7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Suturing techniques and postoperative management in penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To report on the suturing techniques and aspects of postoperative management in penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom.

          Methods

          A postal questionnaire was sent to 137 ophthalmic consultants identified from a Royal College of Ophthalmology database as having a special interest in anterior segment surgery. The questionnaire surveyed surgeon preferences for surgical and suturing technique for penetrating keratoplasty surgery, and the postoperative care of corneal grafts.

          Results

          In all, 68% of questionnaires were completed and returned: 73% of respondents used a Flieringa ring or equivalent, 94% routinely used cardinal sutures, with 50.5% removing them at the end of the procedure. The most common suturing technique for routine penetrating keratoplasty was a single continuous suture (35%). In these cases, a 10/0 nylon suture was used by 89%. Sixty-six percent changed their technique in high-risk cases, 52% used a 3-1-1 knot, and 75% made a distinction between a reef and granny knot, with 76% using a reef. Thirty percent buried the knots within the donor material, and 29% within the host tissue. Twenty-five percent had no routine time for graft suture removal, but 41% removed them between 1 and 2 years post-surgery. After suture removal, 98% used steroids and 88% used topical antibiotics. Thirty-four percent stopped topical steroids before suture removal, with 38% stopping topical steroids more than 3 months prior to suture removal.

          Conclusion

          This survey demonstrates that there is considerable variation in suturing techniques and postoperative care for penetrating keratoplasty. These significant variations in practice need to be considered when interpreting outcomes and research.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Ophthalmol
          Clin Ophthalmol
          Clinical Ophthalmology
          Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
          Dove Medical Press
          1177-5467
          1177-5483
          2012
          2012
          15 August 2012
          : 6
          : 1335-1340
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom
          [2 ]Tongdean Eye Clinic, Hove, United Kingdom
          Author notes
          Correspondence: Christopher SC Liu, Sussex Eye Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BF, United Kingdom, Tel +44 1273 606 126, Fax +44 1273 553 038, Email cscliu@ 123456aol.com
          Article
          opth-6-1335
          10.2147/OPTH.S35460
          3429286
          22942639
          801771dc-8d4b-4847-8296-20337474bb91
          © 2012 Lee et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

          History
          Categories
          Original Research

          Ophthalmology & Optometry
          penetrating keratoplasty,corneal graft,anterior segment surgery,cornea,corneal transplantation,corneal surgery

          Comments

          Comment on this article