European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th Edition - Part 1Supported by the EGS Foundation

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Foreword

It gives me pleasure to introduce the 4th edition of the EGS Guidelines. The Third edition proved to be extremely successful, being translated into 7 languages with over 70000 copies being distributed across Europe; it has been downloadable, free, as a pdf file for the past 4 years. As one of the main objectives of the European Glaucoma Society has been to both educate and standardize glaucoma practice within the EU, these guidelines were structured so as to play their part.

Glaucoma is a living specialty, with new ideas on causation, mechanisms and treatments constantly appearing. As a number of years have passed since the publication of the last edition, changes in some if not all of these ideas would be expected.

For this new edition of the guidelines a number of editorial teams were created, each with responsibility for an area within the specialty; updating where necessary, introducing new diagrams and Flowcharts and ensuring that references were up to date. Each team had writers previously involved with the last edition as well as newer and younger members being co-opted.

As soon as specific sections were completed they had further editorial comment to ensure cross referencing and style continuity with other sections.

Overall guidance was the responsibility of Anders Heijl and Carlo Traverso. Tribute must be made to the Task Force whose efforts made the timely publication of the new edition possible.

Roger Hitchings

Chairman of the EGS Foundation

www.eugs.org

The Guidelines Writers and Contributors

Augusto Azuara Blanco

Luca Bagnasco

Alessandro Bagnis

Keith Barton

Christoph Baudouin

Boel Bengtsson

Alain Bron

Francesca Cordeiro

Barbara Cvenkel

Philippe Denis

Christoph Faschinger

Panayiota Founti

Stefano Gandolfi

David Garway Heath

Francisco Goni

Franz Grehn

Anders Heijl

Roger Hitchings

Gabor Hollo

Tony Hommer

Michele Iester

Jost Jonas

Yves Lachkar

Giorgio Marchini

Frances Meier Gibbons

Stefano Miglior

Marta Misiuk-Hojo

Maria Musolino

Jean Philippe Nordmann

Norbert Pfeiffer

Luis Abegao Pinto

Luca Rossetti

John Salmon

Leo Schmetterer

Riccardo Scotto

Tarek Shaarawy

Ingeborg Stalmans

Gordana Sunaric Megevand

Ernst Tamm

John Thygesen

Fotis Topouzis

Carlo Enrico Traverso

Anja Tuulonen

Ananth Viswanathan

Thierry Zeyen

The Guidelines Task Force

Luca Bagnasco

Anders Heijl

Carlo Enrico Traverso

Augusto Azuara Blanco

Alessandro Bagnis

David Garway Heath

Michele Iester

Yves Lachkar

Ingeborg Stalmans

Gordana Sunaric Mégevand

Fotis Topouzis

Anja Tuulonen

Ananth Viswanathan

The EGS Executive Committee

Carlo Enrico Traverso (President)

Anja Tuulonen (Vice President)

Roger Hitchings (Past President)

Anton Hommer (Treasurer)

Barbara Cvenkel

Julian Garcia Feijoo

David Garway Heath

Norbert Pfeiffer

Ingeborg Stalmans

The Board of the European Glaucoma Society Foundation

Roger Hitchings (Chair)

Carlo E. Traverso (Vice Chair)

Franz Grehn

Anders Heijl

John Thygesen

Fotis Topouzis

Thierry Zeyen

The EGS Committees

CME and Certification

Gordana Sunaric Mégevand (Chair)

Carlo Enrico Traverso (Co-chair)

Delivery of Care

Anton Hommer (Chair)

EU Action

Thierry Zeyen (Chair)

Carlo E. Traverso (Co-chair)

Education

John Thygesen (Chair)

Fotis Topouzis (Co-chair)

Glaucogene

Ananth Viswanathan (Chair)

Fotis Topouzis (Co-chair)

Industry Liaison

Roger Hitchings (Chair)

Information Technology

Ingeborg Stalmans (Chair)

Carlo E. Traverso (Co-chair)

National Society Liaison

Anders Heijl (Chair)

Program Planning

Fotis Topouzis (Chair)

Ingeborg Stalmans (Co-chair)

Quality and Outcomes

Anja Tuulonen (Chair)

Augusto Azuara Blanco (Co-chair)

Scientific

Franz Grehn (Chair)

David Garway Heath (Co-chair)

Related collections

Most cited references 116

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

A Sommer, J Tielsch, J. Katz … (1991)

A detailed ocular examination, including perimetry, was conducted on 5308 black and white subjects aged 40 years and older in a population-based prevalence survey in east Baltimore, Md. Repeated, detailed examinations were carried out on selected subjects. Roughly half of all subjects with optic nerve damage from primary open angle glaucoma, regardless of race, were unaware that they had the condition. The average intraocular pressure (IOP) among black patients with glaucoma who were receiving treatment was virtually identical to that in those black patients who were not receiving treatment (median IOP, 20 mm Hg); treated eyes of white patients had a lower IOP than those eyes of white patients who were not receiving treatment (mean [+/- SD] IOP, 18.69 +/- 3.23 mm Hg vs 24.15 +/- 5.23 mm Hg; P less than .001). The risk of glaucomatous optic nerve damage increased with the height of the screening IOP, particularly at levels of 22 to 29 and 30 mm Hg and above (relative rate compared with IOP of 15 mm Hg or lower, 12.8 and 40.1 mm Hg, respectively). More than half of all glaucomatous eyes had a screening IOP below 21 mm Hg, whether these eyes were receiving treatment or not. The IOP in glaucomatous eyes tended to rise on follow-up, in contrast with nonglaucomatous eyes in which the IOP was as likely to rise as to fall. Results confirmed that IOP is an important factor in glaucoma, but did not support the traditional distinction between "normal" and "elevated" pressure, nor its corollaries, "low-tension" glaucoma and "high-tension" glaucoma.

0 comments Cited 156 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study.

P. Mitchell, W. Smith, K Attebo … (1996)

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in an Australian community whose residents are 49 years of age or older. There were 3654 persons, representing 82.4% of permanent residents from an area west of Sydney, Australia, who were examined. The population was identified by a door-to-door census of all dwellings and by closely matched findings from the national census. All participants received a detailed eye examination, including applanation tonometry, suprathreshold automated perimetry (Humphrey 76-point test), and Zeiss stereoscopic optic disc photography. Glaucoma suspects were asked to return for full threshold fields (Humphrey 30-2 test), gonioscopy, and repeat tonometry. A 5-point hemifield difference on the 76-point test was found in 616 persons (19% of people tested). Humphrey 30-2 tests were performed on 336 glaucoma suspects (9.2% of population), of whom 125 had typical glaucomatous field defects. Two hundred three persons had enlarged or asymmetric cup-disc ratios (> or = 0.7 in 1 or both eyes or a cup-disc ratio difference of > or = 0.3). Open-angle glaucoma was diagnosed when glaucomatous defects on the 30-2 test matched the optic disc changes, without regard to the intraocular pressure level. This congruence was found in 87 participants (2.4%), whereas an additional 21 persons (0.6%) had clinical signs of open-angle glaucoma but incomplete examination findings. Open-angle glaucoma was thus found in 108 persons, a prevalence of 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-3.6), of whom 49% were diagnosed previously. An exponential rise in prevalence was observed with increasing age. Ocular hypertension, defined as an intraocular pressure in either eye greater than 21 mmHg, without matching disc and field changes, was present in 3.7% of this population (95% CI, 3.1-4.3), but there was no significant age-related increase in prevalence. The prevalence of glaucoma was higher in women after adjusting for age (odds ratio, 1.5; CI, 1.0-2.2). There was no sex difference in the age-adjusted prevalence of ocular hypertension. These data provide detailed age and sex-specific prevalence rates for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in an older Australian population.

0 comments Cited 150 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease.

Joseph Doyle, P Mills, Donald L. Budenz … (2005)

To provide a reliable, comprehensive staging system to assess glaucoma stage in the absence of an universally accepted glaucoma staging system (GSS) on the basis of visual field results. Literature review and GSS adaptation. After a review of published GSSs was conducted, the Bascom Palmer (Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish) GSS was selected as an appropriate platform for a retrospective GSS on the basis of visual fields. The system was modified by a panel of glaucoma specialists, and additional modifications were made after pilot testing to cover the full range of disease progression, from preglaucoma diagnosis to complete blindness; the ordered stages reflect the typical progression of glaucoma. The GSS is comprised of six ordered stages and is on the basis of the Humphrey visual field. The completed GSS was validated by reviewing patient charts from 12 US glaucoma centers. The GSS allows accurate staging of 100% of glaucoma on the basis of visual fields and other data, enabling evaluation of disease progression and resource utilization at various glaucoma stages. Additionally, treatment costs may be assigned to determine cost-effectiveness of treatment. Research utilizing the GSS has found that cost of care increases with increasing disease severity. The GSS may be used as the basis for creating treatment guidelines, which have the potential to delay glaucoma progression and lower treatment costs.

0 comments Cited 133 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Br J Ophthalmol

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Br J Ophthalmol

Journal ID (hwp): bjophthalmol

Journal ID (publisher-id): bjo

Title: The British Journal of Ophthalmology

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )

ISSN (Print): 0007-1161

ISSN (Electronic): 1468-2079

Publication date (Print): April 2017

Publication date (Electronic): 21 March 2017

Volume: 101

Issue: 4

Pages: 1-72

Article

Publisher ID: bjophthalmol-2016-EGSguideline.001

DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-EGSguideline.001

PMC ID: 5583682

PubMed ID: 27378485

SO-VID: 8035aa92-b6a6-4e3a-b957-65c8bd7c0330

License:

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

History

Custom metadata

special-feature unlocked

ScienceOpen disciplines: Ophthalmology & Optometry

Data availability:

ScienceOpen disciplines: Ophthalmology & Optometry

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 15

See all cited by

Most referenced authors 996

See all reference authors