13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Comparative analysis of fruit-based functional snack bars

      , , , ,
      Food Chemistry
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence.

          Approximately 200 studies that examined the relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and cancers of the lung, colon, breast, cervix, esophagus, oral cavity, stomach, bladder, pancreas, and ovary are reviewed. A statistically significant protective effect of fruit and vegetable consumption was found in 128 of 156 dietary studies in which results were expressed in terms of relative risk. For most cancer sites, persons with low fruit and vegetable intake (at least the lower one-fourth of the population) experience about twice the risk of cancer compared with those with high intake, even after control for potentially confounding factors. For lung cancer, significant protection was found in 24 of 25 studies after control for smoking in most instances. Fruits, in particular, were significantly protective in cancers of the esophagus, oral cavity, and larynx, for which 28 of 29 studies were significant. Strong evidence of a protective effect of fruit and vegetable consumption was seen in cancers of the pancreas and stomach (26 of 30 studies), as well as in colorectal and bladder cancers (23 of 38 studies). For cancers of the cervix, ovary, and endometrium, a significant protective effect was shown in 11 of 13 studies, and for breast cancer a protective effect was found to be strong and consistent in a meta analysis. It would appear that major public health benefits could be achieved by substantially increasing consumption of these foods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease.

            Many constituents of fruits and vegetables may reduce the risk for coronary heart disease, but data on the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and risk for coronary heart disease are sparse. To evaluate the association of fruit and vegetable consumption with risk for coronary heart disease. Prospective cohort study. The Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study. 84 251 women 34 to 59 years of age who were followed for 14 years and 42 148 men 40 to 75 years who were followed for 8 years. All were free of diagnosed cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes at baseline. The main outcome measure was incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal coronary heart disease (1127 cases in women and 1063 cases in men). Diet was assessed by using food-frequency questionnaires. After adjustment for standard cardiovascular risk factors, persons in the highest quintile of fruit and vegetable intake had a relative risk for coronary heart disease of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93) compared with those in the lowest quintile of intake. Each 1-serving/d increase in intake of fruits or vegetables was associated with a 4% lower risk for coronary heart disease (relative risk, 0.96 [CI, 0.94 to 0.99]; P = 0.01, test for trend). Green leafy vegetables (relative risk with 1-serving/d increase, 0.77 [CI, 0.64 to 0.93]), and vitamin C-rich fruits and vegetables (relative risk with 1-serving/d increase, 0.94 [CI, 0.88 to 0.99]) contributed most to the apparent protective effect of total fruit and vegetable intake. Consumption of fruits and vegetables, particularly green leafy vegetables and vitamin C-rich fruits and vegetables, appears to have a protective effect against coronary heart disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measurement of uronic acids without interference from neutral sugars.

              Replacement of carbazole with meta-hydroxydiphenyl greatly improves the determination of uronic acids in the presence of neutral sugars by preventing substantially, but not completely, the browning that occurs during the heating of sugars in concentrated sulfuric acid and avoiding the formation of additional interference by the carbazole reagent (Blumenkrantz, N., and Asboe-Hansen, G. (1973) Anal. Biochem. 54, 484-489). However, interference is still substantial when uronic acids are determined in the presence of excess neutral sugar, particularly because of the browning that occurs during the first heating before addition of the diphenyl reagent. The browning can be essentially eliminated by addition of sulfamate to the reaction mixture (Galambos, J. T. (1967) Anal. Biochem. 19, 119-132). Although others have reported that sulfamate and the diphenyl reagent were incompatible, we find that a small amount of sulfamate suppresses color production by a 20-fold excess of some neutral sugars without substantial sacrifice of the sensitive detection of uronic acids by the diphenyl reagent. Sodium tetraborate is required for the detection of D-mannuronic acid and enhances color production by D-glucuronic acid. We propose this modified sulfamate/m-hydroxydiphenyl assay as a rapid and reliable means for the assay of uronic acids, particularly when present in much smaller amounts than neutral sugars.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Food Chemistry
                Food Chemistry
                Elsevier BV
                03088146
                April 2010
                April 2010
                : 119
                : 4
                : 1369-1379
                Article
                10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.016
                83dbc74f-b73a-4894-b5c1-72424131558b
                © 2010

                http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article