8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Microdissection testicular extraction for a patient with transverse testicular ectopia and testicular fusion

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, Transverse testicular ectopia (TTE) is a rare condition whereby both testes migrate toward the same hemiscrotum. Most of the cases (65%) are diagnosed intraoperatively during an inguinal hernia repair; only few are diagnosed preoperatively.1 On the basis of various anomalies, TTE is classified into three types: Type 1, accompanied only by inguinal hernia (40%-50%); Type 2, accompanied by persistent Müllerian duct structures (30%); Type 3, accompanied by genitourinary anomalies, such as hypospadias (20%).2 In the case of TTE, the spermatic vessels of the ectopic testis pass through the midline and the inguinal canal adjacent to the spermatic cord of the normal opposite testis.3 To date, fewer than 150 cases of TTE have been reported in the literature,4 mostly in children. Adult patients with TTE consult doctors mainly because of oligoasthenozoospermia or infertility. To date, there have been no reports in the literature about TTE in infertile males with fused testicles and unilateral congenital absence of vas deferens (CAVD). Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) is an effective treatment option for patients with azoospermia. Herein, we present a case of application of Micro-TESE in an infertile patient with TTE. A 29-year-old infertile male who had not taken any contraceptive measures during 5 years of marriage visited our clinic. Sperm analysis showed azoospermia. Blood tests showed a serum testosterone level of 287 ng dl−1, luteinizing hormone 4.3 mIU ml−1, and follicle-stimulating hormone 4.98 mIU ml−1, all within normal limits. Physical examination revealed a testis-like mass in the right hemiscrotum and an empty left hemiscrotum. Scrotal ultrasonography showed hydrocele in the left testis and no testis on the left side, with right testicular volume slightly larger than that of a normal testis. Two fused testicles were revealed when we opened the left groin, one testis with epididymis and vas deferens and another with unilateral CAVD, both having a rich blood supply ( Figure 1a ). Micro-TESE was applied to the testis with CAVD ( Figure 1b ). A midline incision in the scrotal raphe was performed to expose the underlying testicular parenchyma. Microbiopsies of the testicle were made under higher magnification (15×-25×) ( Figure 1c ). The surgeon examined the microscopic images with the embryologist to enable definition of spermatozoa. Active sperms were found after culture and were kept under cryopreservation. Figure 1 (a) Two fused testicles without unilateral vas deferens. (b) A midline incision in the scrotal raphe. (c) Microsurgical extraction of testicular tissue with dilated seminiferous tubules using a microsurgical forceps. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are used in the diagnosis of TTE.5 6 However, the diagnosis before surgery is not always correct (as in our case) and is only revised intraoperatively. Hence, the detection of ectopic testis by radiologic evaluation remains controversial.7 Moreover, azoospermia by semen analysis was the major reason for the patient's visit to our clinic. Once the diagnosis is confirmed during surgery, TESE can be introduced as an optional treatment for patients with azoospermia. The utilization of TESE for nonobstructive azoospermia was reported in 1995 by Silber et al.,8 and several procedures to obtain sperm have been reported. However, traditional TESE such as open single biopsy, fine-needle aspiration, and core biopsy does not obtain foci of spermatogenesis until tissue is excised from the patient. Although multiple TESE could obtain more testicular tissue for identification of testicular spermatozoa, larger resections could cause damage arising from pressure atrophy from intratesticular swelling and hematoma.9 In other words, micro-TESE could minimize the damage to testicular tissue while maximizing sperm recovery. Moreover, spermatozoa retrieval improved from 45% to 63% after using the microdissection technique.10 We performed micro-TESE on the testis with CAVD to protect the normal function of the other testis. This procedure can maximize sperm retrieval in minimal volumes of testicular tissue with minimal postoperative testicular damage. In conclusion, micro-TESE can safely and effectively treat TTE patients with two fused testicles in the hemiscrotum without unilateral vas deferens (CAVD). AUTHOR CONRIBUTIONS CQ designed the study and revised the manuscript; NHS, YCW and YMW collected the clinical information; and CC drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declared no competing interests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision.

          Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) is often an effective method for sperm retrieval from men with non-obstructive azoospermia. However, TESE has been a blind procedure that does not identify the focal sperm-producing areas of the testicle until after tissue has been excised from the patient. Experience with a new technique of microdissection of testicular tubules is presented here that identifies sperm-containing regions before their removal. Identification of spermatogenically active regions of the testicle is possible by direct examination of the individual seminiferous tubules. The underlying concept for this technique is simple: seminiferous tubules containing many developing germ cells, rather than Sertoli cells alone, are likely to be larger and more opaque than tubules without sperm production. In a sequential series of TESE cases for men with non-obstructive azoospermia, the ability to find spermatozoa increased from 45% (10/22) to 63% (17/27) after introduction of the microdissection technique. Microdissected samples yielded an average of 160,000 spermatozoa per sample in only 9.4 mg of tissue, whereas only 64,000 spermatozoa were found in standard biopsy samples that averaged 720 mg in weight (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). For men where microdissection was attempted, successful identification of enlarged tubules was possible in 56% (15/27) of cases. However, spermatozoa were retrieved with microdissection TESE for six men in whom sperm retrieval was unsuccessful with standard TESE approaches (35% of all men with spermatozoa retrieved). These findings suggest that microdissection TESE can improve sperm retrieval for men with non-obstructive azoospermia over that achieved with previously described biopsy techniques.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Transverse testicular ectopia detected by MR imaging and MR venography.

            Crossed testicular ectopia is a rare anomaly, characterised by migration of one testis towards the opposite inguinal canal. In most reported cases, the correct diagnosis was not made pre-operatively. We report a case of transverse testicular ectopia diagnosed pre-operatively with MRI. MRI and MR venography demonstrated unilateral location of both testes in the right inguinal canal, which was confirmed by surgery. We provide a brief literature review of transverse testicular ectopia and the imaging of undescended testis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sperm retrieval outcomes with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with cryptozoospermia.

              Several studies support of the use of testicular rather than ejaculated spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in couples with virtual azoospermia or cryptozoospermia, although this approach remains controversial. We sought to evaluate sperm retrieval outcomes with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with cryptozoospermia. We conducted a retrospective study of 24 consecutive micro-TESEs in men with cryptozoospermia. We also evaluated the outcomes of seven consecutive TESAs (testicular sperm aspiration) in cryptozoospermic men during the same time period (January 2007 and September 2014). Micro-TESE and TESA were performed on the day prior to ICSI. Final assessment of sperm recovery (reported on the day of ICSI) was recorded as (i) successful (available spermatozoa for ICSI) or (ii) unsuccessful (no spermatozoa for ICSI). The decision to perform a unilateral or bilateral micro-TESE was guided by the intra-operative evaluation of sperm recovery from the first testicle. A unilateral procedure was performed in 87.5% (21/24) and 57% (4/7) of the micro-TESE and TESA cohorts, respectively. Sperm recovery was successful in 96% (23/24) of the men who underwent micro-TESE and 43% (3/7) of the men who underwent TESA (p < 0.01). The ICSI pregnancy rates (per embryo transfer) in the micro-TESE and TESA groups were comparable [33% (6/18) and 50% (1/2), respectively]. The data indicate that micro-TESE is a highly successful sperm retrieval technique for men with cryptozoospermia and few of these men will require a bilateral procedure. Moreover, sperm retrieval rates are higher with micro-TESE than TESA in this group of men.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Asian J Androl
                Asian J. Androl
                AJA
                Asian Journal of Andrology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                1008-682X
                1745-7262
                May-Jun 2018
                01 September 2017
                : 20
                : 3
                : 306-307
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Dr. C Qin ( delchen0909@ 123456163.com )
                Article
                AJA-20-306
                10.4103/aja.aja_33_17
                5952488
                28869220
                7fe4dec6-fe44-43af-9c5e-1903362ddc7c
                Copyright: © The Author(s)(2017)

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 25 February 2017
                : 20 July 2017
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article