8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Anaphylactoid Reactions to Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine during Treatment for Acetaminophen Poisoning

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d217201e396"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d217201e397">Background</h5> <p id="Par1">Anaphylactoid reactions to intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) are well-recognized adverse events during treatment for acetaminophen (APAP) poisoning. Uncertainty exists regarding their incidence, severity, risk factors, and management. We sought to determine the incidence, risk factors, and treatment of anaphylactoid reactions to IV NAC in a large, national cohort of patients admitted to hospital for acetaminophen overdose. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d217201e401"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d217201e402">Methods</h5> <p id="d217201e404">This retrospective medical record review included all patients initiated on the 21-h IV NAC protocol for acetaminophen poisoning in 34 Canadian hospitals between February 1980 and November 2005. The primary outcome was any anaphylactoid reaction, defined as cutaneous (urticaria, pruritus, angioedema) or systemic (hypotension, respiratory symptoms). We examined the incidence, severity and timing of these reactions, and their association with patient and overdose characteristics using multivariable analysis. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d217201e406"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d217201e407">Results</h5> <p id="d217201e409">An anaphylactoid reaction was documented in 528 (8.2%) of 6455 treatment courses, of which 398 (75.4%) were cutaneous. Five hundred four (95.4%) reactions occurred during the first 5 h. Of 403 patients administered any medication for these reactions, 371 (92%) received an antihistamine. Being female (adjusted OR 1.24 [95%CI 1.08, 1.42]) and having taken a single, acute overdose (1.24 [95%CI 1.10, 1.39]) were each associated with more severe reactions, whereas higher serum APAP concentrations were associated with fewer reactions (0.79 [95%CI 0.68, 0.92]). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="d217201e411"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d217201e412">Conclusion</h5> <p id="d217201e414">Anaphylactoid reactions to the 21-h IV NAC protocol were uncommon and involved primarily cutaneous symptoms. While the protective effects of higher APAP concentrations are of interest in understanding the pathophysiology, none of the associations identified are strong enough to substantially alter the threshold for NAC initiation. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adverse reactions associated with acetylcysteine.

          Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is one of the most common agents deliberately ingested in self-poisoning episodes and a leading cause of acute liver failure in the western world. Acetylcysteine is widely acknowledged as the antidote of choice for paracetamol poisoning, but its use is not without risk. Adverse reactions, often leading to treatment delay, are frequently associated with both intravenous and oral acetylcysteine and are a common source of concern among treating physicians.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Risk factors and mechanisms of anaphylactoid reactions to acetylcysteine in acetaminophen overdose

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lower incidence of anaphylactoid reactions to N-acetylcysteine in patients with high acetaminophen concentrations after overdose.

              Mechanisms responsible for anaphylactoid reactions to N-acetylcysteine (NAC) are poorly understood, and acetaminophen itself may play an important role. The present study examined the relationship between serum acetaminophen concentrations and risk of anaphylactoid reactions. Prospective study of adverse reactions to NAC administered according to standardized clinical protocols in patients who present to hospital after acute acetaminophen overdose. Subgroups were defined by serum acetaminophen concentrations 0 to 100 mg/L, 101 to 150 mg/L, 151 to 200 mg/L, 201 to 300 mg/L, and >300 mg/L. There were 362 patients, and anaphylactoid reactions occurred in 14.9%. Anaphylactoid reactions occurred less commonly in patients with high serum acetaminophen concentrations (p = 0.046 by Cochran-Armitage trend test) and high equivalent 4 h acetaminophen concentrations (p = 0.004). High serum acetaminophen concentrations were associated with fewer anaphylactoid reactions, suggesting that these might in some way be protective. The biological basis needs further exploration so as to allow a better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for adverse reactions to NAC treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Medical Toxicology
                J. Med. Toxicol.
                Springer Nature
                1556-9039
                1937-6995
                June 2018
                February 8 2018
                June 2018
                : 14
                : 2
                : 120-127
                Article
                10.1007/s13181-018-0653-9
                5962465
                29423816
                81fa048d-2c8c-4baf-ae69-248af28b2db5
                © 2018

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article