10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Boechera Genus as a Resource for Apomixis Research

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The genera Boechera (A. Löve et D. Löve) and Arabidopsis, the latter containing the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, belong to the same clade within the Brassicaceae family. Boechera is the only among the more than 370 genera in the Brassicaceae where apomixis is well documented. Apomixis refers to the asexual reproduction through seed, and a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms has great potential for applications in agriculture. The Boechera genus currently includes 110 species (of which 38 are reported to be triploid and thus apomictic), which are distributed mostly in the North America. The apomictic lineages of Boechera occur at both the diploid and triploid level and show signs of a hybridogenic origin, resulting in a modification of their chromosome structure, as reflected by alloploidy, aneuploidy, substitutions of homeologous chromosomes, and the presence of aberrant chromosomes. In this review, we discuss the advantages of the Boechera genus to study apomixis, consider its modes of reproduction as well as the inheritance and possible mechanisms controlling apomixis. We also consider population genetic aspects and a possible role of hybridization at the origin of apomixis in Boechera. The molecular tools available to study Boechera, such as transformation techniques, laser capture microdissection, analysis of transcriptomes etc. are also discussed. We survey available genome assemblies of Boechera spp. and point out the challenges to assemble the highly heterozygous genomes of apomictic species. Due to these challenges, we argue for the application of an alternative reference-free method for the comparative analysis of such genomes, provide an overview of genomic sequencing data in the genus Boechera suitable for such analysis, and provide examples of its application.

          Related collections

          Most cited references141

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE.

          J. Müller (1964)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting.

            It is now well known that incomplete lineage sorting can cause serious difficulties for phylogenetic inference, but little attention has been paid to methods that attempt to overcome these difficulties by explicitly considering the processes that produce them. Here we explore approaches to phylogenetic inference designed to consider retention and sorting of ancestral polymorphism. We examine how the reconstructability of a species (or population) phylogeny is affected by (a) the number of loci used to estimate the phylogeny and (b) the number of individuals sampled per species. Even in difficult cases with considerable incomplete lineage sorting (times between divergences less than 1 N(e) generations), we found the reconstructed species trees matched the "true" species trees in at least three out of five partitions, as long as a reasonable number of individuals per species were sampled. We also studied the tradeoff between sampling more loci versus more individuals. Although increasing the number of loci gives more accurate trees for a given sampling effort with deeper species trees (e.g., total depth of 10 N(e) generations), sampling more individuals often gives better results than sampling more loci with shallower species trees (e.g., depth = 1 N(e)). Taken together, these results demonstrate that gene sequences retain enough signal to achieve an accurate estimate of phylogeny despite widespread incomplete lineage sorting. Continued improvement in our methods to reconstruct phylogeny near the species level will require a shift to a compound model that considers not only nucleotide or character state substitutions, but also the population genetics processes of lineage sorting. [Coalescence; divergence; population; speciation.].
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers.

              Microsatellite markers are routinely used to investigate the genetic structuring of natural populations. The knowledge of how genetic variation is partitioned among populations may have important implications not only in evolutionary biology and ecology, but also in conservation biology. Hence, reliable estimates of population differentiation are crucial to understand the connectivity among populations and represent important tools to develop conservation strategies. The estimation of differentiation is c from Wright's FST and/or Slatkin's RST, an FST -analogue assuming a stepwise mutation model. Both these statistics have their drawbacks. Furthermore, there is no clear consensus over their relative accuracy. In this review, we first discuss the consequences of different temporal and spatial sampling strategies on differentiation estimation. Then, we move to statistical problems directly associated with the estimation of population structuring itself, with particular emphasis on the effects of high mutation rates and mutation patterns of microsatellite loci. Finally, we discuss the biological interpretation of population structuring estimates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                02 April 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 392
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University , Saint Petersburg, Russia
                [2] 2Department of Plant Embryology and Reproductive Biology, Komarov Botanical Institute RAS , Saint Petersburg, Russia
                [3] 3Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, Zürich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [4] 4Bioinformatics Institute , Saint Petersburg, Russia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Fulvio Pupilli, Italian National Research Council (CNR), Italy

                Reviewed by: Andrea Mazzucato, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Italy; Sònia Garcia, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain; Amal Joseph Johnston, Universität Heidelberg, Germany

                *Correspondence: Vladimir Brukhin, vbrukhin@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Plant Breeding, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2019.00392
                6454215
                83299ad5-c305-435b-84ee-84285db107ca
                Copyright © 2019 Brukhin, Osadtchiy, Florez-Rueda, Smetanin, Bakin, Nobre and Grossniklaus.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 November 2018
                : 14 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 170, Pages: 19, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Saint Petersburg State University 10.13039/501100004285
                Funded by: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 10.13039/501100001711
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Review

                Plant science & Botany
                genome assembly,boechera,apomixis,apomeiosis,diplospory,pseudogamy,genomics,heterozygosity

                Comments

                Comment on this article