13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What do external consultants from private and not-for-profit companies offer healthcare commissioners? A qualitative study of knowledge exchange

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The use of external consultants from private and not-for-profit providers in the National Health Service (NHS) is intended to improve the quality of commissioning. The aim of this study was to learn about the support offered to healthcare commissioners, how external consultants and their clients work together and the perceived impact on the quality of commissioning.

          Setting

          NHS commissioning organisations and private and not-for-profit providers.

          Design

          Mixed methods case study of eight cases.

          Data collection

          92 interviews with external consultants (n=36), their clients (n=47) and others (n=9). Observation of 25 training events and meetings. Documentation, for example, meeting minutes and reports.

          Analysis

          Constant comparison. Data were coded, summarised and analysed by the research team with a coding framework to facilitate cross-case comparison.

          Results

          In the four contracts presented here, external providers offered technical solutions (eg, software tools), outsourcing and expertise including project management, data interpretation and brokering relationships with experts. In assessing perceived impact on quality of commissioning, two contracts had limited value, one had short-term benefits and one provided short and longer term benefits. Contracts with commissioners actively learning, embedding and applying new skills were more valued. Other elements of success were: (1) addressing clearly agreed problems of relevance to managerial and operational staff (2) solutions co-produced at all organisational levels (3) external consultants working directly with clients to interpret data outputs to inform locally contextualised commissioning strategies. Without explicit knowledge exchange strategies, outsourcing commissioning to external providers resulted in the NHS clients becoming dependent.

          Conclusions

          NHS commissioning will be disadvantaged if commissioners both fail to learn in the short term from the knowledge of external providers and in the longer term lose local skills. Knowledge exchange mechanisms are a vital component of commissioning and should be embedded in external provider contracts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          World class commissioning: a health policy chimera?

          Chris Ham (2008)
          The health reforms in England have entered a phase in which greater emphasis is being placed on market-like mechanisms. The ability of the commissioners of care to negotiate on equal terms with providers will be of critical importance in the emerging market. The government has set out plans to develop 'world class commissioning' and this essay reviews experience in Europe, New Zealand and the United States to understand what is involved in working towards this goal. The evidence reviewed shows that in no system is commissioning done consistently well and highlights the obstacles to the development of world class commissioning. The reasons for this centre on the complexity of health care and the inherent difficulty of commissioning health services in publicly financed systems. Commissioners will need to be able to access a range of expertise and are likely to incur significant expenditure in so doing. There are warning signs from other systems of health reforms that result in adversarial and legalistic approaches, and do not give sufficient attention to relational contracting. Even if world class commissioning is developed, it may fall short of its potential in the absence of other changes in the design of the reforms, such as autonomous providers and appropriate payment systems. In view of these challenges, a more promising alternative would be to develop competing integrated systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The practice of commissioning healthcare from a private provider: learning from an in-depth case study

            Background The direction of health service policy in England is for more diversification in the design, commissioning and provision of health care services. The case study which is the subject of this paper was selected specifically because of the partnering with a private sector organisation to manage whole system redesign of primary care and to support the commissioning of services for people with long term conditions at risk of unplanned hospital admissions and associated service provision activities. The case study forms part of a larger Department of Health funded project on the practice of commissioning which aims to find the best means of achieving a balance between monitoring and control on the one hand, and flexibility and innovation on the other, and to find out what modes of commissioning are most effective in different circumstances and for different services. Methods A single case study method was adopted to explore multiple perspectives of the complexities and uniqueness of a public-private partnership referred to as the “Livewell project”. 10 single depth interviews were carried out with key informants across the GP practices, the PCT and the private provider involved in the initiative. Results The main themes arising from single depth interviews with the case study participants include a particular understanding about the concept of commissioning in the context of primary care, ambitions for primary care redesign, the importance of key roles and strong relationships, issues around the adoption and spread of innovation, and the impact of the current changes to commissioning arrangements. The findings identified a close and high trust relationship between GPs (the commissioners) and the private commissioning support and provider firm. The antecedents to the contract for the project being signed indicated the importance of leveraging external contacts and influence (resource dependency theory). Conclusions The study has surfaced issues around innovation adoption in the healthcare context. The case identifies ‘negotiated order’, managerial performance of providers and disciplinary control as three media of power used in combination by commissioners. The case lends support for stewardship and resource dependency governance theories as explanations of the underpinning conditions for effective commissioning in certain circumstances within a quasi marketised healthcare system.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              BMJ Open
              BMJ Open
              bmjopen
              bmjopen
              BMJ Open
              BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
              2044-6055
              2015
              5 February 2015
              : 5
              : 2
              : e006558
              Affiliations
              [1 ]School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol , Bristol, UK
              [2 ]School of Policy Studies, University of Bristol , Bristol, UK
              [3 ]Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
              [4 ]Southampton Business School, University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
              [5 ]South West Commissioning Support Unit , Bristol, UK
              [6 ]Faculty of Health Sciences, Southampton, UK
              Author notes
              [Correspondence to ] Dr Lesley Wye; lesley.wye@ 123456bristol.ac.uk
              Article
              bmjopen-2014-006558
              10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006558
              4342588
              25716174
              80fd41a8-a0fc-4920-a27c-ee38d108220e
              Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

              This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

              History
              : 5 September 2014
              : 30 October 2014
              : 7 January 2015
              Categories
              Health Services Research
              Research
              1506
              1704
              1703

              Medicine
              Medicine

              Comments

              Comment on this article