21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Simple Assessment of Nitrogen Nutrition Index in Summer Maize by Using Chlorophyll Meter Readings

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rapid and non-destructive diagnostic tools to accurately assess crop nitrogen nutrition index (NNI) are imperative for improving crop nitrogen (N) diagnosis and sustaining crop production. This study was aimed to develop the relationships among NNI, leaf N gradient, chlorophyll meter (CM) readings gradient, and positional differences chlorophyll meter index [PDCMI, the ratio of CM readings between different leaf layers (LLs) of crop canopy] and to validate the accuracy and stability of these relationships across the different LLs, years, sites, and cultivars. Six multi-N rates (0–320 kg ha −1) field experiments were conducted with four summer maize cultivars (Zhengdan958, Denghai605, Xundan20, and Denghai661) at two different sites located in China. Six summer maize plants per plot were harvested at each sampling stage to assess NNI, leaf N concentration and CM readings of different LLs during the vegetative growth period. The results showed that the leaf N gradient, CM readings gradient and PDCMI of different LLs decreased, while the NNI values increased with increasing N supply. The leaf N gradient and CM readings gradient increased gradually from top to bottom of the canopy and CM readings of the bottom LL were more sensitive to changes in plant N concentration. The significantly positive relationship between NNI and CM readings of different LLs ( LL1 to LL3) was observed, yet these relationships varied across the years. In contrast, the relationships between NNI and PDCMI of different LLs ( LL1 to LL3) were significantly negative. The strongest relationship between PDCMI and NNI which was stable across the cultivars and years was observed for PDCMI1−3 (NNI = −5.74 × PDCMI1−3+1.5, R 2 = 0.76 **). Additionally, the models developed in this study were validated with the data acquired from two independent experiments to assess their accuracy of prediction. The root mean square error value of 0.1 indicated that the most accurate and robust relationship was observed between PDCMI1–3 and NNI. The projected results would help to develop a simple, non-destructive and reliable approach to accurately assess the crop N status for precisely managing N application during the growth period of summer maize crop.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnosis tool for plant and crop N status in vegetative stage

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Adjustment for Specific Leaf Weight Improves Chlorophyll Meter's Estimate of Rice Leaf Nitrogen Concentration

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                19 January 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Key Laboratory of Crop Water Use and Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Xinxiang, China
                [2] 2Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Nanjing, China
                [3] 3Computer Engineering School, Weifang University , Weifang, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Stefano Cesco, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy

                Reviewed by: Peter Thorburn, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia; Paolo Sambo, Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy

                *Correspondence: Aiwang Duan duanaiwang@ 123456aliyun.com

                This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2018.00011
                5780453
                29403521
                847c3f76-1361-4a53-9405-6095fe9f607e
                Copyright © 2018 Zhao, Ata-Ul-Karim, Liu, Zhang, Xiao, Liu, Qin, Ning, Yang, Zhang and Duan.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 July 2017
                : 03 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 6, Equations: 12, References: 38, Pages: 13, Words: 8606
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                nitrogen nutrition index,summer maize,nitrogen diagnosis,chlorophyll meter,positional differences chlorophyll meter index

                Comments

                Comment on this article