80
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Antitumor Activity of Necuparanib Combined with Nab‐Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Phase I Results

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lessons Learned.

          • Despite the compelling preclinical rationale of evaluating the genetically engineered heparin derivative, necuparanib, combined with standard therapy in metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma, the results were ultimately disappointing.

          • Safety was documented, although dose escalation was limited by the number of subcutaneous injections, the potential for skin toxicity (cellulitis), and low‐level anticoagulant effect. Nonetheless, the hypothesis of targeting prothrombotic pathways in pancreas adenocarcinoma remains compelling.

          Background.

          Necuparanib is derived from unfractionated heparin and engineered for reduced anticoagulant activity while preserving known heparin‐associated antitumor properties. This trial assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and initial efficacy of necuparanib combined with gemcitabine ± nab‐paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

          Methods.

          Patients received escalating daily subcutaneous doses of necuparanib plus 1,000 mg/m 2 gemcitabine (days 1, 8, 15, and every 28 days). The protocol was amended to include 125 mg/m 2 nab‐paclitaxel after two cohorts (following release of the phase III MPACT data). The necuparanib starting dose was 0.5 mg/kg, with escalation via a modified 3 + 3 design until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined.

          Results.

          Thirty‐nine patients were enrolled into seven cohorts (necuparanib 0.5, 1 mg/kg + gemcitabine; necuparanib 1, 2, 4, 6, and 5 mg/kg + nab‐paclitaxel + gemcitabine). The most common adverse events were anemia (56%), fatigue (51%), neutropenia (51%), leukopenia (41%), and thrombocytopenia (41%). No deaths and two serious adverse events were potentially related to necuparanib. Measurable levels of necuparanib were seen starting at the 2 mg/kg dose. Of 24 patients who received at least one dose of necuparanib + nab‐paclitaxel + gemcitabine, 9 (38%) achieved a partial response and 6 (25%) achieved stable disease (63% disease control rate). Given a cellulitis event and mild activated partial thromboplastin time increases at 6 mg/kg, the 5 mg/kg dose was considered the MTD and selected for further assessment in phase II.

          Conclusion.

          Acceptable safety and encouraging signals of activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving necuparanib, nab‐paclitaxel, and gemcitabine were demonstrated.

          Translated abstract

          摘要

          背景. Necuparanib是普通肝素的衍生物, 经基因改造为在保留已知肝素相关抗肿瘤特性的同时降低抗凝血活性。本试验评估了necuparanib联合吉西他滨±白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌患者的安全性、药代动力学(PK)、药效学和初始疗效。

          材料与方法. 患者每天接受剂量递增的necuparanib皮下注射+吉西他滨1,000 mg/m 2(第1、8和15天, 28天一个周期)。在两个队列后对方案进行了修订, 纳入白蛋白结合型紫杉醇125 mg/m 2(发布III期MPACT数据之后)。Necuparanib的起始剂量为0.5mg/kg, 通过修订后的3 + 3设计进行剂量递增, 直至确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)。

          结果. 39例患者入组进入7个队列(necuparanib 0.5, 1 mg/kg +吉西他滨;necuparanib 1, 2, 4, 6和5 mg/kg +白蛋白结合型紫杉醇+吉西他滨)。最常见的不良事件为贫血(56%)、疲乏(51%)、中性粒细胞减少症(51%)、白细胞减少症(41%)和血小板减少症(41%)。研究期间发生了两起可能与necuparanib有关的严重不良事件, 未发生死亡事件。从2 mg/kg剂量水平开始可检出necuparanib。在至少接受了1次necuparanib+白蛋白结合型紫杉醇+吉西他滨给药的24例患者中, 9例(38%)患者达到部分缓解, 6例(25%)达到疾病稳定(63%疾病控制率)。由于6 mg/kg剂量水平下发生蜂窝织炎事件和活化部分凝血活酶时间轻度延长, 判定5 mg/kg剂量水平为MTD并且将在II期研究中对其进行进一步评估。

          结论. 研究证实接受necuparanib、白蛋白结合型紫杉醇和吉西他滨治疗的转移性胰腺癌患者的安全性可接受且活性较好。

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Roles of heparan-sulphate glycosaminoglycans in cancer.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effect of low molecular weight heparin on survival in patients with advanced malignancy.

            Studies in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism suggested that low molecular weight heparin may prolong survival. In a double-blind study, we evaluated the effect of low molecular weight heparin on survival in patients with advanced malignancy without venous thromboembolism. Patients with metastasized or locally advanced solid tumors were randomly assigned to receive a 6-week course of subcutaneous nadroparin or placebo. The primary efficacy analysis was based on time from random assignment to death. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. In total, 148 patients were allocated to nadroparin and 154 patients were allocated to placebo. Mean follow-up was 1 year. In the intention-to-treat analysis the overall hazard ratio of mortality was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.96) with a median survival of 8.0 months in the nadroparin recipients versus 6.6 months in the placebo group. After adjustment for potential confounders, the treatment effect remained statistically significant. Major bleeding occurred in five (3%) of nadroparin-treated patients and in one (1%) of the placebo recipients (P = .12). In the a priori specified subgroup of patients with a life expectancy of 6 months or more at enrollment, the hazard ratio was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.90) with a median survival of 15.4 and 9.4 months, respectively. For patients with a shorter life expectancy, the hazard ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.62 to 1.25). A brief course of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin favorably influences the survival in patients with advanced malignancy and deserves additional clinical evaluation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A randomized clinical trial of combination chemotherapy with and without low-molecular-weight heparin in small cell lung cancer.

              Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a chemotherapy-responsive tumor type but most patients ultimately experience disease progression. SCLC is associated with alterations in the coagulation system. The present randomized clinical trial (RCT) was designed to determine whether addition of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to combination chemotherapy (CT) would improve SCLC outcome compared with CT alone. Combination CT consisted of cyclophosphamide, epirubicine and vincristine (CEV) given at 3-weekly intervals for six cycles. Eighty-four patients were randomized to receive either CT alone (n = 42) or CT plus LMWH (n = 42). LMWH consisted of dalteparin given at a dose of 5000 U once daily during the 18 weeks of CT. Results Overall tumor response rates were 42.5% with CT alone and 69.2% with CT plus LMWH (P = 0.07). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months with CT alone and 10.0 months with CT plus LMWH (P = 0.01). Median overall survival was 8.0 months with CT alone and 13.0 months with CT plus LMWH (P = 0.01). Similar improvement in survival with LMWH treatment occurred in patients with both limited and extensive disease stages. The risk of death in the CT + LMWH group relative to that in the CT group was 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.30, 0.86) (P = 0.012 by log rank test). Toxicity from the experimental treatment was minimal and there were no treatment-related deaths. These results support the concept that anticoagulants, and particularly LMWH, may improve clinical outcomes in SCLC. Further clinical trials of this relatively non-toxic treatment approach are indicated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                oreillye@mskcc.org
                Journal
                Oncologist
                Oncologist
                10.1002/(ISSN)1549-490X
                The Oncologist
                oncologist
                theoncologist
                The Oncologist
                AlphaMed Press
                1083-7159
                1549-490X
                04 December 2017
                December 2017
                04 December 2017
                : 22
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/onco.v22.12 )
                : 1429-e139
                Affiliations
                [ a ] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine , New York, New York, USA
                [ b ] Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine , New York, New York, USA
                [ c ]Momenta Pharmaceuticals , Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
                [ d ]Novella Clinical , Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
                [ e ] Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: Eileen M. O'Reilly, M.D., Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, New YorK, NY 10065. Telephone: 646‐888‐4182; e‐mail: oreillye@ 123456mskcc.org
                Article
                ONCO12293
                10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0472
                5728039
                29158367
                7fdf2a5c-ebe2-4d60-b0dd-325a81be6740
                © AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors
                History
                : 20 November 2017
                : 13 September 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                4
                6
                31
                Clinical Trial Results

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article