29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Primary care physician compensation method in medical groups: does it influence the use and cost of health services for enrollees in managed care organizations?

      JAMA
      Capitation Fee, Family Practice, economics, statistics & numerical data, Female, Health Care Costs, Health Care Surveys, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Managed Care Programs, utilization, Multivariate Analysis, Office Visits, Physician Incentive Plans, Primary Health Care, Regression Analysis, Reimbursement, Incentive, Washington

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Growth of at-risk managed care contracts between health plans and medical groups has been well documented, but less is known about the nature of financial incentives within those medical groups or their effects on health care utilization. To test whether utilization and cost of health services per enrollee were influenced independently by the compensation method of the enrollee's primary care physician. Survey of medical groups contracting with selected managed care health plans, linked to 1994 plan enrollment and utilization data for adult enrollees. Medical groups, major managed care health plans, and their patients/enrollees in the state of Washington. Sixty medical groups in Washington, 865 primary care physicians (internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, or general practice) from those groups and affiliated with 1 or more of 4 managed care health plans, and 200 931 adult plan enrollees. The effect of method of primary care physician's compensation on the utilization and cost of health services was analyzed by weighted least squares and random effects regression. Total visits, hospital days, and per member per year estimated costs. Compensation method was not significantly (P>.30) related to utilization and cost in any multivariate analyses. Patient age (P<.001), female gender (P<.001), and plan benefit level (P<.001) were significantly positively related to visits, hospital days, and per member per year costs. The primary care physician's age was significantly negatively related (P<.001) to all 3 dependent measures. Compensation method was not significantly related to use and cost of health services per person. Enrollee, physician, and health plan benefit factors were the prime determinants of utilization and cost of health services.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article