2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli

      1 , 2 , 3 , 2
      Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recently, Sui and colleagues introduced an experimental task to investigate prioritization of arbitrary stimuli associated with the self. They demonstrated that after being told to associate three identities (self, friend, stranger) with three arbitrary stimuli (geometrical shapes), participants were faster in a perceptual matching task to recognise matching pairs of self-associated shape with self-label, than respective friend or stranger-related pairings. They interpreted this as evidence that a brief self-association is sufficient to facilitate processing of previously neutral stimuli. However, in the matching trials of the self-prioritization task, participants are processing not only self-associated arbitrary stimuli but also familiar verbal labels with an established meaning. Therefore, the self-advantage may be caused by familiarity of the labels, rather than self-association of the shapes. To test whether self-prioritization can be elicited in a task employing exclusively neutral stimuli, we asked participants to associate avatar faces with three identities (self, name of best friend, and stranger) and replaced labels with unfamiliar abstract symbols that were associated to the words (you, friend, stranger) before the actual experiment started. The results presented the usual pattern of self-prioritization showing that this effect does not critically depend on the presence of familiar labels and that it can be elicited in the absence of any familiar stimuli.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The distributed human neural system for face perception

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
                Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
                SAGE Publications
                1747-0218
                1747-0226
                February 15 2019
                August 2019
                March 05 2019
                August 2019
                : 72
                : 8
                : 2110-2120
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cognition and Philosophy Lab, Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
                [2 ]Social Mind Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary
                [3 ]Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
                Article
                10.1177/1747021819832981
                84284304-7428-4d46-8942-7b8d55c5a998
                © 2019

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article