Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience

Sample Size, Humans, Neurosciences, Probability, Reproducibility of Results

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      A study with low statistical power has a reduced chance of detecting a true effect, but it is less well appreciated that low power also reduces the likelihood that a statistically significant result reflects a true effect. Here, we show that the average statistical power of studies in the neurosciences is very low. The consequences of this include overestimates of effect size and low reproducibility of results. There are also ethical dimensions to this problem, as unreliable research is inefficient and wasteful. Improving reproducibility in neuroscience is a key priority and requires attention to well-established but often ignored methodological principles.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      10.1038/nrn3475
      23571845

      Chemistry

      Sample Size, Humans, Neurosciences, Probability, Reproducibility of Results

      Comments

      Comment on this article