Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Captopril and Doxazosin during Slight Physical Activity in Hypertensive Patients with Type-1 Diabetes mellitus

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are renoprotective in diabetes mellitus through their intrarenal hemodynamic effects. Alpha-1 blockade has variable pre- and postglomerular vasodilatory effects dependent upon the stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. We tested the hypothesis that the two different classes of drugs have similar renal hemodynamic effects when the patients are examined in an upright position where the sympathetic nervous system is activated. Mean blood pressure (MAP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were examined in 28 hypertensive type-1 diabetic patients with variable degree of nephropathy treated for a mean period of 7.6 ± 0.4 months with captopril (n = 13) or doxazosin (n = 15). Average treatment doses were 112 ± 7 mg/day in the captopril group and 8 ± 1 mg/day in the doxazosin group. Sitting MAP decreased from 118 ± 3 to 106 ± 4 mm Hg after captopril (p < 0.05), and from 117 ± 4 to 110 ± 3 mm Hg after doxazosin (p = 0.07). GFR and ERPF were unchanged in both groups. The filtration fraction (FF) decreased from 0.27 ± 0.02 to 0.25 ± 0.02 after captopril (p < 0.05) and from 0.26 ± 0.01 to 0.25 ± 0.01 after doxazosin (p = 0.08). Calculation of 95% confidence intervals of the difference between the post-treatment values as well as the difference between pre- and post-treatment values of MAP, GFR, ERPF and FF of the two drugs indicates no difference in renal hemodynamic response between the drugs. In conclusion, captopril and doxazosin have similar renal hemodynamic responses when the patients are examined in a situation where the sympathetic nervous system is stimulated, and this suggests that doxazosin has a renoprotective effect beyond the blood pressure-lowering effect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Major Cardiovascular Events in Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Doxazosin vs Chlorthalidone: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of captopril on progression to clinical proteinuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria. European Microalbuminuria Captopril Study Group.

            To study the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on the rate of progression to clinical proteinuria and the rate of change of albumin excretion rates in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and persistent microalbuminuria. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 2 years' duration at 12 hospital-based diabetes centers. Ninety-two patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and persistent microalbuminuria but no hypertension. The patients were randomly allocated in blocks of two to receive either captopril, 50 mg, or placebo twice per day. Albumin excretion rate, blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and fructosamine level every 3 months; urinary urea nitrogen excretion every 6 months; and glomerular filtration rate every 12 months. Twelve patients receiving placebo and four receiving captopril progressed to clinical proteinuria, defined as an albumin excretion rate persistently greater than 200 micrograms/min and at least a 30% increase from baseline (P = .05). The probability of progression to clinical proteinuria was significantly reduced by captopril therapy (P = .03 by log-rank test). Albumin excretion rate rose from a geometric mean (95% confidence interval) of 52 (39 to 68) to 76 (47 to 122) micrograms/min in the placebo group but fell from 52 (41 to 65) to 41 (28 to 60) micrograms/min in the captopril group, a significant difference (P < .01). Mean blood pressure was similar at baseline in the two groups and remained unchanged in the placebo group but fell significantly, by 3 to 7 mm Hg, in the captopril group. Glycosylated hemoglobin levels and glomerular filtration rate remained stable in the two groups. Captopril therapy significantly impeded progression to clinical proteinuria and prevented the increase in albumin excretion rate in nonhypertensive patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and persistent microalbuminuria.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              KBR
              Kidney Blood Press Res
              10.1159/issn.1420-4096
              Kidney and Blood Pressure Research
              S. Karger AG
              1420-4096
              1423-0143
              2001
              2001
              24 January 2001
              : 24
              : 1
              : 64-70
              Affiliations
              aRenal Research Group and bDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
              Article
              54208 Kidney Blood Press Res 2001;24:64–70
              10.1159/000054208
              11174009
              © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

              Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

              Page count
              Figures: 4, Tables: 3, References: 27, Pages: 7
              Product
              Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/54208
              Categories
              Original Paper

              Comments

              Comment on this article