3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Simulated dynamics of southern cattle fever ticks ( Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus) microplus) in south Texas, USA: investigating potential wildlife-mediated impacts on eradication efforts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cattle fever ticks (CFT), Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus) annulatus and R. ( B.) microplus, are vectors of microbes causing bovine babesiosis and pose a threat to the economic viability of the US livestock industry. Efforts by the Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program (CFTEP) along the US-Mexico border in south Texas are complicated by the involvement of alternate hosts, including white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus) and nilgai ( Boselaphus tragocamelus).

          Methods

          In the present study, we use a spatially explicit, individual-based model to explore the potential effects of host species composition and host habitat use patterns on southern cattle fever ticks (SCFT, R. ( B.) microplus) infestation dynamics and efficacy of eradication schemes.

          Results

          In simulations without eradication efforts, mean off-host larval densities were much higher when cattle were present than when only white-tailed deer and nilgai were present. Densities in mesquite and meadows were slightly higher, and densities in mixed brush were much lower, than landscape-level densities in each of these scenarios. In eradication simulations, reductions in mean off-host larval densities at the landscape level were much smaller when acaricide was applied to cattle only, or to cattle and white-tailed deer, than when applied to cattle and nilgai. Relative density reductions in mesquite, mixed brush, and meadows depended on host habitat use preferences. Shifting nilgai habitat use preferences increasingly toward mixed brush and away from mesquite did not change mean off-host larval tick densities noticeably at the landscape level. However, mean densities were increased markedly in mesquite and decreased markedly in mixed brush, while no noticeable change in density was observed in meadows.

          Conclusions

          Our results suggest that continued integration of field data into spatially explicit, individual-based models will facilitate the development of novel eradication strategies and will allow near-real-time infestation forecasts as an aid in anticipating and preventing wildlife-mediated impacts on SCFT eradication efforts.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-021-04724-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The ODD protocol: A review and first update

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Infection prevalence and ecotypes of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in moose Alces alces , red deer Cervus elaphus , roe deer Capreolus capreolus and Ixodes ricinus ticks from Norway

              Background The geographical expansion of the tick Ixodes ricinus in northern Europe is a serious concern for animal and human health. The pathogen Anaplasma phagocytophilum is transmitted by ticks and causes emergences of tick-borne fever (anaplasmosis) in livestock. The transmission dynamics of the different ecotypes of A. phagocytophilum in the ecosystems is only partly determined. Red deer and roe deer contribute to circulation of different ecotypes of A. phagocytophilum in continental Europe, while the role of moose for circulation of different ecotypes is not fully established but an important issue in northern Europe. Methods We determined infection prevalence and ecotypes of A. phagocytophilum in moose (n = 111), red deer (n = 141), roe deer (n = 28) and questing ticks (n = 9241) in Norway. Results As previously described, red deer was exclusively linked to circulation of ecotype I, while roe deer was exclusively linked to circulation of ecotype II. Surprisingly, we found 58% ecotype I (n = 19) and 42% of ecotype II (n = 14) in moose. Both ecotypes were found in questing ticks in areas with multiple cervid species present, while only ecotype I was found in ticks in a region with only red deer present. Hence, the geographical distribution of ecotypes in ticks followed the distribution of cervid species present in a given region and their link to ecotype I and II. Conclusions Moose probably function as reservoirs for both ecotype I and II, indicating that the ecotypes of A. phagocytophilum are not entirely host-specific and have overlapping niches. The disease hazard depends also on both host abundance and the number of immature ticks fed by each host. Our study provides novel insights in the northern distribution and expansion of tick-borne fever.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hsuan006@tamu.edu
                wegrant@tamu.edu
                pteel@tamu.edu
                kim.lohmeyer@usda.gov
                beto.perezdeleon@usda.gov
                Journal
                Parasit Vectors
                Parasit Vectors
                Parasites & Vectors
                BioMed Central (London )
                1756-3305
                1 May 2021
                1 May 2021
                2021
                : 14
                : 231
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.264756.4, ISNI 0000 0004 4687 2082, Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, , Texas A&M University, ; College Station, TX 77843 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.264756.4, ISNI 0000 0004 4687 2082, Department of Entomology, , Texas A&M AgriLife Research, ; College Station, TX 77843 USA
                [3 ]Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory and Veterinary Pest Genomics Center, United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Kerrville, TX 78028 USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.508980.c, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, , United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, ; Parlier, CA 93648 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-0406
                Article
                4724
                10.1186/s13071-021-04724-3
                8088722
                33933151
                7f5a8786-5221-4fde-b09a-074c83667ae9
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 9 November 2020
                : 16 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
                Award ID: 58-3094-8-010
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
                Award ID: 58-3094-9-016
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Parasitology
                agent-based model,cattle fever tick eradication program,host community,individual-based model,integrated tick management,nilgai,white-tailed deer

                Comments

                Comment on this article