7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Preaching to, or Beyond, the Choir : The Politicizing Effects of Fitting Value-Identity Communication in Ideologically Heterogeneous Groups

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Although values motivate participation in collective action, little is known about whether their communication by a social movement motivates identification with it. In the context of student protests against budget cuts, we tested whether and how fitting a value (right to free education) to two relevant group identities (i.e., student vs. national identity) influenced politicized identification among individuals in ideologically different student subgroups ( N = 168). Specifically, for students who shared the movement’s ideological background, we found that communicating values increased the predictive power of affective predictors of politicized identification over instrumental ones. However, for students who did not share the movement’s ideological background, fitting values to student (but not national) identity decreased politicized identification. These findings imply that value-identity fit must be taken into account if one wants to motivate a broad audience of potential followers with diverse ideological backgrounds for collective action.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.

          An integrative social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) is developed that incorporates 3 socio-psychological perspectives on collective action. Three meta-analyses synthesized a total of 182 effects of perceived injustice, efficacy, and identity on collective action (corresponding to these socio-psychological perspectives). Results showed that, in isolation, all 3 predictors had medium-sized (and causal) effects. Moreover, results showed the importance of social identity in predicting collective action by supporting SIMCA's key predictions that (a) affective injustice and politicized identity produced stronger effects than those of non-affective injustice and non-politicized identity; (b) identity predicted collective action against both incidental and structural disadvantages, whereas injustice and efficacy predicted collective action against incidental disadvantages better than against structural disadvantages; (c) all 3 predictors had unique medium-sized effects on collective action when controlling for between-predictor covariance; and (d) identity bridged the injustice and efficacy explanations of collective action. Results also showed more support for SIMCA than for alternative models reflecting previous attempts at theoretical integration. The authors discuss key implications for theory, practice, future research, and further integration of social and psychological perspectives on collective action. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.

            Five studies explored cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses to proscribed forms of social cognition. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that people responded to taboo trade-offs that monetized sacred values with moral outrage and cleansing. Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that racial egalitarians were least likely to use, and angriest at those who did use, race-tainted base rates and that egalitarians who inadvertently used such base rates tried to reaffirm their fair-mindedness. Experiment 5 revealed that Christian fundamentalists were most likely to reject heretical counterfactuals that applied everyday causal schemata to Biblical narratives and to engage in moral cleansing after merely contemplating such possibilities. Although the results fit the sacred-value-protection model (SVPM) better than rival formulations, the SVPM must draw on cross-cultural taxonomies of relational schemata to specify normative boundaries on thought.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                zsp
                Social Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1864-9335
                2151-2590
                December 30, 2015
                2016
                : 47
                : 1
                : 15-28
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Maja Kutlaca, Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands, Tel. +31 50 363-6248, E-mail m.kutlaca@ 123456rug.nl
                Article
                zsp_47_1_15
                10.1027/1864-9335/a000254
                8475568b-8d75-4355-af7c-12fd5cb6686d
                Copyright @ 2015
                History
                : November 20, 2014
                : May 12, 2015
                : June 30, 2015
                Categories
                Original Article

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology,General social science,General behavioral science
                social identity,values,communication,politicized identity,collective action

                Comments

                Comment on this article