103
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improving patient discharge and reducing hospital readmissions by using Intervention Mapping

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is a growing impetus to reorganize the hospital discharge process to reduce avoidable readmissions and costs. The aim of this study was to provide insight into hospital discharge problems and underlying causes, and to give an overview of solutions that guide providers and policy-makers in improving hospital discharge.

          Methods

          The Intervention Mapping framework was used. First, a problem analysis studying the scale, causes, and consequences of ineffective hospital discharge was carried out. The analysis was based on primary data from 26 focus group interviews and 321 individual interviews with patients and relatives, and involved hospital and community care providers. Second, improvements in terms of intervention outcomes, performance objectives and change objectives were specified. Third, 220 experts were consulted and a systematic review of effective discharge interventions was carried out to select theory-based methods and practical strategies required to achieve change and better performance.

          Results

          Ineffective discharge is related to factors at the level of the individual care provider, the patient, the relationship between providers, and the organisational and technical support for care providers. Providers can reduce hospital readmission rates and adverse events by focusing on high-quality discharge information, well-coordinated care, and direct and timely communication with their counterpart colleagues. Patients, or their carers, should participate in the discharge process and be well aware of their health status and treatment. Assessment by hospital care providers whether discharge information is accurate and understood by patients and their community counterparts, are important examples of overcoming identified barriers to effective discharge. Discharge templates, medication reconciliation, a liaison nurse or pharmacist, regular site visits and teach-back are identified as effective and promising strategies to achieve the desired behavioural and environmental change.

          Conclusions

          This study provides a comprehensive guiding framework for providers and policy-makers to improve patient handover from hospital to primary care.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-389) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.

          How people intentionally change addictive behaviors with and without treatment is not well understood by behavioral scientists. This article summarizes research on self-initiated and professionally facilitated change of addictive behaviors using the key trans-theoretical constructs of stages and processes of change. Modification of addictive behaviors involves progression through five stages--pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance--and individuals typically recycle through these stages several times before termination of the addiction. Multiple studies provide strong support for these stages as well as for a finite and common set of change processes used to progress through the stages. Research to date supports a trans-theoretical model of change that systematically integrates the stages with processes of change from diverse theories of psychotherapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial.

            Emergency department visits and rehospitalization are common after hospital discharge. To test the effects of an intervention designed to minimize hospital utilization after discharge. Randomized trial using block randomization of 6 and 8. Randomly arranged index cards were placed in opaque envelopes labeled consecutively with study numbers, and participants were assigned a study group by revealing the index card. General medical service at an urban, academic, safety-net hospital. 749 English-speaking hospitalized adults (mean age, 49.9 years). A nurse discharge advocate worked with patients during their hospital stay to arrange follow-up appointments, confirm medication reconciliation, and conduct patient education with an individualized instruction booklet that was sent to their primary care provider. A clinical pharmacist called patients 2 to 4 days after discharge to reinforce the discharge plan and review medications. Participants and providers were not blinded to treatment assignment. Primary outcomes were emergency department visits and hospitalizations within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes were self-reported preparedness for discharge and frequency of primary care providers' follow-up within 30 days of discharge. Research staff doing follow-up were blinded to study group assignment. Participants in the intervention group (n = 370) had a lower rate of hospital utilization than those receiving usual care (n = 368) (0.314 vs. 0.451 visit per person per month; incidence rate ratio, 0.695 [95% CI, 0.515 to 0.937]; P = 0.009). The intervention was most effective among participants with hospital utilization in the 6 months before index admission (P = 0.014). Adverse events were not assessed; these data were collected but are still being analyzed. This was a single-center study in which not all potentially eligible patients could be enrolled, and outcome assessment sometimes relied on participant report. A package of discharge services reduced hospital utilization within 30 days of discharge. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Role of pharmacist counseling in preventing adverse drug events after hospitalization.

              Hospitalization and subsequent discharge home often involve discontinuity of care, multiple changes in medication regimens, and inadequate patient education, which can lead to adverse drug events (ADEs) and avoidable health care utilization. Our objectives were to identify drug-related problems during and after hospitalization and to determine the effect of patient counseling and follow-up by pharmacists on preventable ADEs. We conducted a randomized trial of 178 patients being discharged home from the general medicine service at a large teaching hospital. Patients in the intervention group received pharmacist counseling at discharge and a follow-up telephone call 3 to 5 days later. Interventions focused on clarifying medication regimens; reviewing indications, directions, and potential side effects of medications; screening for barriers to adherence and early side effects; and providing patient counseling and/or physician feedback when appropriate. The primary outcome was rate of preventable ADEs. Pharmacists observed the following drug-related problems in the intervention group: unexplained discrepancies between patients' preadmission medication regimens and discharge medication orders in 49% of patients, unexplained discrepancies between discharge medication lists and postdischarge regimens in 29% of patients, and medication nonadherence in 23%. Comparing trial outcomes 30 days after discharge, preventable ADEs were detected in 11% of patients in the control group and 1% of patients in the intervention group (P = .01). No differences were found between groups in total ADEs or total health care utilization. Pharmacist medication review, patient counseling, and telephone follow-up were associated with a lower rate of preventable ADEs 30 days after hospital discharge. Medication discrepancies before and after discharge were common targets of intervention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gijs.hesselink@radboudumc.nl
                marieke.zegers@radboudumc.nl
                myrra.vernooij-dassen@radboudumc.nl
                pbarach@gmail.com
                c.j.kalkman@umcutrecht.nl
                maria.flink@karolinska.se
                gunnar.ohlen@karolinska.se
                mariann.olsson@karolinska.se
                susanne.bergenbrant-glas@karolinska.se
                corrego@fadq.org
                rsunol@fadq.org
                toccaf@gmail.com
                francesco.venneri@asf.toscana.it
                dudzik@cmj.org.pl
                kutryba@cmj.org.pl
                lisette.schoonhoven@radboudumc.nl
                hub.wollersheim@radboudumc.nl
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                13 September 2014
                13 September 2014
                2014
                : 14
                : 1
                : 389
                Affiliations
                [ ]Radboud University Medical Center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), 114 IQ healthcare, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Radboud University Medical Center, Kalorama Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Primary Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Patient Safety Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
                [ ]University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
                [ ]Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Social Work, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]Quality and Patient Safety, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]Avedis Donabedian Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [ ]Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety Centre, Tuscany region, Italy
                [ ]National Center for Quality Assessment in Health Care, Krakow, Poland
                Article
                3488
                10.1186/1472-6963-14-389
                4175223
                25218406
                834704eb-1bc8-4ae9-8c83-601b87859893
                © Hesselink et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 19 March 2014
                : 10 September 2014
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Health & Social care
                patient handoff,patient discharge,patient readmission,intervention mapping,adverse events

                Comments

                Comment on this article