3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Multiple-Qubit Errors: (I) Characterization

      Preprint
      , , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coherence in an open quantum system is degraded through its interaction with a bath. This decoherence can be avoided by restricting the dynamics of the system to special decoherence-free subspaces. These subspaces are usually constructed under the assumption of spatially symmetric system-bath coupling. Here we show that decoherence-free subspaces may appear without spatial symmetry. Instead, we consider a model of system-bath interactions in which to first order only multiple-qubit coupling to the bath is present, with single-qubit system-bath coupling absent. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the appearance of decoherence-free states in this model, and give a number of examples. In a sequel paper we show how to perform universal and fault tolerant quantum computation on the decoherence-free subspaces considered in this paper.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          1999-08-18
          2000-07-05
          Article
          10.1103/PhysRevA.63.022306
          quant-ph/9908064
          8250f1e5-237a-469c-871f-02779a896deb
          History
          Custom metadata
          Phys. Rev. A 63, 022306 (2001)
          18 pages, no figures. Major changes. Section on universal fault tolerant computation removed. This section contained a crucial error. A new paper [quant-ph/0007013] presents the correct analysis
          quant-ph

          Quantum physics & Field theory
          Quantum physics & Field theory

          Comments

          Comment on this article