11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Hepatitis C elimination among people who inject drugs: Challenges and recommendations for action within a health systems framework

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The burden of hepatitis C infection is considerable among people who inject drugs (PWID), with an estimated prevalence of greater than 40%, representing an estimated 5.6 million people who have recently injected drugs living with hepatitis C infection. As such, PWID are a priority population for enhancing prevention, testing, linkage to care, treatment and follow-up care in order to meet World Health Organization (WHO) hepatitis C elimination goals by 2030. There are many barriers to enhancing hepatitis C prevention and care among PWID including; poor global coverage of harm reduction services, restrictive drug policies and criminalization of drug use, poor access to health services, low hepatitis C testing, linkage to care and treatment, restrictions for accessing DAA therapy, and the lack of national strategies and government investment to support WHO elimination goals. On 5 September 2017, the International Network of Hepatitis in Substance Users (INHSU) held a roundtable panel of international experts to discuss remaining challenges and future priorities for action from a health systems perspective. The WHO health systems framework comprises six core components; service delivery, health workforce, health information systems, medical procurement, health systems financing, and leadership and governance. Communication has been proposed as a seventh key element which promotes the central role of affected community engagement. This review paper presents recommended strategies for eliminating hepatitis C as a major public health threat among PWID and outlines future priorities for action within a health systems framework.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers.

          The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model was developed to improve access to care for underserved populations with complex health problems such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. With the use of video-conferencing technology, the ECHO program trains primary care providers to treat complex diseases. We conducted a prospective cohort study comparing treatment for HCV infection at the University of New Mexico (UNM) HCV clinic with treatment by primary care clinicians at 21 ECHO sites in rural areas and prisons in New Mexico. A total of 407 patients with chronic HCV infection who had received no previous treatment for the infection were enrolled. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response. A total of 57.5% of the patients treated at the UNM HCV clinic (84 of 146 patients) and 58.2% of those treated at ECHO sites (152 of 261 patients) had a sustained viral response (difference in rates between sites, 0.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -9.2 to 10.7; P=0.89). Among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, the rate of sustained viral response was 45.8% (38 of 83 patients) at the UNM HCV clinic and 49.7% (73 of 147 patients) at ECHO sites (P=0.57). Serious adverse events occurred in 13.7% of the patients at the UNM HCV clinic and in 6.9% of the patients at ECHO sites. The results of this study show that the ECHO model is an effective way to treat HCV infection in underserved communities. Implementation of this model would allow other states and nations to treat a greater number of patients infected with HCV than they are currently able to treat. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and others.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection among people who are actively injecting drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            Although guidelines recommend that people who inject drugs (PWID) should not be excluded from hepatitis C (HCV) treatment, some services remain reluctant to treat PWID. The aim of this review was to investigate sustained virologic response (SVR), adherence, discontinuation, and HCV reinfection among PWID. A search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (between 2002 and January 2012) was conducted for primary articles/conference abstracts examining HCV treatment outcomes in PWID. Meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled estimates of SVR, adherence, discontinuation, and HCV reinfection. Ten primary articles and 1 conference abstract met the inclusion criteria. Across 6 studies (comprising 314 drug users, of whom 141 [45%] were PWID), pooled SVR was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50%-61%) for all genotypes, 37% (95% CI, 26%-48%) for genotypes 1/4, and 67% (95% CI, 56%-78%) for genotypes 2/3. Pooled 80/80/80 adherence was 82% (95% CI, 74%-89%) across 2 studies, and pooled treatment discontinuation was 22% (95% CI, 16%-27%) across 4 studies. Across 5 studies (comprising 131 drug users) examining reinfection, pooled risk was 2.4 (95% CI, .9-6.1) per 100 person-years. HCV treatment outcomes are acceptable in PWID, supporting treatment guidelines. The pooled estimate of HCV reinfection risk was low, but there was considerable uncertainty around this estimate. Further studies on the risk of reinfection are needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of HCV treatment in PWID.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for hepatitis C virus infection in people with recent injection drug use (SIMPLIFY): an open-label, single-arm, phase 4, multicentre trial

              Despite revised guidelines that no longer exclude people who inject drugs (PWID) from treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, many clinicians are reluctant to treat recent PWID. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir therapy in people with chronic HCV infection and recent injection drug use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Liver International
                Liver Int
                Wiley
                14783223
                January 2019
                January 2019
                September 22 2018
                : 39
                : 1
                : 20-30
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, and Sexual Health Medicine; Sydney New South Wales Australia
                [2 ]Disease Elimination Program; Burnet Institute; Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [3 ]Centre for Social Research in Health; UNSW Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
                [4 ]CHUM Research Centre (CRCHUM); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal; Montréal Quebec Canada
                [5 ]Division of Global Public Health; University of California; San Diego California
                [6 ]Department of Infectious Diseases; Odense University Hospital; Odense Denmark
                [7 ]Department of Infectious Diseases; Institute of Clinical Medicine; Akershus University Hospital; University of Oslo; Oslo Norway
                [8 ]The Kirby Institute; UNSW Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
                [9 ]Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine; School of Medicine; University of Dundee; Dundee UK
                [10 ]Population Health Sciences; Bristol Medical School; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
                [11 ]Australian Injecting & Illicit Drug Users League; Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
                [12 ]University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville; Greenville South Carolina
                [13 ]Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Illnesses; University Medical Centre Ljubljana; Ljubljana Slovenia
                [14 ]Faculty of Medicine; University of Ljubljana; Ljubljana Slovenia
                [15 ]Arud Centres for Addiction Medicine; Zürich Switzerland
                [16 ]Department of Gastroenterology; Institute of Clinical Medicine; Oslo University Hospital; University of Oslo; Oslo Norway
                [17 ]Philadelphia FIGHT; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
                [18 ]Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal); Hospital Clínic; University of Barcelona; Barcelona Spain
                Article
                10.1111/liv.13949
                6868526
                30157316
                818402ca-1a30-40f0-8d2c-b9485601d892
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article