18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Nonantibiotic Small Molecule Cyslabdan Enhances the Potency of β-Lactams against MRSA by Inhibiting Pentaglycine Interpeptide Bridge Synthesis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The nonantibiotic small molecule cyslabdan, a labdan-type diterpene produced by Streptomyces sp. K04-0144, markedly potentiated the activity of the β-lactam drug imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). To study the mechanism of action of cyslabdan, the proteins that bind to cyslabdan were investigated in an MRSA lysate, which led to the identification of FemA, which is involved in the synthesis of the pentaglycine interpeptide bridge of the peptidoglycan of MRSA. Furthermore, binding assay of cyslabdan to FemB and FemX with the function similar to FemA revealed that cyslabdan had an affinity for FemB but not FemX. In an enzyme-based assay, cyslabdan inhibited FemA activity, where as did not affected FemX and FemB activities. Nonglycyl and monoglycyl murein monomers were accumulated by cyslabdan in the peptidoglycan of MRSA cell walls. These findings indicated that cyslabdan primarily inhibits FemA, thereby suppressing pentaglycine interpeptide bridge synthesis. This protein is a key factor in the determination of β-lactam resistance in MRSA, and our findings provide a new strategy for combating MRSA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mechanism of synergy between epigallocatechin gallate and beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

            Compared to MICs (more than 800 microg/ml) of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg) against Escherchia coli, MICs of EGCg against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA) were 100 microg/ml or less. Furthermore, less than 25 microg EGCg per ml obviously reversed the high level resistance of MRSA to all types of tested beta-lactams, including benzylpenicillin, oxacillin, methicillin, ampicillin, and cephalexin. EGCg also induced a supersusceptibility to beta-lactams in MSSA which does not express mecA, encoding penicillin-binding protein 2' (PBP2'). The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices of the tested beta-lactams against 25 isolates of MRSA were from 0.126 to 0.625 in combination with 6.25, 12.5 or 25 microg of EGCg per ml. However, no synergism was observed between EGCg and ampicillin against E. coli. EGCg largely reduced the tolerance of MRSA and MSSA to high ionic strength and low osmotic pressure in their external atmosphere, indicating damage of the cell wall. Unlike dextran and lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan from S. aureus blocked both the antibacterial activity of EGCg and the synergism between EGCg and oxacillin, suggesting a direct binding of EGCg with peptidoglycan on the cell wall. EGCg showed a synergistic effect with DL-cycloserine (an inhibitor of cell wall synthesis unrelated to PBP2') but additive or indifferent effect with inhibitors of protein and nuclear acid synthesis. EGCg did not suppress either PBP2' mRNA expression or PBP2' production, as confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR and a semiquantitative PBP2' latex agglutination assay, indicating an irrelevance between the synergy and PBP2' production. In summary, both EGCg and beta-lactams directly or indirectly attack the same site, peptidoglycan on the cell wall. EGCg synergizes the activity of beta-lactams against MRSA owing to interference with the integrity of the cell wall through direct binding to peptidoglycan.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lipid II is an intrinsic component of the pore induced by nisin in bacterial membranes.

              The peptidoglycan layers surrounding bacterial membranes are essential for bacterial cell survival and provide an important target for antibiotics. Many antibiotics have mechanisms of action that involve binding to Lipid II, the prenyl chain-linked donor of the peptidoglycan building blocks. One of these antibiotics, the pore-forming peptide nisin uses Lipid II as a receptor molecule to increase its antimicrobial efficacy dramatically. Nisin is the first example of a targeted membrane-permeabilizing peptide antibiotic. However, it was not known whether Lipid II functions only as a receptor to recruit nisin to bacterial membranes, thus increasing its specificity for bacterial cells, or whether it also plays a role in pore formation. We have developed a new method to produce large amounts of Lipid II and variants thereof so that we can address the role of the lipid-linked disaccharide in the activity of nisin. We show here that Lipid II is not only the receptor for nisin but an intrinsic component of the pore formed by nisin, and we present a new model for the pore complex that includes Lipid II.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2012
                6 November 2012
                08 November 2012
                : 7
                : 11
                : e48981
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan
                [2 ]Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
                [3 ]Kitasato Institute for Life Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan
                The Scripps Research Institute and Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., United States of America
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: HT. Performed the experiments: YT DM NK. Analyzed the data: NK HGS TS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HI. Wrote the paper: NK TS HT. Operated the LC-MS/MS instrument: YS.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-08836
                10.1371/journal.pone.0048981
                3490914
                23166602
                82bde51d-4838-49a0-bcc3-11d367904f38
                Copyright @ 2012

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 27 March 2012
                : 3 October 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                This study was supported in part by grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation (to H.T.) and the Takeda Science Foundation (to N.K.) and Kakenhi grants 21310146 (to H.T.) and 23790020 (to N.K.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Biochemistry
                Drug Discovery
                Small Molecules
                Biotechnology
                Drug Discovery
                Small Molecules
                Microbiology
                Microbial Control
                Chemistry
                Chemical Biology
                Organic Chemistry
                Organic Compounds
                Small Molecules
                Medicine
                Drugs and Devices
                Drug Research and Development
                Drug Discovery

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article