7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictors of Current and Longer-Term Patterns of Abundance of American Pikas ( Ochotona princeps) across a Leading-Edge Protected Area

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          American pikas ( Ochotona princeps) have been heralded as indicators of montane-mammal response to contemporary climate change. Pikas no longer occupy the driest and lowest-elevation sites in numerous parts of their geographic range. Conversely, pikas have exhibited higher rates of occupancy and persistence in Rocky Mountain and Sierra Nevada montane ‘mainlands’. Research and monitoring efforts on pikas across the western USA have collectively shown the nuance and complexity with which climate will often act on species in diverse topographic and climatic contexts. However, to date no studies have investigated habitat, distribution, and abundance of pikas across hundreds of sites within a remote wilderness area. Additionally, relatively little is known about whether climate acts most strongly on pikas through direct or indirect (e.g., vegetation-mediated) mechanisms. During 2007–2009, we collectively hiked >16,000 km throughout the 410,077-ha Glacier National Park, Montana, USA, in an effort to identify topographic, microrefugial, and vegetative characteristics predictive of pika abundance. We identified 411 apparently pika-suitable habitat patches with binoculars ( in situ), and surveyed 314 of them for pika signs. Ranking of alternative logistic-regression models based on AIC c scores revealed that short-term pika abundances were positively associated with intermediate elevations, greater cover of mosses, and taller forbs, and decreased each year, for a total decline of 68% during the three-year study; whereas longer-term abundances were associated only with static variables (longitude, elevation, gradient) and were lower on north-facing slopes. Earlier Julian date and time of day of the survey (i.e., midday vs. not) were associated with lower observed pika abundance. We recommend that wildlife monitoring account for this seasonal and diel variation when surveying pikas. Broad-scale information on status and abundance determinants of montane mammals, especially for remote protected areas, is crucial for land and wildlife-resource managers trying to anticipate mammalian responses to climate change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change.

          The first expected symptoms of a climate change-generated biodiversity crisis are range contractions and extinctions at lower elevational and latitudinal limits to species distributions. However, whilst range expansions at high elevations and latitudes have been widely documented, there has been surprisingly little evidence for contractions at warm margins. We show that lower elevational limits for 16 butterfly species in central Spain have risen on average by 212 m (± SE 60) in 30 years, accompanying a 1.3 °C rise (equivalent to c. 225 m) in mean annual temperature. These elevational shifts signify an average reduction in habitable area by one-third, with losses of 50-80% projected for the coming century, given maintenance of the species thermal associations. The results suggest that many species have already suffered climate-mediated habitat losses that may threaten their long-term chances of survival.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Range retractions and extinction in the face of climate warming.

            Until recently, published evidence for the responses of species to climate change had revealed more examples of species expanding than retracting their distributions. However, recent papers on butterflies and frogs now show that population-level and species-level extinctions are occurring. The relative lack of previous information about range retractions and extinctions appears to stem, at least partly, from a failure to survey the distributions of species at sufficiently fine resolution to detect declines, and from a failure to attribute such declines to climate change. The new evidence suggests that climate-driven extinctions and range retractions are already widespread.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The idiosyncrasies of place: geographic variation in the climate-distribution relationships of the American pika.

              Although climate acts as a fundamental constraint on the distribution of organisms, understanding how this relationship between climate and distribution varies over a species' range is critical for addressing the potential impacts of accelerated climate change on biodiversity. Bioclimatic niche models provide compelling evidence that many species will experience range shifts under scenarios of global change, yet these broad, macroecological perspectives lack specificity at local scales, where unique combinations of environment, biota, and history conspire against generalizations. We explored how these idiosyncrasies of place affect the climate-distribution relationship of the American pika (Ochotona princeps) by replicating intensive field surveys across bioclimatic gradients in eight U.S. national parks. At macroecological scales, the importance of climate as a constraint on pika distribution appears unequivocal; forecasts suggest that the species' range will contract sharply in coming decades. However, the species persists outside of its modeled bioclimatic envelope in many locations, fueling uncertainty and debate over its conservation status. Using a Bayesian hierarchical approach, we modeled variation in local patterns of pika distribution along topographic position, vegetation cover, elevation, temperature, and precipitation gradients in each park landscape. We also accounted for annual turnover in site occupancy probabilities. Topographic position and vegetation cover influenced occurrence in all parks. After accounting for these factors, pika occurrence varied widely among parks along bioclimatic gradients. Precipitation by itself was not a particularly influential predictor. However, measures of heat stress appeared most influential in the driest parks, suggesting an interaction between the strength of climate effects and the position of parks along precipitation gradients. The combination of high elevation, cold temperatures, and high precipitation lowered occurrence probabilities in some parks, suggesting an upper elevational limit for pikas in some environments. Our results demonstrate that the idiosyncrasies of place influence both the nature and strength of the climate-distribution relationship for the American pika. Fine-grained, but geographically extensive, studies replicated across multiple landscapes offer insights important to assessing the impacts of climate change that otherwise may be masked at macroecological scales. The hierarchical approach to modeling provides a coherent conceptual and technical framework for gaining these insights.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                30 November 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 11
                : e0167051
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
                [2 ]U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America
                [4 ]U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
                [5 ]Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Department, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
                [6 ]Glacier National Park, National Park Service, West Glacier, Montana, United States of America
                [7 ]Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park, National Park Service, Skagway, Alaska, United States of America
                Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, ITALY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: LMH EAB.

                • Data curation: LMH EAB DHJ.

                • Formal analysis: LMH EAB DHJ.

                • Funding acquisition: LMH.

                • Investigation: LMH EAB.

                • Methodology: LMH EAB DHJ.

                • Project administration: LMH.

                • Resources: LMH EAB DHJ.

                • Software: LMH.

                • Supervision: LMH.

                • Validation: LMH EAB DHJ MB JB.

                • Visualization: LMH.

                • Writing – original draft: LMH EAB DHJ MB JB.

                • Writing – review & editing: LMH EAB DHJ MB JB.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-20989
                10.1371/journal.pone.0167051
                5130250
                27902732
                838df7d9-0876-4f84-ac9f-b6560b6f0885

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 24 May 2016
                : 8 November 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 25
                Funding
                Funded by: Glacier National Park Conservancy
                Award Recipient :
                LMH received funding in support of this work from the Glacier National Park Conservancy ( https://www.glacierconservancy.org/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Pikas
                Earth Sciences
                Atmospheric Science
                Climatology
                Climate Change
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Nonvascular Plants
                Mosses
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Cartography
                Longitude
                Earth Sciences
                Glaciology
                Glaciers
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                North America
                United States
                Montana
                Earth Sciences
                Seasons
                Earth Sciences
                Atmospheric Science
                Climatology
                Paleoclimatology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Paleontology
                Paleoclimatology
                Earth Sciences
                Paleontology
                Paleoclimatology
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article