5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      V-amylose Structural Characteristics, Methods of Preparation, Significance, and Potential Applications

      , ,
      Food Reviews International
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references132

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Amylose-inclusion complexes: Formation, identity and physico-chemical properties

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Structure studies of amylose-V complexes and retro-graded amylose by action of alpha amylases, and a new method for preparing amylodextrins

            Human-salivary, porcine-pancreatic, and Bacillus subtilis alpha amylases were used to study the structure of amylose-V complexes with butyl alcohol, tert-butyl alcohol, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, and 1-naphthol, and of retrograded amylose. Alpha amylase hydrolyzes the amorphous, folding areas on the surfaces of the lamella of packed helices, with the formation of resistant, amylodextrin fragments. Their degree of polymerization (d.p.) corresponds to the diameter of the helices and the folding length of the chain. The resistant fragments were fractionated on a column of Bio-Gel A-0.5m. Gel filtration of human-salivary and porcine-pancreatic alpha amylase hydrolyzates gave resistant fragments whose peak fractions, i.e., the three pooled fractions from the gel-filtration column with the highest amount of carbohydrate, had a d.p. of 75 +/- 4 for the amylose complex with butyl alcohol, 90 +/- 3 for those with tert-butyl alcohol and tetrachloroethane, and 123 +/- 2 for that with 1-naphthol. These d.p. values correspond to helices of six residues per turn with a folding length of 10 nm, seven residues per turn with a folding length of 10 nm, and eight residues per turn with a folding length of 12 nm (or nine residues per turn with a folding length of 10 nm), respectively. Acid hydrolysis of retrograded amylose gave a resistant fragment having an average d.p. of 32, human-salivary and porcine-pancreatic alpha amylases gave a resistant fragment of d.p. 43, and Bacillus subtilis alpha amylase gave a resistant fragment of d.p. 50. A structure for retrograded amylose is proposed in which there are crystalline, double-helical regions that are 10 nm long, interspersed with amorphous regions. The amorphous regions are hydrolyzed by acid and by alpha amylases, leaving the crystalline regions intact. The differences in the sizes of the resistant amylodextrins depend on the differences in the specificities of the hydrolyzing agents: acid hydrolyzes right up to the edge of the crystalline region, whereas the alpha amylases hydrolyze up to some point several D-glucosyl residues away from the crystalline region, leaving "stubs" on the ends of the amylodextrins whose sizes are dependent on the sizes of the binding sites of the individual alpha amylases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Digestibility of Amylose-Lipid Complexes in-vitro and in-vivo

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Food Reviews International
                Food Reviews International
                Informa UK Limited
                8755-9129
                1525-6103
                October 2012
                October 2012
                : 28
                : 4
                : 412-438
                Article
                10.1080/87559129.2012.660718
                807c76aa-5ffe-4f21-81f6-0eb50c0eda7b
                © 2012
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article