42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neural Correlates of True Memory, False Memory, and Deception

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine whether neural activity can differentiate between true memory, false memory, and deception. Subjects heard a series of semantically related words and were later asked to make a recognition judgment of old words, semantically related nonstudied words (lures for false recognition), and unrelated new words. They were also asked to make a deceptive response to half of the old and unrelated new words. There were 3 main findings. First, consistent with the notion that executive function supports deception, 2 types of deception (pretending to know and pretending not to know) recruited prefrontal activity. Second, consistent with the sensory reactivation hypothesis, the difference between true recognition and false recognition was found in the left temporoparietal regions probably engaged in the encoding of auditorily presented words. Third, the left prefrontal cortex was activated during pretending to know relative to correct rejection and false recognition, whereas the right anterior hippocampus was activated during false recognition relative to correct rejection and pretending to know. These findings indicate that fMRI can detect the difference in brain activity between deception and false memory despite the fact that subjects respond with “I know” to novel events in both processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Memory and consciousness.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Source monitoring.

              A framework for understanding source monitoring and relevant empirical evidence is described, and several related phenomena are discussed: old-new recognition, indirect tests, eyewitness testimony, misattributed familiarity, cryptomnesia, and incorporation of fiction into fact. Disruptions in source monitoring (e.g., from confabulation, amnesia, and aging) and the brain regions that are involved are also considered, and source monitoring within a general memory architecture is discussed. It is argued that source monitoring is based on qualities of experience resulting from combinations of perceptual and reflective processes, usually requires relatively differentiated phenomenal experience, and involves attributions varying in deliberateness. These judgments evaluate information according to flexible criteria and are subject to error and disruption. Furthermore, diencephalic and temporal regions may play different roles in source monitoring than do frontal regions of the brain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cereb Cortex
                cercor
                cercor
                Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)
                Oxford University Press
                1047-3211
                1460-2199
                December 2008
                27 March 2008
                27 March 2008
                : 18
                : 12
                : 2811-2819
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
                [2 ]Brain Science Research Center, Tamagawa University Brain Science Institute, Tokyo, Japan
                [3 ]Division of Cyclotron Nuclear Medicine, Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Nobuhito Abe, PhD, Department of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan. Email: abe-n@ 123456mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp .
                Article
                10.1093/cercor/bhn037
                2583150
                18372290
                81041750-0907-4631-ae40-90b1afc52269
                © 2008 The Authors

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Neurology
                false recognition,medial temporal lobe,prefrontal cortex,lying,fmri
                Neurology
                false recognition, medial temporal lobe, prefrontal cortex, lying, fmri

                Comments

                Comment on this article