17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Right ventricular kinetic energy: 4D flow MRI analysis of healthy volunteers and repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

      abstract
      1 , , 2 , 1
      Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
      BioMed Central
      17th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
      16-19 January 2014

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) is currently monitored with Cardiovascular MR (CMR) to measure right ventricle (RV) volumes and function. However, these indices do not always reflect performance status or predict success following repair of pulmonary insufficiency. RV kinetic energy (KERV) may provide a more robust measure of RV efficiency than RV end diastolic volume (EDV) index and function. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of calculating KERV with 4D Flow MRI and assess differences between rTOF and healthy volunteers. Methods Ten subjects with rTOF and 9 healthy volunteers were scanned according to an IRB approved protocol. 4D flow MRI (Phase Contrast Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Reconstruction PCVIPR) was performed on clinical MRI scanners (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) after administration of gadolinium based contrast agents. PC VIPR parameters: FOV = 260-320 mm3, isotropic 1.3 mm spatial resolution, TR/TE = 8.8-10.9/2.8-3.7 ms (1.5T), and 6.2-3.7/2.0-2.2 ms (3.0T), Venc = 40-400 cm/s, scan time: 9-17 minutes using respiratory and retrospective ECG gating. Post processing was done using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) and MatLab (The MathWorks, Natick, MA) to measure KERV and main pulmonary artery flow (QMPA) throughout the cardiac cycle. The KE of a voxel of blood was calculated from 1/2 mv^2, where the mass (m) represents the voxel volume multiplied by the density of blood (1.025 g/ml) and the velocity (v) of each voxel was determined from 4D flow MRI. KERV was determined from the sum of the KE of the voxels within the segmented RV volume at each phase of the cardiac cycle. Differences in peak systolic and diastolic KERV and the QMPA/KERV ratio, an indicator of RV-MPA coupling, between groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results Three distinct KE peaks were observed in all subjects. Peak systolic (p = 0.0076) and diastolic (p = 0.0003 peak 1, p = 0.013 peak 2) were higher in rTOF than in healthy volunteers (Figures 1,2). The QMPA/KERV ratio was lower in rTOF (0.92 +/- 0.68 ml/cycle*mJ) than in healthy volunteers (6.92 +/- 4.16, p = 0.0002). Figure 1 RV KE comparison between rTOF (O) and healthy volunteers (X). Differences in peak systolic (p = 0.0076) and diastolic (p = 0.0003 peak 1, p = 0.013 peak 2) RV KE are statistically significant. Figure 2 RV KE throughout cardiac cycle for a representative subject from rTOF and healthy volunteer groups. Three distinct KE peaks were observed in all subjects. Conclusions Time-resolved KERV was measured in rTOF and healthy volunteers using 4D flow MRI. KERV was higher and QMPA/KERV ratio was lower in rTOF than in healthy volunteers, indicative of greater inefficiency in RV function to generate the same cardiac output. Future studies are needed to determine if changes in RV KE provide earlier evidence of RV dysfunction and need for reintervention than standard CMR measurements. Funding NIH grant R01HL07226. GE Healthcare for research support.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Conference
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
          Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
          BioMed Central
          1097-6647
          1532-429X
          2014
          16 January 2014
          : 16
          : Suppl 1
          : O46
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
          [2 ]Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
          Article
          1532-429X-16-S1-O46
          10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-O46
          4045693
          8352c798-5c69-4a55-935d-0bb2382aed66
          Copyright © 2014 Jeong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

          17th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions
          New Orleans, LA, USA
          16-19 January 2014
          History
          Categories
          Oral Presentation

          Cardiovascular Medicine
          Cardiovascular Medicine

          Comments

          Comment on this article