15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Nitrogen Rates and Time of Application on Yield of Maize: Rainfall Variability Influenced Time of N Application

      ,
      International Journal of Agronomy
      Hindawi Limited

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the fact that maize productivity is relatively better than other major cereal crops, its current productivity is still far below its potential productivity. N rate and time of application are among the major abiotic factors limiting the productivity of the crop. Because of such gaps, the experiment was conducted at Bako Agricultural Research Center in 2013 and 2014 cropping seasons to determine optimum N rate and time of application. Four levels of N rates (46, 69, 92, and 115 N kg ha −1) and four levels ( T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , and T 4 ) of different time of N application were arranged in factorial combinations. Moreover, previously recommended N and the control were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. In 2013, the highest significant biomass yield (21.2 tha −1) was obtained at 115 N kg ha −1 and T 4 followed by 69 N kg ha −1 at T 1 and T 2 and 92 N kg ha −1 at T 2 . In contrast, the highest grain yield in 2013 was obtained at 92 N kg ha −1 at T 2 followed by 115 N kg ha −1 at either T 2 or T 4 and 69 N kg ha −1 at either T 1 or T 3 application time. Interestingly, a significant yield increase by 37% was obtained when 92 N kg ha −1 at the time of T 2 was applied compared to previous recommended 110 N kg ha −1 rate and time of application. In 2014, however, the highest yield was recorded when 92 N kg ha −1 at T 1 was used. Application of 46 N kg ha −1 at T 2 showed statistically similar yield performance when compared with previous N recommendation. The lowest yield was recorded from the control plot in both years. In 2013, the maximum net profit and acceptable marginal rate of return (MMR) were obtained when 92 N kg ha −1 at T 2 was used for maize production during erratic and heavy rainfall distribution, particularly at a time of N application. However, the maximum net benefit (30743 ETB ha −1) and acceptable MRR could be obtained when 92 N kg ha −1 at T 1 was used if the rainfall amount and distribution are relatively uniform. In conclusion, application of 92 N kg ha −1 at T 1 (10–15 DAP and 35–40 DAP) is the best N rate and time of application in good rainy seasons and hence recommended for the end users. However, in the case of erratic and heavy rainy seasons, application of 92 N kg ha −1 at three times application regimes (1/3 N at 10–15 days after planting (DAP), 1/3 N at 35–40 DAP and 55–60 DAP) should be used to get maximum profit and acceptable MRR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Mineral N dynamics, leaching and nitrous oxide losses under maize following two-year improved fallows on a sandy loam soil in Zimbabwe

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Sandy Irrigated Soils

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Journal of Agronomy
                International Journal of Agronomy
                Hindawi Limited
                1687-8159
                1687-8167
                2017
                2017
                : 2017
                :
                : 1-10
                Article
                10.1155/2017/1545280
                833366d9-f9c3-4f4a-8240-e6beeb9bcd0c
                © 2017

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article