25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Short and Long-Term Effects of the Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Irbesartan on Intradialytic Central Hemodynamics: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled One-Year Intervention Trial (the SAFIR Study)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aim

          Little is known about the tolerability of antihypertensive drugs during hemodialysis treatment. The present study evaluated the use of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan.

          Design

          Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, one-year intervention trial.

          Setting and Participants

          Eighty-two hemodialysis patients with urine output >300 mL/day and dialysis vintage <1 year.

          Intervention

          Irbesartan/placebo 300 mg/day for 12 months administered as add-on to antihypertensive treatment using a predialytic systolic blood pressure target of 140 mmHg in all patients.

          Outcomes and Measurements

          Cardiac output, stroke volume, central blood volume, total peripheral resistance, mean arterial blood pressure, and frequency of intradialytic hypotension.

          Results

          At baseline, the groups were similar regarding age, comorbidity, blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, ultrafiltration volume, and dialysis parameters. Over the one-year period, predialytic systolic blood pressure decreased significantly, but similarly in both groups. Mean start and mean end cardiac output, stroke volume, total peripheral resistance, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were stable and similar in the two groups, whereas central blood volume increased slightly but similarly over time. The mean hemodynamic response observed during a dialysis session was a drop in cardiac output, in stroke volume, in mean arterial pressure, and in central blood volume, whereas heart rate increased. Total peripheral resistance did not change significantly. Overall, this pattern remained stable over time in both groups and was uninfluenced by ARB treatment. The total number of intradialytic hypotensive episodes was (placebo/ARB) 50/63 ( P = 0.4). Ultrafiltration volume, left ventricular mass index, plasma albumin, and change in intradialytic total peripheral resistance were significantly associated with intradialytic hypotension in a multivariate logistic regression analysis based on baseline parameters.

          Conclusion

          Use of the ARB irbesartan as an add-on to other antihypertensive therapy did not significantly affect intradialytic hemodynamics, neither in short nor long-term, and no significant increase in hypotensive episodes was seen.

          Trial registration

          Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00791830

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hemodialysis-associated hypotension as an independent risk factor for two-year mortality in hemodialysis patients.

          The relationship between blood pressure (BP) and mortality in hemodialysis patients has remained controversial. Some studies suggested that a lower pre- or postdialysis BP was associated with excess mortality, while others showed poorer outcome in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of hemodialysis-associated hypotension on mortality. We recruited 1244 patients (685 males; mean age, 60 +/- 13 years) who underwent hemodialysis in 28 units during the two-year study period beginning in December 1999. Pre-, intra-, and postdialysis BP, and BP upon standing soon after hemodialysis, were measured in all patients at entry. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect on mortality of pre-, intra-, and postdialysis BP, a fall in BP during hemodialysis, and a fall in BP upon standing soon after hemodialysis. During the study period, 149 patients died. Logistic models identified the lowest intradialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) and degree of fall in SBP upon standing soon after hemodialysis as significant factors affecting mortality, but not pre- or postdialysis SBP and diastolic BP. The adjusted odds ratio for death was 0.79 (95% CI 0.64-0.98) when the lowest intradialysis SBP was analyzed in increments of 20 mm Hg, and was 0.82 (95% CI 0.67-0.98) when the fall in SBP upon standing soon after hemodialysis was analyzed in increments of 10 mm Hg. These results suggest that intradialysis hypotension and orthostatic hypotension after hemodialysis are significant and independent factors affecting mortality in hemodialysis patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of fluid management guided by bioimpedance spectroscopy on cardiovascular parameters in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial.

            Fluid overload is the main determinant of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in hemodialysis patients. However, assessment of fluid overload can be difficult in clinical practice. We investigated whether objective measurement of fluid overload with bioimpedance spectroscopy is helpful in optimizing fluid status. Prospective, randomized, and controlled study. 156 hemodialysis patients from 2 centers were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Dry weight was assessed by routine clinical practice and fluid overload was assessed by bioimpedance spectroscopy in both groups. In the intervention group (n = 78), fluid overload information was provided to treating physicians and used to adjust fluid removal during dialysis. In the control group (n = 78), fluid overload information was not provided to treating physicians and fluid removal during dialysis was adjusted according to usual clinical practice. The primary outcome was regression of left ventricular mass index during a 1-year follow-up. Improvement in blood pressure and left atrial volume were the main secondary outcomes. Changes in arterial stiffness parameters were additional outcomes. Fluid overload was assessed twice monthly in the intervention group and every 3 months in the control group before the mid- or end-week hemodialysis session. Echocardiography, 48-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement, and pulse wave analysis were performed at baseline and 12 months. Baseline fluid overload parameters in the intervention and control groups were 1.45 ± 1.11 (SD) and 1.44 ± 1.12 L, respectively (P = 0.7). Time-averaged fluid overload values significantly decreased in the intervention group (mean difference, -0.5 ± 0.8 L), but not in the control group (mean difference, 0.1 ± 1.2 L), and the mean difference between groups was -0.5 L (95% CI, -0.8 to -0.2; P = 0.001). Left ventricular mass index regressed from 131 ± 36 to 116 ± 29 g/m(2) (P < 0.001) in the intervention group, but not in the control group (121 ± 35 to 120 ± 30 g/m(2); P = 0.9); mean difference between groups was -10.2 g/m(2) (95% CI, -19.2 to -1.17 g/m(2); P = 0.04). In addition, values for left atrial volume index, blood pressure, and arterial stiffness parameters decreased in the intervention group, but not in the control group. Ambulatory blood pressure data were not available for all patients. Assessment of fluid overload with bioimpedance spectroscopy provides better management of fluid status, leading to regression of left ventricular mass index, decrease in blood pressure, and improvement in arterial stiffness. Copyright © 2013 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the kidney: effects on kidney disease.

              The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system regulates renal vasomotor activity, maintains optimal salt and water homeostasis, and controls tissue growth in the kidney. However, pathologic consequences can result from overactivity of this cascade, involving it in the pathophysiology of kidney disease. An activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system promotes both systemic and glomerular capillary hypertension, which can induce hemodynamic injury to the vascular endothelium and glomerulus. In addition, direct profibrotic and proinflammatory actions of angiotensin II and aldosterone may also promote kidney damage. The majority of the untoward effects associated with angiotensin II appear to be mediated through its binding to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Aldosterone can also induce renal injury by binding to its receptor in the kidney. An understanding of this system is important to appreciate that inhibitors of this cascade can reduce the progression of chronic kidney disease in proteinuric disease states. Pharmacologic agents that can interfere with this cascade include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and aldosterone receptor antagonists. This paper will provide an overview of the renin-angiotensin system, review its role in kidney disease, examine the renal effects of inhibition of this cascade in experimental animal models, and review clinical studies utilizing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in patients with diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                1 June 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 6
                : e0126882
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
                [2 ]Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
                [3 ]Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
                [4 ]Department of Nephrology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
                [6 ]Department of Medicine, Fredericia Hospital, Fredericia, Denmark
                [7 ]Department of Biostatistics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
                Kurume University School of Medicine, JAPAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CDP KDK JDJ BJ. Performed the experiments: CDP KDK CS INT MKN. Analyzed the data: CDP KDK JDJ KLC BMB BJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BJ CS INT MKN BMB KLC. Wrote the paper: CDP KDK JDJ KLC CS INT MKN BMB BJ.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-40211
                10.1371/journal.pone.0126882
                4452642
                26030651
                7f5d2e70-bfc2-4723-87ee-14b18183d30a
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 9 September 2014
                : 8 March 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 5, Pages: 22
                Funding
                The SAFIR study was primarily supported by The Danish Council for Independent Research Medical Sciences, but also by (in alphabetical order): Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond, Beckett-Fonden, Civilingeniør Frode Nygaard og Hustrus Fond, The Danish Society of Hypertension, The Danish Society of Nephrology, Direktør Kurt Bønnelycke & Hustru Grethe Bønnelyckes Fond, Fabrikant Karl G Andersens Fond, Fausbølls Helsefond, Fonden til udvikling og uddannelse ved Nyremedicinsk Afdeling ved Aarhus Universitetshospital, Fresenius Medical Care Denmark, Frimodt-Heineke Fonden, Helen & Ejnar Bjørnows Fond, The Institute of Clinical Medicine at Aarhus University, Kirsten Anthonius’ Fond, Leo Pharmas Hypertensionslegat, Nyreforeningens Forskningsfond, Overlæge Poul M Christiansen & Hustrus Fond, Region Midtjyllands Sundhedsvidenskabelige Forskningsfond, Snedkermester Sophus Jacobsen and Hustru Astrid Jacobsens Fond. Sanofi Denmark provided original study medication (placebo and active tablets) free of charge and financially supported some meeting activity. NorDiaTech Denmark provided one Transonic Flow-QC Hemodialysis Monitor for three years including yearly calibration. The funders including Sanofi Denmark and NorDiaTech Denmark had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Data are provided as Stata database files (*.dta). The authors' data can also be accessed via a public repository (Danish public repository: The Danish Data Archive (DDA). Web: http://samfund.dda.dk/dda/default-en.asp; Accession number: 24983 Preservation of residual renal function in hemodialysis patients by treatment with an angiotensin II antagonist—a double blind randomised study, 2010 Danish Title: "Bevarelse af restnyrefunktion hos hæmodialysepatienter ved behandling med en angiotensin II antagonist—en dobbeltblind randomiseret undersøgelse (SAFIR)". For access via DDA, please contact DDA Project manager Bodil Stenvig, e-mail: bs@ 123456dda.dk .

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article