandemic we have been confronted with, and failing to address, for a number of years. Many opportunities to be physically active have been suspended, including outpatient cardiac rehabilitation, school-based physical education and athletic programs, fitness centers and public parks; the infrastructure to be physically active, which was not being utilized by a majority of the global population prior to COVID-19, 8 has been significantly diminished. This is compounded by directives to shelter in place and practice social distancing. There is a significant concern that these factors come together to increase the risk of social isolation, which has been shown to negatively impact mental health, PA patterns and sedentary time across the lifespan as well as increase mortality risk in the elderly. 17 In 100,839 male and female Brazilian adolescents, Werneck et al. 18 noted higher levels of physical activity and decreased sitting time were associated with lower social isolation. In another Brazilian adolescent cohort, Pinto et al. 19 found PA and not participating in physical education classes increased loneliness. For adolescents, social interactions and friendships significantly influence PA behaviors, 20 , 21 a factor that has assuredly been negatively impacted by shelter in place and social distancing mandates as a result of COVID-19. The influence of social isolation and unhealthy lifestyle choices within a family unit has also been studied. Thompson et al. 22 found a significant correlation between social isolation and an unhealthier lifestyle in parents with adolescent children, which also negatively influenced lifestyle behaviors of their adolescent children. Robins et al. 23 found higher levels of household PA to be associated with lower levels of social isolation in community-dwelling older adults. Schrempft et al. 24 likewise reported time spent in SB was significantly higher and time spent participating in moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA was significantly lower in men and women aged 50 to 81 years who reported being socially isolated compared to those who reported not being isolated. The question must be asked – is COVID-19 making the world move even less than before? Given the significant blow COVID-19 has delivered to the ability for people to leave their homes and engage in regular activities (e.g., school, work, fitness facilities) and utilize community resources (e.g., parks, playgrounds, walking trails), the answer to this question is most certainly yes. If the answer to the first question is yes, the next question becomes will these increased SB persist and become the new societal norms? We are not aware of any available literature that has assessed the lasting effect of pandemics on PA and SB. However, previous research has assessed the lasting impact of natural disasters on PA. Following the 2011 earthquake and tsunami that devastated East Japan, Okazaki et al. 25 reported a lasting significant decrease in PA in children and adolescents over three years following the disaster. Similar research must be conducted after we recover from the COVID-19 pandemic to determine the lasting impact this global crisis may have on PA patterns and sedentary time. There are efforts to help individuals be physically active during COVID-19 that should be applauded. The American College of Sports Medicine has released information on how to remain active during COVID-19. 26 Numerous fitness centers have also been posting free online workout routines to help people remain active at home. 27 , 28 Leading health and wellness journalists have also been stressing the importance of continuing to move during COVID-19, 29 noting recent research that taking as little as 4000 steps per day at any pace, which you can do around your house, significantly improves long-term health. 30 Lastly, world renowned exercise and physical activity scholars are also beginning to publish on this topic. 31 While these are certainly positive efforts that must continue, concern remains that individuals who were not previously engaged in a regular exercise routine and led a sedentary lifestyle will not be likely to increase their daily PA during COVID-19 and, in fact, may be moving even less. Bauer et al. 32 highlighted US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention strategies to combat PI including: “1) epidemiology and surveillance to monitor trends and inform programs; 2) environmental approaches that promote health and support healthy behaviors; 3) health system interventions to improve the effective use of clinical and other preventive services; and 4) community resources linked to clinical services that sustain improved management of chronic conditions. Establishment of community conditions to support healthy behaviors and promote effective management of chronic conditions will deliver healthier students to schools, healthier workers to employers and businesses, and a healthier population to the health-care system.” As allowable, components of these strategies should be employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, promoting PA and sitting less while abiding by shelter in place and social distancing recommendations. Once the COVID-19 pandemic has subsided, these strategies should be employed with a renewed vigor to increase PA and decrease SB. 33 To this point, we have discussed the potential detrimental impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on PA behaviors and SB. It is important to note that we may also be at risk for a viscous cycle where current and potentially accelerated PI patterns and sedentary behaviors may worsen the impact of future pandemics. Not surprisingly, individuals infected with COVID-19 are much more likely to be hospitalized and have poorer health outcomes if underlying medical conditions, such as one or more chronic disease diagnoses, are present. 34 Moreover, the evidence linking a significantly higher increased risk for chronic disease if you are physically inactive and lead a sedentary lifestyle is beyond dispute. 32 , 35 , 36 The intersection between current risks for health complications and mortality rates associated with COVID-19 and the current state of PI and SB cannot be ignored. If the prevalence of chronic conditions brought about by unhealthy lifestyles were lower, would the catastrophic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic be lessened? In conclusion, we are currently confronted with two pandemics occurring at the same time. The world will recover from the COVID-19 pandemic and so-called normal activities will resume. However, the PI/SB pandemic will continue and, more troublingly, we may be at risk for this pandemic to worsen as a result of COVID-19. As a global society, we simply cannot let this happen. Aggressive efforts need to be taken to get people physically moving again after COVID-19 – at an absolute minimum we need to hold the line. However, we should take this opportunity to learn valuable lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic; in particular, how aggressively the world altered societal norms to decrease the spread of this viral infection. Perhaps the world will realize a similar aggressiveness is needed to treat the PI/SB pandemic, improving health outcomes under normal conditions and improving humankind's resiliency during future pandemics. Statement of conflict of interest None of the authors have any conflicts of interests with regard to this publication.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                24 December 2020
                January 2021
                : 18
                : 1
                : 65
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratorio de Biomecánica y Análisis del Movimiento del Litoral, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Florida 1065, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay; patricia.polero@ 123456gmail.com
                [2 ]Health, Economy, Motricity and Education Research Group (HEME), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain; jadssal@ 123456unex.es (J.C.A.); jorgepg100@ 123456unex.es (J.P.-G.); jorgerr@ 123456unex.es (J.R.-R.); fmanzanoa@ 123456alumnos.unex.es (F.M.-R.); jorge.carlosvivas@ 123456gmail.com (J.C.-V.)
                [3 ]Facultad de Administración y Negocios, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Sede Talca 3467987, Chile; miguelgarciagordillo@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7203-3168
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-9132
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6542-7828
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-264X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1736-0996
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6377-9950
                Article
                ijerph-18-00065
                10.3390/ijerph18010065
                7796360
                33374109
                7ec4a981-725e-433c-b77c-da12214bad46
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 09 October 2020
                : 27 November 2020
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                coronavirus,pandemic,physical exercise,physically inactivity,health
                Public health
                coronavirus, pandemic, physical exercise, physically inactivity, health

                Comments

                Comment on this article