23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Expression of Two Basic mRNA Biomarkers in Peripheral Blood of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Detected by Real-Time RT-PCR, Individually and Simultaneously

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Although extensive research has been conducted on lung cancer markers, a singular clinically applicable marker has not been found yet. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and the specificity of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA and lung-specific X protein (LUNX) mRNA biomarkers in peripheral blood to detect lung cancer individually and simultaneously. Methods: Thirty patients affected by lung cancer and 30 healthy individuals were studied in this research. Three vials of cDNA were made from each sample after taking peripheral blood samples and extracting total RNA. Each sample was examined by the real-time RT-PCR technique. The result from each vial was then compared with the sensitivity of overall marker. Results: The CEA mRNA was positive in 24 out of 30 lung cancer patients. Hence, its sensitivity was determined at 80%, differing significantly from that observed in healthy individuals, where 11 positive cases were seen. The overall sensitivity of this marker was significantly associated with positivity in vials 2 and 3 but not in vial 1. The LUNX mRNA was positive in 21 out of 30 patients, indicating 70% sensitivity. This finding significantly differed from that in healthy individuals. The overall sensitivity of this marker was significantly associated with positivity in vials 1 and 3, but not in vial 2. In 93.3% of the patients, at least one positive marker was observed. Conclusion: The mentioned mRNA could be suggested as sensitive and specific markers in peripheral blood for primary diagnosis of lung cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Small-cell lung cancer.

          Small-cell lung carcinoma is an aggressive form of lung cancer that is strongly associated with cigarette smoking and has a tendency for early dissemination. Increasing evidence has implicated autocrine growth loops, proto-oncogenes, and tumour-suppressor genes in its development. At presentation, the vast majority of patients are symptomatic, and imaging typically reveals a hilar mass. Pathology, in most cases of samples obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy, should be undertaken by pathologists with pulmonary expertise, with the provision of additional tissue for immunohistochemical stains as needed. Staging should aim to identify any evidence of distant disease, by imaging of the chest, upper abdomen, head, and bones as appropriate. Limited-stage disease should be treated with etoposide and cisplatin and concurrent early chest irradiation. All patients who achieve complete remission should be considered for treatment with prophylactic cranial irradiation, owing to the high frequency of brain metastases in this disease. Extensive-stage disease should be managed by combination chemotherapy, with a regimen such as etoposide and cisplatin administered for four to six cycles. Thereafter, patients with progressive or recurrent disease should be treated with additional chemotherapy. For patients who survive long term, careful monitoring for development of a second primary tumour is necessary, with further investigation and treatment as appropriate.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical practice. The solitary pulmonary nodule.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical uses of tumor markers: a critical review.

              Tumor markers are molecules that indicate the presence of malignancy. They are potentially useful in cancer screening, aiding diagnosis, assessing prognosis, predicting in advance a likely response to therapy, and monitoring patients with diagnosed disease. Because of the low prevalence of most cancers in the general population and the limited sensitivity and specificity of available markers, these tests alone are generally of little value in screening for cancer in healthy subjects. Currently, however, PSA in combination with digital rectal examination and CA 125 together with ultrasound are undergoing evaluation as screening modalities for prostate and ovarian cancer, respectively. Again, because of a lack of sensitivity and specificity, markers are rarely of use in the early diagnosis of cancer. As prognostic indicators, markers may provide information that is independent of traditionally used factors or within subgroups defined by traditional criteria, for example, urokinase plasminogen activator in node-negative breast cancer. At present, the best available marker for predicting response to therapy is the estrogen receptor for selecting hormone-sensitive breast cancers. Many different markers can be used in the surveillance of patients with diagnosed malignancies, the most useful of these being HCG in trophoblastic disease and both AFP and HCG for nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors. In general, the currently available tumor markers lack sensitivity for early cancer and specificity for malignancy. The goal of future research should be to develop more sensitive and specific markers, especially for the common cancers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Iran Biomed J
                Iran. Biomed. J
                IBJ
                Iranian Biomedical Journal
                Pasteur Institute of Iran (Tehran, Iran )
                1028-852X
                2008-823X
                January 2015
                : 19
                : 1
                : 17-22
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Mycobacteriology Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;
                [2 ] Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran;
                [3 ] Dept. of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran;
                [4 ] Virology Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;
                [5 ] Tobacco Prevention and Control Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;
                [6 ] Iranian Tissue Bank and Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran;
                [7 ] Dental Biomaterial Dept. of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author; Mobile: (+98-912)1324616; Fax: (+98-81) 3838 0464; E-mail: sjam110@yahoo.com
                Article
                10.6091/ibj.1397.2014
                4322228
                25605485
                82f14eaf-8ba2-4d87-b85e-7e66a1bff358

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 February 2014
                : 14 May 2014
                : 19 May 2014
                Categories
                Original Article

                lung neoplasms,rna,carcinoembryonic antigen,sensitivity and specificity

                Comments

                Comment on this article