45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Framing the Issues: Moral Distress in Health Care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Moral distress in health care has been identified as a growing concern and a focus of research in nursing and health care for almost three decades. Researchers and theorists have argued that moral distress has both short and long-term consequences. Moral distress has implications for satisfaction, recruitment and retention of health care providers and implications for the delivery of safe and competent quality patient care. In over a decade of research on ethical practice, registered nurses and other health care practitioners have repeatedly identified moral distress as a concern and called for action. However, research and action on moral distress has been constrained by lack of conceptual clarity and theoretical confusion as to the meaning and underpinnings of moral distress. To further examine these issues and foster action on moral distress, three members of the University of Victoria/University of British Columbia (UVIC/UVIC) nursing ethics research team initiated the development and delivery of a multi-faceted and interdisciplinary symposium on Moral Distress with international experts, researchers, and practitioners. The goal of the symposium was to develop an agenda for action on moral distress in health care. We sought to develop a plan of action that would encompass recommendations for education, practice, research and policy. The papers in this special issue of HEC Forum arose from that symposium. In this first paper, we provide an introduction to moral distress; make explicit some of the challenges associated with theoretical and conceptual constructions of moral distress; and discuss the barriers to the development of research, education, and policy that could, if addressed, foster action on moral distress in health care practice. The following three papers were written by key international experts on moral distress, who explore in-depth the issues in three arenas: education, practice, research. In the fifth and last paper in the series, we highlight key insights from the symposium and the papers in the series, propose to redefine moral distress, and outline directions for an agenda for action on moral distress in health care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout, and Job Dissatisfaction

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale.

            This methodological research developed and evaluated the moral distress scale from 1994 to 1997. Although nurses confront moral questions in their practice daily, few instruments are available to measure moral concepts. The methodological design used a convenience sample consisted of 214 nurses from several Unites States hospitals. The framework guiding the development of the moral distress scale (MDS) included Jameton's conceptualization of moral distress, House and Rizzo's role conflict theory, and Rokeach's value theory. Items for the MDS were developed from research on the moral problems that nurses confront in hospital practice. The MDS consists of 32 items in a 7-point Likert format; a higher score reflects a higher level of normal distress. Mean scores on each item ranged from 3.9 to 5.5, indicating moderately high levels of moral distress. The item with the highest mean score (M=5.47) was working where the number of staff is so low that care is inadequate. Factor analysis yielded three factors: individual responsibility, not in the patient's best interest, and deception. No demographic or professional variables were related to moral distress. Fifteen percent of the nurses had resigned a position in the past because of moral distress. The results support the reliability and validity of the MDS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Moral distress reconsidered.

              Moral distress has received much attention in the international nursing literature in recent years. In this article, we describe the evolution of the concept of moral distress among nursing theorists from its initial delineation by the philosopher Jameton to its subsequent deployment as an umbrella concept describing the impact of moral constraints on health professionals and the patients for whom they care. The article raises worries about the way in which the concept of moral distress has been portrayed in some nursing research and expresses concern about the fact that research, so far, has been largely confined to determining the prevalence of experiences of moral distress among nurses. We conclude by proposing a reconsideration, possible reconstruction and multidisciplinary approach to understanding the experiences of all health professionals who have to make difficult moral judgements and decisions in complex situations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bpauly@uvic.ca
                Journal
                HEC Forum
                HEC Forum
                Hec Forum
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0956-2737
                1572-8498
                25 March 2012
                25 March 2012
                March 2012
                : 24
                : 1
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC USA
                [2 ]Centre for Addictions Research of BC, University of Victoria, Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC USA
                [3 ]University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                [4 ]University of Victoria, Victoria, BC USA
                Article
                9176
                10.1007/s10730-012-9176-y
                3348467
                22446885
                803db9c2-21cb-46d7-aae9-762172737bf5
                © The Author(s) 2012
                History
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

                Ethics
                moral distress,retention,ethical practice,recruitment,healthcare
                Ethics
                moral distress, retention, ethical practice, recruitment, healthcare

                Comments

                Comment on this article