50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting COVID‐19 booster vaccine intentions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Achieving broad immunity through vaccination is a cornerstone strategy for long‐term management of COVID‐19 infections, particularly the prevention of serious cases and hospitalizations. Evidence that vaccine‐induced immunity wanes over time points to the need for COVID‐19 booster vaccines, and maximum compliance is required to maintain population‐level immunity. Little is known of the correlates of intentions to receive booster vaccines among previously vaccinated individuals. The present study applied an integrated model to examine effects of beliefs from multiple social cognition theories alongside sets of generalized, stable beliefs on individuals' booster vaccine intentions. US residents ( N = 479) recruited from an online survey panel completed measures of social cognition constructs (attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and risk perceptions), generalized beliefs (vaccine hesitancy, political orientation, and free will beliefs), and COVID‐19 vaccine intentions. Social cognition constructs were related to booster vaccine intentions, with attitude and subjective norms exhibiting the largest effects. Effects of vaccine hesitancy, political orientation, and free will beliefs on intentions were mediated by the social cognition constructs, and only vaccine hesitancy had a small residual effect on intentions. Findings provide preliminary evidence that contributes to an evidence base of potential targets for intervention messages aimed at promoting booster vaccine intentions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The theory of planned behavior

            Icek Ajzen (1991)
            Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mhagger@ucmerced.edu
                Journal
                Appl Psychol Health Well Being
                Appl Psychol Health Well Being
                10.1111/(ISSN)1758-0854
                APHW
                Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1758-0846
                1758-0854
                22 February 2022
                22 February 2022
                : 10.1111/aphw.12349
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Psychological Sciences University of California Merced California USA
                [ 2 ] Health Sciences Research Institute University of California Merced California USA
                [ 3 ] Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland
                [ 4 ] School of Applied Psychology Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia
                [ 5 ] Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Martin S. Hagger, Department of Psychological Sciences and Health Sciences Research Institute, University of California, 5200 N. Lake Rd., Merced, CA 95343, USA.

                Email: mhagger@ 123456ucmerced.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2685-1546
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-685X
                Article
                APHW12349
                10.1111/aphw.12349
                9111247
                35193171
                7f1108db-aede-4d7c-a3f8-578f02a01257
                © 2022 The Authors. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Applied Psychology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 November 2021
                : 08 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 23, Words: 11616
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.6 mode:remove_FC converted:17.05.2022

                behavior change,integrated models,social cognition theory,vaccine attitudes and beliefs,vaccine hesitancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article