12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An early and late peak in microglial activation in Alzheimer’s disease trajectory

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The longitudinal course of microglial activation in the trajectory of Alzheimer’s disease is unclear. Fan et al. demonstrate two peaks: one in early MCI and another in late Alzheimer’s disease. Activated microglia in MCI may initially adopt a protective anti-inflammatory phenotype, changing to a pro-inflammatory phenotype as the disease progresses.

          Abstract

          Amyloid-β deposition, neuroinflammation and tau tangle formation all play a significant role in Alzheimer’s disease. We hypothesized that there is microglial activation early on in Alzheimer’s disease trajectory, where in the initial phase, microglia may be trying to repair the damage, while later on in the disease these microglia could be ineffective and produce proinflammatory cytokines leading to progressive neuronal damage. In this longitudinal study, we have evaluated the temporal profile of microglial activation and its relationship between fibrillar amyloid load at baseline and follow-up in subjects with mild cognitive impairment, and this was compared with subjects with Alzheimer’s disease. Thirty subjects (eight mild cognitive impairment, eight Alzheimer’s disease and 14 controls) aged between 54 and 77 years underwent 11C-(R)PK11195, 11C-PIB positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans. Patients were followed-up after 14 ± 4 months. Region of interest and Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis were used to determine longitudinal alterations. Single subject analysis was performed to evaluate the individualized pathological changes over time. Correlations between levels of microglial activation and amyloid deposition at a voxel level were assessed using Biological Parametric Mapping. We demonstrated that both baseline and follow-up microglial activation in the mild cognitive impairment cohort compared to controls were increased by 41% and 21%, respectively. There was a longitudinal reduction of 18% in microglial activation in mild cognitive impairment cohort over 14 months, which was associated with a mild elevation in fibrillar amyloid load. Cortical clusters of microglial activation and amyloid deposition spatially overlapped in the subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Baseline microglial activation was increased by 36% in Alzheimer’s disease subjects compared with controls. Longitudinally, Alzheimer’s disease subjects showed an increase in microglial activation. In conclusion, this is one of the first longitudinal positron emission tomography studies evaluating longitudinal changes in microglial activation in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease subjects. We found there is an initial longitudinal reduction in microglial activation in subjects with mild cognitive impairment, while subjects with Alzheimer’s disease showed an increase in microglial activation. This could reflect that activated microglia in mild cognitive impairment initially may adopt a protective activation phenotype, which later change to a cidal pro-inflammatory phenotype as disease progresses and amyloid clearance fails. Thus, we speculate that there might be two peaks of microglial activation in the Alzheimer’s disease trajectory; an early protective peak and a later pro-inflammatory peak. If so, anti-microglial agents targeting the pro-inflammatory phenotype would be most beneficial in the later stages of the disease.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Brain
          Brain
          brainj
          Brain
          Oxford University Press
          0006-8950
          1460-2156
          March 2017
          24 January 2017
          01 March 2018
          : 140
          : 3
          : 792-803
          Affiliations
          [1 ]1 Neurology Imaging Unit, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
          [2 ]2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Dr Paul Edison MBBS, MRCP, MPhil, PhD, FRCPI Neurology Imaging Unit, Imperial College London, B Block, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK E-mail: paul.edison@ 123456imperial.ac.uk
          Article
          PMC5837520 PMC5837520 5837520 aww349
          10.1093/brain/aww349
          5837520
          28122877
          83a7899e-f91d-4fa6-a734-63c8a96d2c0d
          © The Author (2017). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
          History
          : 20 June 2016
          : 31 October 2016
          : 18 November 2016
          Page count
          Pages: 12
          Funding
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
          Funded by: Medical Research Council and now by Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)
          Funded by: Medical Research Council and Alzheimer’s Research UK
          Funded by: Medical Research Council and Alzheimer’s Research, UK
          Funded by: NIHR CRF and BRC at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
          Funded by: Alzheimer’s Research, UK, Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation, Alzheimer’s Society, UK, Novo Nordisk and GE Healthcare
          Categories
          Original Articles

          neuropathology,Alzheimer’s disease,mild cognitive impairment,microglial activation,amyloid imaging

          Comments

          Comment on this article