45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of capacity for Health Policy and Systems Research and Analysis in seven African universities: results from the CHEPSAA project

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The importance of health policy and systems research and analysis (HPSR+A) is widely recognized. Universities are central to strengthening and sustaining the HPSR+A capacity as they teach the next generation of decision-makers and health professionals. However, little is known about the capacity of universities, specifically, to develop the field. In this article, we report results of capacity self- assessments by seven universities within five African countries, conducted through the Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa (CHEPSAA).

          The capacity assessments focused on both capacity ‘assets’ and ‘needs’, and covered the wider context, as well as organizational and individual capacity levels. Six thematic areas of capacity were examined: leadership and governance, organizations’ resources, scope of HPSR+A teaching and research, communication, networking and getting research into policy and practice (GRIPP), demand for HPRS+A and resource environment. The self-assessments by each university used combinations of document reviews, semi-structured interviews and staff surveys, followed by comparative analysis. A framework approach, guided by the six thematic areas, was used to analyse data.

          We found that HPSR+A is an international priority, and an existing activity in Africa, though still neglected field with challenges including its reliance on unpredictable international funding. All universities have capacity assets, such as ongoing HPSR+A teaching and research. There are, however, varying levels of assets (such as differences in staff numbers, group sizes and amount of HPSR+A teaching and research), which, combined with different capacity needs at all three levels (such as individual training, improvement in systems for quality assurance and fostering demand for HPSR+A work), can shape a future agenda for HPSR+A capacity strengthening.

          Capacity assets and needs at different levels appear related. Possible integrated strategies for strengthening universities’ capacity include: refining HPSR+A vision, mainstreaming the subject into under- and post-graduate teaching, developing emerging leaders and aligning HPSR+A capacity strengthening within the wider organizational development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book Chapter: not found

          Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Framing the Questions

            In the first of a series of articles addressing the current challenges and opportunities for the development of Health Policy & Systems Research (HPSR), Kabir Sheikh and colleagues lay out the main questions vexing the field.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994–2007

              This article provides the first ever review of literature analysing the health policy processes of low and middle income countries (LMICs). Based on a systematic search of published literature using two leading international databases, the article maps the terrain of work published between 1994 and 2007, in terms of policy topics, lines of inquiry and geographical base, as well as critically evaluating its strengths and weaknesses. The overall objective of the review is to provide a platform for the further development of this field of work. From an initial set of several thousand articles, only 391 were identified as relevant to the focus of inquiry. Of these, 164 were selected for detailed review because they present empirical analyses of health policy change processes within LMIC settings. Examination of these articles clearly shows that LMIC health policy analysis is still in its infancy. There are only small numbers of such analyses, whilst the diversity of policy areas, topics and analytical issues that have been addressed across a large number of country settings results in a limited depth of coverage within this body of work. In addition, the majority of articles are largely descriptive in nature, limiting understanding of policy change processes within or across countries. Nonetheless, the broad features of experience that can be identified from these articles clearly confirm the importance of integrating concern for politics, process and power into the study of health policy. By generating understanding of the factors influencing the experience and results of policy change, such analysis can inform action to strengthen future policy development and implementation. This article, finally, outlines five key actions needed to strengthen the field of health policy analysis within LMICs, including capacity development and efforts to generate systematic and coherent bodies of work underpinned by both the intent to undertake rigorous analytical work and concern to support policy change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Policy Plan
                Health Policy Plan
                heapol
                heapol
                Health Policy and Planning
                Oxford University Press
                0268-1080
                1460-2237
                October 2014
                14 September 2013
                14 September 2013
                : 29
                : 7
                : 831-841
                Affiliations
                1Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2Health Policy and Systems Programme/Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 3Institute of Development Studies, University of Dar Es Salaam, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, 4Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana, 5Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development, Great Lakes University of Kisumu, Kisumu, Kenya, 6Health Policy Research Group and the Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria, 7School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa, 8Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa and 9London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                Author notes
                *Corresponding author. G16, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9LJ, UK. E-mail: t.mirzoev@ 123456leeds.ac.uk
                Article
                czt065
                10.1093/heapol/czt065
                4186210
                24038107
                7fa1e86a-dc1e-4729-bbda-c3bdf54d144c
                Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2013; all rights reserved.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

                History
                : 29 July 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Social policy & Welfare
                african universities,hpsr+a,capacity,assets and needs
                Social policy & Welfare
                african universities, hpsr+a, capacity, assets and needs

                Comments

                Comment on this article