17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine-Learning Approach to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography–Based Fractional Flow Reserve : Result From the MACHINE Consortium

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a reliable modality to detect coronary artery disease. However, CTA generally overestimates stenosis severity compared with invasive angiography, and angiographic stenosis does not necessarily imply hemodynamic relevance when fractional flow reserve (FFR) is used as reference. CTA-based FFR (CT-FFR), using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), improves the correlation with invasive FFR results but is computationally demanding. More recently, a new machine-learning (ML) CT-FFR algorithm has been developed based on a deep learning model, which can be performed on a regular workstation. In this large multicenter cohort, the diagnostic performance ML-based CT-FFR was compared with CTA and CFD-based CT-FFR for detection of functionally obstructive coronary artery disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers

          Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and twelve classification methods were examined in terms of their performance and stability for predicting overall survival. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 464 lung cancer patients. To ensure the unbiased evaluation of different machine-learning methods, publicly available implementations along with reported parameter configurations were used. Furthermore, we used two independent radiomic cohorts for training (n = 310 patients) and validation (n = 154 patients). We identified that Wilcoxon test based feature selection method WLCX (stability = 0.84 ± 0.05, AUC = 0.65 ± 0.02) and a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 ± 0.03) had highest prognostic performance with high stability against data perturbation. Our variability analysis indicated that the choice of classification method is the most dominant source of performance variation (34.21% of total variance). Identification of optimal machine-learning methods for radiomic applications is a crucial step towards stable and clinically relevant radiomic biomarkers, providing a non-invasive way of quantifying and monitoring tumor-phenotypic characteristics in clinical practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
                Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                1941-9651
                1942-0080
                June 2018
                June 2018
                : 11
                : 6
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cardiology (A.C., M.L.L., J.D., K.N.)
                [2 ]Department of Radiology (A.C., A.K., M.L.L., K.N.)
                [3 ]Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute (Y.-H.K.)
                [4 ]Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Coronary Disease and Structural Heart Diseases Department, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland (M.K., C.K.).
                [5 ]Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (C.T., U.J.S.).
                [6 ]Department of Radiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden (J.D.G., A.P.).
                [7 ]Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan (A.K.).
                [8 ]Corporate Technology, Siemens SRL, Brasov, Romania (L.I.).
                [9 ]Medical Imaging Technologies, Siemens Healthcare, Princeton, NJ (S.R., P.S.).
                [10 ]Computed Tomography-Research & Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany (C.S.).
                [11 ]Department of Radiology (D.H.Y.)
                [12 ]Stanford University School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, CA, USA (K.N.).
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007217
                29914866
                7f44946c-73b4-43e3-bd36-81637949c0ab
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article