69
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    12
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Atypical clinical presentation of a subset of patients with anti-RNA polymerase III - non-scleroderma cases associated with dominant RNA polymerase I reactivity and nucleolar staining

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Anti-RNA polymerase III (RNAP III) antibodies are highly specific markers of scleroderma (systemic sclerosis, SSc) and associated with a rapidly progressing subset of SSc. The clinical presentation of anti-RNAP III positive patients, onset of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and SSc in unselected patients in a rheumatology clinic were evaluated.

          Methods

          Autoantibodies in sera from 1,966 unselected patients (including 434 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 119 SSc, 85 polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM)) in a rheumatology clinic were screened by radioimmunoprecipitation. Anti-RNAP III positive sera were also tested by immunofluorescence antinuclear antibodies and anti-RNAP III ELISA. Medical records of anti-RNAP III positive patients were reviewed.

          Results

          Among 21 anti-RNAP III positive patients, 16 met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SSc criteria at the initial visit but 5 did not; diagnoses were vasculitis, early polyarthritis, renal failure with RP, interstitial lung disease, and Sjögren's syndrome. The first two patients developed rapidly progressive diffuse SSc. An additional case presented with diffuse scleroderma without RP and RP developed two years later. Anti-RNAP III antibodies in these 6 cases of atypical clinical presentation were compared with those in 15 cases of typical (SSc with RP) cases. Anti-RNAP III levels by ELISA were lower in the former group ( P = 0.04 by Mann-Whitney test) and 3 of 6 were negative versus only 1 of 15 negative in the latter ( P < 0.05 by Fisher's exact test). Three cases of non-SSc anti-RNAP III positive patients had predominant reactivity with RNAP I with weak RNAP III reactivity and had a strong nucleolar staining. Three anti-RNAP III patients, who did not have RP at the initial visit, developed RP months later. Scleroderma developed prior to RP in 5 out of 16 (31%) in the anti-RNAP III group, but this was rare in patients with other autoantibodies. The interval between the onset of RP to scleroderma was short in anti-RNAP III positive patients.

          Conclusions

          Anti-RNAP III antibodies are highly specific for SSc; however, a subset of anti-RNAP III positive patients do not present as typical SSc. The interval between RP and scleroderma in this group is short, and 31% of patients developed scleroderma prior to RP in this group. Anti-RNAP III positive patients may not present as typical SSc and detecting anti-RNAP III may have predictive value.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Emerging complexity of microRNA generation cascades.

          MicroRNA (miRNA) modules are built in genetic networks as a complex regulatory layer directing post-transcriptional gene regulation. miRNAs coordinate a broad spectra of gene expression programs mainly through modulation of mRNA metabolism. Perturbations of miRNA networks are linked to a wide variety of pathological processes, including cardiovascular diseases and cancer. While the mechanisms regulating miRNA biogenesis were previously poorly understood, recent findings have shed light on the regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs themselves, especially their biogenesis. Multiple steps of miRNA maturation could potentially provide a variety of regulatory options to generate mature miRNAs differentially and produce gradation in miRNA processing efficiency. Several studies have demonstrated that miRNA maturation pathways crosstalk with intracellular signalling molecules, including p53, Smad proteins and estrogen receptor. Other lines of evidence have demonstrated the involvement of multiple RNA binding proteins in biased processing of different miRNA species. This review summarizes accumulating evidence for the emerging complexity and dynamics of regulated miRNA processing. These findings will lead to better understanding of miRNA dynamics in various pathogenetic pathways and provide the molecular basis for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies based on small RNA biology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The many faces of scleroderma.

            Scleroderma autoantibodies are associated with very specific demographic, clinical, organ system, and survival features. The use of scleroderma autoantibodies may be very helpful in determining the prognosis, as well as monitoring and treatment of scleroderma patients. There are many faces of scleroderma that seem to be closely associated with scleroderma autoantibodies. These antibodies should be used in performing clinical trials and in doing genetic and basic research. Hopefully, these scleroderma antibodies will lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of scleroderma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical interpretation of antinuclear antibody tests in systemic rheumatic diseases.

              Autoantibody tests have been used extensively in diagnosis and follow-up of patients in rheumatology clinics. Immunofluorescent antinuclear antibody test using HEp-2 cells is still considered the gold standard for screening of autoantibodies, and most of specific autoantibodies are currently tested by ELISA as a next step. Among the many autoantibody specificities described, some have been established as clinically useful diagnostic markers and are included in the classification criteria of diseases. Despite a long history of routine tests and attempts to standardize such assays, there are still limitations and problems that clinicians need to be aware of. Clinicians should be able to use autoantibody tests more efficiently and effectively with a basic knowledge on the significance of and potential problems in autoantibody tests.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arthritis Res Ther
                Arthritis Research & Therapy
                BioMed Central
                1478-6354
                1478-6362
                2011
                22 July 2011
                : 13
                : 4
                : R119
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Oral Biology, University of Florida, 1395 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610-0424, USA
                [2 ]Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610-0221, USA
                [3 ]INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., 9900 Old Grove Road, San Diego, CA, 92131-1638, USA
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610-0221, USA
                Article
                ar3422
                10.1186/ar3422
                3239357
                21781293
                7ecf8ea3-7b60-4ba7-8416-4a7bafae2a8b
                Copyright ©2011 Ceribelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 March 2011
                : 24 May 2011
                : 22 July 2011
                Categories
                Research Article

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article