43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Ultra-prolonged activation of CO 2-sensing neurons disorients mosquitoes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          CO 2 present in exhaled air is the most important sensory cue for female blood-feeding mosquitoes, causing activation of long-distance host-seeking flight, navigation towards the vertebrate host 1 , and, in the case of Aedes aegypti, increased sensitivity to skin odours 2 . The CO 2 detection machinery is therefore an ideal target to disrupt host seeking. We use electrophysiological assays to identify a volatile odourant that causes an unusual, ultra-prolonged activation of CO 2-detecting neurons in three major disease-transmitting mosquitoes: Anopheles gambiae, Culex quinquefasciatus and A. aegypti. Importantly ultra-prolonged activation of this neuron severely compromises its ability to subsequently detect CO 2 for several minutes. We also identify odours that strongly inhibit the CO 2-sensitive neuron as candidates for use in disruption of host-seeking behaviour, as well as an odour that evokes CO 2-like activity and thus has potential use as a lure in trapping devices. Analysis of responses to panels of structurally related odours across the three mosquitoes and Drosophila, which have related CO 2-receptor proteins, reveals a pattern of inhibition that is often conserved. We use video tracking in wind-tunnel experiments to demonstrate that the novel ultra-prolonged activators can completely disrupt CO 2-mediated activation as well as source-finding behaviour in Aedes mosquitoes, even after the odour is no longer present. Finally, semi-field studies demonstrate that use of ultra-prolonged activators disrupts CO 2-mediated hut entry behaviour of Culex mosquitoes. The three classes of CO 2 response modifying odours offer powerful instruments for developing new generations of insect repellents and lures, which even in small quantities can interfere with the ability of mosquitoes to seek humans.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Two chemosensory receptors together mediate carbon dioxide detection in Drosophila.

          Blood-feeding insects, including the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae, use highly specialized and sensitive olfactory systems to locate their hosts. This is accomplished by detecting and following plumes of volatile host emissions, which include carbon dioxide (CO2). CO2 is sensed by a population of olfactory sensory neurons in the maxillary palps of mosquitoes and in the antennae of the more genetically tractable fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster. The molecular identity of the chemosensory CO2 receptor, however, remains unknown. Here we report that CO2-responsive neurons in Drosophila co-express a pair of chemosensory receptors, Gr21a and Gr63a, at both larval and adult life stages. We identify mosquito homologues of Gr21a and Gr63a, GPRGR22 and GPRGR24, and show that these are co-expressed in A. gambiae maxillary palps. We show that Gr21a and Gr63a together are sufficient for olfactory CO2-chemosensation in Drosophila. Ectopic expression of Gr21a and Gr63a together confers CO2 sensitivity on CO2-insensitive olfactory neurons, but neither gustatory receptor alone has this function. Mutant flies lacking Gr63a lose both electrophysiological and behavioural responses to CO2. Knowledge of the molecular identity of the insect olfactory CO2 receptors may spur the development of novel mosquito control strategies designed to take advantage of this unique and critical olfactory pathway. This in turn could bolster the worldwide fight against malaria and other insect-borne diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Odor coding in the Drosophila antenna.

            Odor coding in the Drosophila antenna is examined by a functional analysis of individual olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in vivo. Sixteen distinct classes of ORNs, each with a unique response spectrum to a panel of 47 diverse odors, are identified by extracellular recordings. ORNs exhibit multiple modes of response dynamics: an individual neuron can show either excitatory or inhibitory responses, and can exhibit different modes of termination kinetics, when stimulated with different odors. The 16 ORN classes are combined in stereotyped configurations within seven functional types of basiconic sensilla. One sensillum type contains four ORNs and the others contain two neurons, combined according to a strict pairing rule. We provide a functional map of ORNs, showing that each ORN class is restricted to a particular spatial domain on the antennal surface.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The molecular basis of CO2 reception in Drosophila.

              CO(2) elicits a response from many insects, including mosquito vectors of diseases such as malaria and yellow fever, but the molecular basis of CO(2) detection is unknown in insects or other higher eukaryotes. Here we show that Gr21a and Gr63a, members of a large family of Drosophila seven-transmembrane-domain chemoreceptor genes, are coexpressed in chemosensory neurons of both the larva and the adult. The two genes confer CO(2) response when coexpressed in an in vivo expression system, the "empty neuron system." The response is highly specific for CO(2) and dependent on CO(2) concentration. The response shows an equivalent dependence on the dose of Gr21a and Gr63a. None of 39 other chemosensory receptors confers a comparable response to CO(2). The identification of these receptors may now allow the identification of agents that block or activate them. Such agents could affect the responses of insect pests to the humans they seek.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                22 July 2011
                2 June 2011
                02 December 2011
                : 474
                : 7349
                : 87-91
                Affiliations
                [2 ]Cellular, Molecular, and Developmental Biology Program
                [3 ]Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
                [4 ]International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Anandasankar Ray, Department of Entomology, University of California, 3401 Watkins Drive, Riverside, CA 92521, USA, Phone: +1(951) 827-5998, Fax:+1(951)827-3086, anand.ray@ 123456ucr.edu Correspondence should be addressed to A.R. ( anand.ray@ 123456ucr.edu )
                [1]

                These authors contributed equally

                Author Information A.R and S.L.T. are listed as inventors in a pending patent application, which is filed by the University of California, Riverside. A.R serves as consultant for a corporation that has obtained the license for this pending patent application from UC Riverside.

                Article
                nihpa313006
                10.1038/nature10081
                3150595
                21637258
                803e9264-2b61-4170-ba6a-4d393dbe4d88

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Extramural Activities : NIAID
                Award ID: R01 AI087785-03 || AI
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Extramural Activities : NIAID
                Award ID: R01 AI087785-02 || AI
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Extramural Activities : NIAID
                Award ID: R01 AI087785-01 || AI
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article