ICI 182,780 (Faslodex?) : Development of a novel, ?pure? antiestrogen

An introductory clinical trial of the anti-oestrogenic agent IC146474 in late or recurrent carcinoma of the breast is described. Forty-six patients have been treated, of whom 10 have shown a good response. This is of the same order as that seen with oestrogens and androgens. The particular advantage of this drug is the low incidence of troublesome side effects.

We have assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacological and anti-tumour effects of the specific steroidal anti-oestrogen ICI 182780 in 19 patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to tamoxifen. The agent was administered as a monthly depot intramuscular injection. Peak levels of ICI 182780 occurred a median of 8-9 days after dosing and then declined but were above the projected therapeutic threshold at day 28. Cmax during the first month was 10.5 ng/ml-1 and during the sixth month was 12.6 ng ml-1. The AUCs were 140.5 and 206.8 ng day ml-1 on the first and sixth month of dosing respectively, suggesting some drug accumulation. Luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels rose after withdrawal of tamoxifen and then plateaued, suggesting no effect of ICI 182780 on the pituitary-hypothalamic axis. There were no significant changes in serum levels of prolactin, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) or lipids. Side-effects were infrequent. Hot-flushes and sweats were not induced and there was no apparent effect of treatment upon the endometrium or vagina. Thirteen (69%) patients responded (seven had partial responses and six showed "no change' responses) to ICI 182780, after progression on tamoxifen, for a median duration of 25 months. Thus ICI 182780, given by monthly depot injection, and at the drug levels described, is an active second-line anti-oestrogen without apparent negative effects on the liver, brain or genital tract and warrants further evaluation in patients with advanced breast cancer.

The effect of idoxifene, a novel anti-oestrogen with less agonist activity than tamoxifen, was compared with that of tamoxifen on the growth of hormone-dependent MCF-7 breast cancer xenografts. Forty tumours were established with oestradiol support in ovariectomized athymic mice, allowed to grow to a median volume of 420 mm3 and then continued with oestradiol, no support, tamoxifen or idoxifene delivered by 1.5-cm silastic capsule. Tumour regression occurred with both anti-oestrogens, although maximum regression was observed following oestradiol withdrawal alone. While prolonged anti-oestrogen therapy was associated with static growth, tumour volumes were significantly lower with idoxifene (P=0.01). After 6 months, 0/10 idoxifene-treated tumours developed acquired resistance compared with 3/10 tumours treated with tamoxifen. In separate experiments, 94 animals were treated initially with oestradiol, tamoxifen, idoxifene or placebo following implantation with 1-mm3 pieces of either wild-type (WT) or tamoxifen-resistant (TR) MCF-7 tumour. After 4 months, only 1/11 WT tumours became established with idoxifene compared with 4/11 with tamoxifen, 8/12 with oestradiol and 0/12 with placebo. Likewise, fewer TR tumours were supported by idoxifene (3/12) than by tamoxifen (8/12) or oestrogen (11/12). These data indicate that, compared with tamoxifen, idoxifene shows reduced growth support of MCF-7 xenografts and may share only partial cross-resistance. Furthermore, the development of acquired anti-oestrogen resistance may be reduced during long-term idoxifene therapy. The drug's reduced agonist activity may, in part, explain these observations and indicate a preferable biochemical profile for breast cancer treatment.