15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brachial Plexus Injury Caused by Indwelling Axillary Venous Pacing Leads

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A 64-year-old male patient underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation via the axillary venous approach. Two weeks later, the patient started complaining of "electric shock-like" pain in the left axillary area. During physical examination, typical pain in the left axillary area was reproduced whenever his left shoulder was passively abducted more than 60 degrees. Fluoroscopic examination showed that the left ventricle (LV) and right atrium (RA) leads were positioned at an acute angle directing towards the left brachial plexus whenever the patient's shoulder was passively abducted. Brachial plexus irritation by the angulated CRT leads was strongly suspected. To relieve the acute angulation, we had to adjust the entry site of the LV and RA leads from the distal to the proximal axillary vein using the cut-down method. After successful lead repositioning, the neuropathic pain improved rapidly. Although transvenous pacing lead-induced nerve injury is not a frequent complication, this possibility should be kept in mind by the operators.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Effectiveness of Placement of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Leads in the Axillary Vein Guided by Contrast Venography

          Despite evidence of an increased incidence of lead fracture, the infraclavicular subclavian approach remains the dominant approach for placement of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. Although this complication can be prevented by lead placement in the cephalic vein or by recently described approaches for lead placement in the axillary vein, these approaches have not gained widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an alternative technique for lead placement that uses contrast-guided venipuncture of the axillary vein with a 5Fr micropuncture introducer set. A total of 50 patients underwent an attempt at placement of pacemaker or implantable defibrillator leads via the axillary vein using this new technique. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on whether the initial attempt at axillary vein access was performed medial or lateral to the rib cage margin. Lead placement was successfully accomplished in 49 of the 50 patients using this technique. Initial success was achieved in each of 25 patients randomized to the medial approach compared with 18 of 24 patients randomized to the lateral approach to the axillary vein (75%). In each of the 6 patients in whom the initial technique failed, lead placement was subsequently achieved with the medial approach. In addition to a higher initial success rate, the medial approach was determined to be preferable as evidenced by a shorter lead placement time, a smaller number of contrast injections, and a reduced requirement for additional micropuncture guidewires. There were no major complications associated with either approach. Contrast-guided venipuncture of the axillary vein is a safe and effective approach to placement of endocardial leads.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phrenic nerve injury and diaphragmatic paralysis following pacemaker pulse generator replacement.

            Diaphragmatic paralysis (DP) is a common condition. It can be unilateral or bilateral and the diagnosis is usually based on a clinical and radiological findings. Bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis is usually symptomatic with dyspnea and acute respiratory failure while unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis is typically asymptomatic and when present, symptoms usually depend on the presence of underlying pulmonary or neurologic disease. DP can be the result of various chest conditions that affect the phrenic nerve such as tumors, vascular abnormalities or traumatic incidents during surgery as well as blunt or penetrating chest or neck injuries. We report a unique case of phrenic nerve injury and unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis secondary to pacemaker pulse generator replacement that was successfully treated with diaphragmatic plication.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of the axillary venous approach and subclavian venous approach for efficacy of permanent pacemaker implantation. 8-Year follow-up results.

               Long-term data on lead complication rates are limited for both the axillary and subclavian venous approaches for permanent pacemaker implantation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean Circ J
                Korean Circ J
                KCJ
                Korean Circulation Journal
                The Korean Society of Cardiology
                1738-5520
                1738-5555
                September 2015
                25 June 2015
                : 45
                : 5
                : 428-431
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
                [2 ]Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
                [3 ]Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jong Sung Park, MD, Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Medical Center, 26 Daesingongwon-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 49201, Korea. Tel: 82-51-240-5040, Fax: 82-51-240-5852, thinkmed@ 123456dau.ac.kr
                Article
                10.4070/kcj.2015.45.5.428
                4580703
                80ef840a-dfbf-4675-a8ad-e3c047648655
                Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Cardiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 September 2014
                : 17 October 2014
                : 31 October 2014
                Categories
                Case Report

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                cardiac resynchronization therapy,complications,peripheral nerve injuries,brachial plexus

                Comments

                Comment on this article