16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      High-volume haemofiltration in human septic shock.

      Intensive Care Medicine
      APACHE, Adult, Aged, Cytokines, blood, Female, Hemodynamics, drug effects, Hemofiltration, methods, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, classification, mortality, therapy, Norepinephrine, therapeutic use, Shock, Septic

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To evaluate whether high volume haemofiltration improves haemodynamics and affects serum cytokine and complement concentrations in human septic shock. Randomized cross-over clinical trial in a tertiary intensive care unit. Eleven patients with septic shock and multi-organ failure. Patients were assigned to either 8 h of high-volume haemofiltration (HVHF; 6 l/h) or 8 h of standard continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH; 1 l/h) in random order. We measured changes in haemodynamic variables, dose of norepinephrine required to maintain a mean arterial pressure greater than 70 mmHg and plasma concentrations of complement anaphylatoxins and several cytokines. An 8-h period of HVHF was associated with a greater reduction in norepinephrine requirements than a similar period of CVVH (median reduction: 10.5 vs. 1.0 microg/min; p = 0.01; median percentage reduction: 68 vs. 7%; p = 0.02). Both therapies were associated with a temporary reduction (p < 0.01) in the plasma concentration of C3a, C5a, and interleukin 10 within 2 h of initiation. HVHF was associated with a greater reduction in the area under the curve for C3a and C5a (p < 0.01). The concentration of the measured soluble mediators in the ultrafiltrate was negligible. HVHF decreases vasopressor requirements in human septic shock and affects anaphylatoxin levels differently than standard CVVH.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article