113
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The attack of the psychometricians

      research-article
      Psychometrika
      Springer Netherlands
      Psychometrics, modern test theory, classical test theory, construct validity, psychological measurement

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper analyzes the theoretical, pragmatic, and substantive factors that have hampered the integration between psychology and psychometrics. Theoretical factors include the operationalist mode of thinking which is common throughout psychology, the dominance of classical test theory, and the use of “construct validity” as a catch-all category for a range of challenging psychometric problems. Pragmatic factors include the lack of interest in mathematically precise thinking in psychology, inadequate representation of psychometric modeling in major statistics programs, and insufficient mathematical training in the psychological curriculum. Substantive factors relate to the absence of psychological theories that are sufficiently strong to motivate the structure of psychometric models. Following the identification of these problems, a number of promising recent developments are discussed, and suggestions are made to further the integration of psychology and psychometrics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.

          An implicit association test (IAT) measures differential association of 2 target concepts with an attribute. The 2 concepts appear in a 2-choice task (2-choice task (e.g., flower vs. insect names), and the attribute in a 2nd task (e.g., pleasant vs. unpleasant words for an evaluation attribute). When instructions oblige highly associated categories (e.g., flower + pleasant) to share a response key, performance is faster than when less associated categories (e.g., insect & pleasant) share a key. This performance difference implicitly measures differential association of the 2 concepts with the attribute. In 3 experiments, the IAT was sensitive to (a) near-universal evaluative differences (e.g., flower vs. insect), (b) expected individual differences in evaluative associations (Japanese + pleasant vs. Korean + pleasant for Japanese vs. Korean subjects), and (c) consciously disavowed evaluative differences (Black + pleasant vs. White + pleasant for self-described unprejudiced White subjects).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Construct validity in psychological tests.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                d.borsboom@uva.nl
                Journal
                Psychometrika
                Psychometrika
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0033-3123
                1860-0980
                23 September 2006
                September 2006
                : 71
                : 3
                : 425-440
                Affiliations
                University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
                Article
                1447
                10.1007/s11336-006-1447-6
                2779444
                19946599
                83b412e4-3c81-4748-9927-3b9211621b93
                © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006
                History
                : 6 January 2006
                : 20 April 2006
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                psychometrics,psychological measurement,modern test theory,classical test theory,construct validity

                Comments

                Comment on this article