18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Comparative Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Results between the Upper and Lower Lumbar Disc Herniations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          There are differences in the clinical characteristics and surgical results between upper (L1-2 and L2-3) and lower (L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1) lumbar disc herniations. We conducted this study to compare the clinical features and surgical outcomes between the two types of lumbar disc herniations.

          Methods

          We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features of patients who underwent microdiscectomies from 2008 to 2012. We evaluated the clinical characteristics such as age, preoperative autonomic dysfunction, the presence or absence of previous lumbar surgery and fusion required during surgery. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores about back pain and leg pain were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up.

          Results

          Upper lumbar group (n=15) was significantly older than lower lumbar group (n=148). The incidence of autonomic dysfunction was significantly higher in upper lumbar group. The number of patients with a previous lumbar surgery was significantly greater in upper lumbar group. There was no statistical significance for fusion required during surgery between two groups. Both groups showed a significant decrease in the VAS scores of leg pain. VAS scores of back pain were significantly decreased in lower lumbar group. But this was not seen in upper lumbar group. Both groups showed significant improvement of Oswestry Disability Index score.

          Conclusion

          Upper lumbar group had different clinical characteristics from those of lower lumbar group and these include older age, a higher incidence of autonomic dysfunctions and a higher incidence of patients with previous lumbar surgery. There were no significant differences in surgical outcomes, except for back pain, between two groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The unique characteristics of "upper" lumbar disc herniations.

          To compare the characteristics, presentation, and surgical outcome of patients with microdiscectomies at L1-L2 and L2-L3 with those we treated at L3-L4. We further sought to compare these results with those reported in the literature for discectomies at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. We reviewed the clinical data collected from 69 patients who had 72 L1-L2, L2-L3, and L3-L4 microdiscectomies performed from 1989 to 1999 at the New York University Medical Center. Patients who had surgery at L1-L2 or L2-L3 were grouped and compared with those treated at the L3-L4 level. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 12.9 months after surgery for presenting signs and symptoms, patient characteristics, and surgical outcome. Long-term follow-up via telephone interview was obtained at an average of 81.3 months after surgery. In the L1-L2 + L2-L3 group, 58% of the patients had previous lumbar disc surgery, compared with only 10% of those in the L3-L4 group, and 20% in the L1-L2 + L2-L3 group required a fusion during the procedure compared with only 10% in the L3-L4 group. These differences are both statistically significant. The short-term chart review demonstrates that only 58% and 53% of patients in the L1-L2 + L2-L3 group were improved with regard to radicular and back pain, respectively, whereas those in the L3-L4 group reported 94 and 87% rates of improvement in the same categories, both highly statistically significant findings. The long-term follow-up confirmed a highly statistically significantly worse outcome in the L1-L2 + L2-L3 group, with only 33% of patients reporting an improvement in their economic or functional status, compared with an 88% rate of improvement in the L3-L4 group. The outcome of our patients with L3-L4 herniations was similar to that reported in the literature for herniations at L4-L5 and L5-S1. Herniated discs at the L1-L2 or L2-L3 level are different entities from those at lower levels of the lumbar spine. The surgical outcome in terms of postoperative back and radicular pain is worse for herniated discs at L1-L2 and L2-L3 compared with those treated at L3-L4. Our patients with L1-L2 or L2-L3 surgically treated herniated discs were more likely to have had previous lumbar surgery and required a fusion more often than their counterparts with L3-L4 herniated discs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Upper lumbar disc herniations.

            This study reviews the presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations (L1-2, L2-3, L3-4). One hundred forty-one patients operated upon at three centers between 1980 and 1990 were analyzed (102 men, 39 women; 3 L1-2, 21 L2-3, 117 L3-4; average age 51.6 years; 10.4% of all lumbar discectomies performed). Preoperative signs and symptoms were highly variable. Sensory, motor, and reflex testing was variable and potentially misleading in suggesting a level of herniation. In analyzing radiographic studies (noncontrast CT, myelography, MRI) individually and using other radiographic studies and operative findings as a standard for comparison, a high false-negative rate was found for all studies when considered individually, especially at the higher L2-3 level. Intraoperative radiographs were employed with increasing frequency as the level of herniation ascended. Six operative complications (4.3%) were identified, all of which were treated and were resolving at the time of discharge. Follow-up obtained at an average of 2.2 years in 87% of patients by chart review showed no reoperations or late complications. Noncompensation patients had a significantly higher percentage of good/excellent results (86%) than those with compensation or legal claims pending (45% good/excellent results). Based upon these data, we recommend myelogram with postmyelogram CT and/or MRI in the workup of these patients and intraoperative radiographs in all cases when decompressing an upper lumbar disc herniation. Patients with compensation/legal claims should be approached cautiously, because their subjective results are significantly worse than those of noncompensation patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              High lumbar disc degeneration. Incidence and etiology.

              Three hundred seventy-nine consecutive magnetic resonance images (MRIs) with dual-echo images of the entire lumbar spine were reviewed by the authors. All 379 patients presented with back pain and/or leg pain; they were interviewed and examined. Pain drawings were completed by all. There were 42 patients (11.1%) with disc pathologies involving T12-L1, L1-2, and/or L2-3 levels. Six patients (1.6%) had isolated disc degeneration and/or herniations limited only to these high lumbar segments. The remaining 36 patients had degenerative changes of the higher discs with variable involvement of the lower lumbar discs. Out of 12 spondylolistheses of L5 on S1, 7 had high disc pathologies at one or more levels presenting as skipped lesions; more severe high disc lesions were noted in Grade II slips. Isolated high disc degeneration is often associated with pre-existing abnormalities such as end-plate defects, Scheuermann's disease, limbus vertebra, and so forth, and stressful cumulative work activities such as in construction workers, airplane mechanics, and so forth. High disc degeneration was noted above or below previous fractures. High disc involvement with diffuse changes in lower lumbar spine was more commonly found in ascending fashion in older age groups, and in patients who have had previous lower lumbar spine surgeries, prior fusions in particular. Our findings suggest that altered mechanics are associated with the high lumbar disc pathologies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Korean Neurosurg Soc
                J Korean Neurosurg Soc
                JKNS
                Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
                The Korean Neurosurgical Society
                2005-3711
                1598-7876
                November 2013
                30 November 2013
                : 54
                : 5
                : 379-383
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
                Author notes
                Address for reprints: Ki-Seok Park, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University College of Medicine, 95 Dunsanseo-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon 302-799, Korea. Tel: +82-42-611-3442, Fax: +82-42-611-3444, ks3432@ 123456eulji.ac.kr
                Article
                10.3340/jkns.2013.54.5.379
                3873349
                24379943
                7edff117-7693-4759-aaa1-d3c05b48eea2
                Copyright © 2013 The Korean Neurosurgical Society

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 May 2013
                : 05 August 2013
                : 11 November 2013
                Categories
                Clinical Article

                Surgery
                lumbar disc herniation,upper lumbar,clinical characteristics,surgical outcome
                Surgery
                lumbar disc herniation, upper lumbar, clinical characteristics, surgical outcome

                Comments

                Comment on this article