1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Video Education Reduces Pain and Anxiety Levels in Cancer Patients Who First Use Fentanyl Transdermal Patch: A Randomized Controlled Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          We sought to evaluate the efficacy of using a quick response (QR) code within video education to guide proper use of fentanyl transdermal patches and control pain, depression, and anxiety levels in cancer patients.

          Methods

          Patients using a fentanyl transdermal patch for the first time were enrolled in the study and then given an information leaflet as well as an informed consent form. We asked them to complete the first questionnaire (Q1) prior to first use of the fentanyl transdermal patch, and then used a random number table to randomize those who completed it into two groups. Participants in group A received a QR code (to make it easier for them to obtain additional video information) and a traditional information leaflet, whereas those in group B (control group) only received a traditional information leaflet. Thereafter, we requested all participants to complete standard questionnaires, which comprised a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), a Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), as well as a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The resulting continuous (with a normal distribution) and categorical data were analyzed using Student’s t- and chi-square tests, respectively. We also recorded parameters such as NRS, STAI, and HADS, as well as the frequency of rescue medication in both groups.

          Results

          A total of 154 cancer patients who first used a fentanyl transdermal patch were recruited during the study period, from April to May 2020. Among these, 138 completed follow-up, with 70 and 68 in group A and B, respectively. Participants in both groups had similar baseline and clinical characteristics, whereas significant differences were observed between the groups with regard to the other parameters. Specifically, participants in group A recorded a lower STAI state (38.2 vs 38.9, P=0.027) and HADS (3.9 vs 4.2, P=0.001) anxiety scores, as well as NRS (2.1 vs 2.4, P=0.025) and frequency of rescue medication (0.4 vs 1.4, P<0.001) than those in group B, following 14 days of using a fentanyl transdermal patch.

          Conclusion

          Our results indicated that incorporating a QR code within additional video education leads to proper use of a fentanyl transdermal patch and relieves pain and anxiety levels in patients with cancer. Based on this, we recommend a new style of education during care of cancer patients who first use a fentanyl transdermal patch.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC.

          Here we provide the updated version of the guidelines of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) on the use of opioids for the treatment of cancer pain. The update was undertaken by the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative. Previous EAPC guidelines were reviewed and compared with other currently available guidelines, and consensus recommendations were created by formal international expert panel. The content of the guidelines was defined according to several topics, each of which was assigned to collaborators who developed systematic literature reviews with a common methodology. The recommendations were developed by a writing committee that combined the evidence derived from the systematic reviews with the panellists' evaluations in a co-authored process, and were endorsed by the EAPC Board of Directors. The guidelines are presented as a list of 16 evidence-based recommendations developed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A randomized, clinical trial of education or motivational-interviewing-based coaching compared to usual care to improve cancer pain management.

            To test the effectiveness of two interventions compared to usual care in decreasing attitudinal barriers to cancer pain management, decreasing pain intensity, and improving functional status and quality of life (QOL). Randomized clinical trial. Six outpatient oncology clinics (three Veterans Affairs [VA] facilities, one county hospital, and one community-based practice in California, and one VA clinic in New Jersey)Sample: 318 adults with various types of cancer-related pain. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control, standardized education, or coaching. Patients in the education and coaching groups viewed a video and received a pamphlet on managing cancer pain. In addition, patients in the coaching group participated in four telephone sessions with an advanced practice nurse interventionist using motivational interviewing techniques to decrease attitudinal barriers to cancer pain management. Questionnaires were completed at baseline and six weeks after the final telephone calls. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate for differences in study outcomes among the three groups. Pain intensity, pain relief, pain interference, attitudinal barriers, functional status, and QOL. Attitudinal barrier scores did not change over time among groups. Patients randomized to the coaching group reported significant improvement in their ratings of pain-related interference with function, as well as general health, vitality, and mental health. Although additional evaluation is needed, coaching may be a useful strategy to help patients decrease attitudinal barriers toward cancer pain management and to better manage their cancer pain. By using motivational interviewing techniques, advanced practice oncology nurses can help patients develop an appropriate plan of care to decrease pain and other symptoms.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pain and its interference with daily activities in medical oncology outpatients.

              Pain prevalence at various stages of cancer ranges from 27% to 60% for outpatients. Yet, how pain is managed in this patient group is poorly understood.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                dddt
                dddt
                Drug Design, Development and Therapy
                Dove
                1177-8881
                25 August 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 3477-3483
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine , Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College , Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Yuefeng Rao Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine , 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou310003, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-571-8723-6531 Email raoyf@zju.edu.cn
                Xiaohong Mao Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College , 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou310014, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-15990151723 Email maoxhzhz@163.com
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                264112
                10.2147/DDDT.S264112
                7457823
                © 2020 Ye et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, References: 20, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article