19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Convergent validation of the Kohlman Evaluation of Living Skills as a screening tool of older adults' ability to live safely and independently in the community.

      Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
      Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Geriatric Assessment, methods, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Risk Assessment, Self Care, Texas

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To evaluate the convergent validity of the Kohlman Evaluation of Living Skills (KELS) to screen older adults' ability to live safely and independently. Cross-sectional study correlating KELS with components of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Participants' homes. Community-dwelling older adults (N=200) 65 years and older including 100 persons referred by Adult Protective Services (APS) and 100 ambulatory patients matched on age, race, sex, and socioeconomic status. In-home comprehensive assessment. KELS, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), modified Physical Performance Test (mPPT), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Knee Extensor Break Test, Executive Cognitive Test (EXIT25), executive clock-drawing test (CLOX) 1 and 2, and an 8-foot walk test. Older adults with abnormal KELS scores performed significantly worse on all tests except for the Knee Extensor Break Test. Accordingly, among the entire group, the KELS correlated with measures of executive function (EXIT25, r=.705, P<.001; CLOX 1, r=-.629, P<.001), cognitive function (MMSE, r=-.508, P<.001), affect (GDS, r=.318, P<.001), and physical function (mPPT, r=-.472, P<.001) but did not correlate with the Knee Extensor Break Test (r=-.068, P=.456). Among those referred by APS, the KELS failed to correlate with only the 8-foot walk test (r=.175, P=.153) and GDS (r=.080, P=.450). This study demonstrated the convergent validity of KELS with a battery of cognitive, affective, executive, and functional measures often used to determine older adults' ability to live safely and independently in the community. KELS may be a valid and pragmatic alternative to screen for the capacity to live safely and independently among older adults.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          19887222
          2855551
          10.1016/j.apmr.2009.05.021

          Chemistry
          Activities of Daily Living,Aged,Cross-Sectional Studies,Female,Geriatric Assessment,methods,Humans,Male,Mass Screening,Risk Assessment,Self Care,Texas

          Comments

          Comment on this article