41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Rectilinear Crossing Number of K_10 is 62

      Preprint
      , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A drawing of a graph G in the plane is said to be a rectilinear drawing of G if the edges are required to be line segments (as opposed to Jordan curves). We assume no three vertices are collinear. The rectilinear crossing number of G is the fewest number of edge crossings attainable over all rectilinear drawings of G. Thanks to Richard Guy, exact values of the rectilinear crossing number of K_n, the complete graph on n vertices, for n = 3,...,9, are known (Guy 1972,

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The crossing number of K5,n

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A note on the parity of the number of crossings of a graph

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An upper bound for the rectilinear crossing number of the complete graph

              H.F Jensen (1971)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                22 September 2000
                Article
                cs/0009023
                83ac9cc3-dd4d-4292-a317-8b3b38e26621
                History
                Custom metadata
                Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 8(1):R23 1-30. 2001
                17 Pages, colour figures
                cs.DM math.CO

                Comments

                Comment on this article