16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Community Choir Intervention to Promote Well-Being Among Diverse Older Adults: Results From the Community of Voices Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To test effects of the Community of Voices choir intervention on the health, well-being, and health care costs of racial/ethnically diverse older adults.

          Method

          Twelve Administration-on-Aging-supported senior centers were cluster randomized into two groups: the intervention group started the choir immediately and a wait-list control group began the choir 6 months later. The choir program was designed for community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older. The multimodal intervention comprises activities that engage participants cognitively, physically, and socially. Outcome measures assessed these three domains as well as health care utilization and costs. The intention-to-treat comparison was at 6 months.

          Results

          The sample (N = 390) had a mean age of 71.3 years (SD = 7.2); 65% were nonwhite. Six-month retention was 92%. Compared to controls, intervention group members experienced significantly greater improvements in loneliness (p = .02; standardized effect size [ES = 0.34] and interest in life (p = .008, ES = 0.39). No significant group differences were observed for cognitive or physical outcomes or for health care costs.

          Discussion

          Findings support adoption of community choirs for reducing loneliness and increasing interest in life among diverse older adults. Further efforts need to examine the mechanisms by which engagement in choirs improves aspects of well-being and reduces health disparities among older adults, including potential longer-term effects.

          ClinicalTrials.gov Registration

          NCT01869179 registered January 9, 2013.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: a 6-year longitudinal study.

          V. Menec (2003)
          Activity has long been thought to be related to successful aging. This study was designed to examine longitudinally the relation between everyday activities and indicators of successful aging, namely well-being, function, and mortality. The study was based on the Aging in Manitoba Study, with activity being measured in 1990 and function, well-being, and mortality assessed in 1996. Well-being was measured in terms of life satisfaction and happiness; function was defined in terms of a composite measure combining physical and cognitive function. Regression analyses indicated that greater overall activity level was related to greater happiness, better function, and reduced mortality. Different activities were related to different outcome measures; but generally, social and productive activities were positively related to happiness, function, and mortality, whereas more solitary activities (e.g., hand-work hobbies) were related only to happiness. These findings highlight the importance of activity in successful aging. The results also suggest that different types of activities may have different benefits. Whereas social and productive activities may afford physical benefits, as reflected in better function and greater longevity, more solitary activities, such as reading, may have more psychological benefits by providing a sense of engagement with life.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Mental, Physical and Social Components in Leisure Activities Equally Contribute to Decrease Dementia Risk

            Background: There is accumulating evidence in the literature that leisure engagement has a beneficial effect on dementia. Most studies have grouped activities according to whether they were predominantly mental, physical or social. Since many activities contain more than one component, we aimed to verify the effect of all three major components on the dementia risk, as well as their combined effect. Methods: A mental, social and physical component score was estimated for each activity by the researchers and a sample of elderly persons. The correlation between the ratings of the authors and the means of the elderly subjects’ ratings was 0.86. The study population consisted of 776 nondemented subjects, aged 75 years and above, living in Stockholm, Sweden, who were still nondemented after 3 years and were followed for 3 more years to detect incident dementia cases. Results: Multi-adjusted relative risks (RRs) of dementia for subjects with higher mental, physical and social component score sums were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.49–1.03), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.42–0.87) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.47–0.99), respectively. The most beneficial effect was present for subjects with high scores in all or in two of the components (RR of dementia = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.36–0.78). Conclusions: These findings suggest that a broad spectrum of activities containing more than one of the components seems to be more beneficial than to be engaged in only one type of activity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Effect Sizes in Cluster-Randomized Designs

              L. Hedges (2007)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1079-5014
                1758-5368
                March 2020
                February 14 2020
                November 09 2018
                March 2020
                February 14 2020
                November 09 2018
                : 75
                : 3
                : 549-559
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, Bethesda, Maryland
                [2 ]Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, University of California San Francisco, Bethesda, Maryland
                [3 ]Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, Bethesda, Maryland
                [4 ]Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
                [5 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
                Article
                10.1093/geronb/gby132
                7328053
                30412233
                838d2e08-0b54-4abc-9d00-097700af9a3d
                © 2018

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article