14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Drug Design, Development and Therapy (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on the design and development of drugs, as well as the clinical outcomes, patient safety, and programs targeted at the effective and safe use of medicines. Sign up for email alerts here.

      88,007 Monthly downloads/views I 4.319 Impact Factor I 6.6 CiteScore I 1.12 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.784 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

       

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of probenecid and cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of nemonoxacin in healthy Chinese volunteers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To investigate the effects of probenecid and cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of nemonoxacin in humans.

          Methods

          Two independent, open-label, randomized, crossover studies were conducted in 24 (12 per study) healthy Chinese volunteers. In Study 1, each volunteer received a single oral dose of 500 mg of nemonoxacin alone or with 1.5 g of probenecid divided into three doses within 25 hours. In Study 2, each volunteer received a single oral dose of 500 mg of nemonoxacin alone or with multiple doses of cimetidine (400 mg thrice daily for 7 days). The plasma and urine nemonoxacin concentrations were determined using validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods.

          Results

          Coadministration of nemonoxacin with probenecid reduced the renal clearance (CL r) of nemonoxacin by 22.6%, and increased the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC 0−∞) by 26.2%. Coadministration of nemonoxacin with cimetidine reduced the CL r of nemonoxacin by 13.3% and increased AUC 0−∞ by 9.4%. Coadministration of nemonoxacin with probenecid or cimetidine did not significantly affect the maximum concentration of nemonoxacin or the percentage of the administered dose recovered in the urine.

          Conclusion

          Although probenecid reduced the CL r and increased the plasma exposure of nemonoxacin, these effects are unlikely to be clinically meaningful at therapeutic doses. Cimetidine had weaker, clinically meaningless effects on the pharmacokinetics of nemonoxacin.

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The clinical pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin.

          Levofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic and is the optical S-(-) isomer of the racemic drug substance ofloxacin. It has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as certain other pathogens such as Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, Legionella and Mycobacteria spp. Levofloxacin is significantly more active against bacterial pathogens than R-(+)-ofloxacin. Levofloxacin hemihydrate, the commercially formulated product, is 97.6% levofloxacin by weight. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics are described by a linear 2-compartment open model with first-order elimination. Plasma concentrations in healthy volunteers reach a mean peak drug plasma concentration (Cmax) of approximately 2.8 and 5.2 mg/L within 1 to 2 hours after oral administration of levofloxacin 250 and 500mg tablets, respectively. The bioavailability of oral levofloxacin approaches 100% and is little affected by the administration with food. Oral absorption is very rapid and complete, with little difference in the serum concentration-time profiles following 500mg oral or intravenous (infused over 60 minutes) doses. Single oral doses of levofloxacin 50 to 1000mg produce a mean Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ranging from approximately 0.6 to 9.4 mg/L and 4.7 to 108 mg.h/L, respectively, both increasing linearly in a dose-proportional fashion. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin are similar during multiple-dose regimens to those following single doses. Levofloxacin is widely distributed throughout the body, with a mean volume of distribution of 1.1 L/kg, and penetrates well into most body tissues and fluids. Drug concentrations in tissues and fluids are generally greater than those observed in plasma, but penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid is relatively poor (concentrations approximately 16% of simultaneous plasma values). Levofloxacin is approximately 24 to 38% bound to serum plasma proteins (primarily albumin); serum protein binding is independent of serum drug concentrations. The plasma elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) ranges from 6 to 8 hours in individuals with normal renal function. Approximately 80% of levofloxacin is eliminated as unchanged drug in the urine through glomerular filtration and tubular secretion; minimal metabolism occurs with the formation of no metabolites possessing relevant pharmacological activity. Renal clearance and total body clearance are highly correlated with creatinine clearance (CLCR), and dosage adjustments are required in patients with significant renal dysfunction. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics are not appreciably affected by age, gender or race when differences in renal function, and body mass and composition are taken into account. Important drug interactions exist with aluminium- and magnesium-containing antacids and ferrous sulfate, as with other fluoroquinolones, resulting in significantly decreased levofloxacin absorption when administered concurrently. These agents should be administered at least 2 hours before or after levofloxacin administration. Cimetidine and probenecid decrease levofloxacin renal clearance and increase t1/2 beta; the magnitudes of these interactions are not clinically significant. Levofloxacin appears to have only minor potential for significantly altering the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, warfarin, zidovudine, ranitidine, digoxin or cyclosporin; however, patients receiving these drugs concurrently should be monitored closely for signs of enhanced pharmacological effect or toxicity. Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics are not significantly altered by sucralfate when administration of these drugs is separated by at least 2 hours.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and safety of nemonoxacin versus levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia.

            Nemonoxacin, a novel nonfluorinated quinolone, exhibits potent in vitro and in vivo activities against community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Patients with mild to moderate CAP (n = 265) were randomized to receive oral nemonoxacin (750 mg or 500 mg) or levofloxacin (500 mg) once daily for 7 days. Clinical responses were determined at the test-of-cure visit in intent-to-treat (ITT), clinical per protocol (PPc), evaluable-ITT, and evaluable-PPc populations. The clinical cure rates for 750 mg nemonoxacin, 500 mg nemonoxacin, and levofloxacin were 89.9%, 87.0%, and 91.1%, respectively, in the evaluable-ITT population; 91.7%, 87.7%, and 90.3%, respectively, in the evaluable-PPc population; 82.6%, 75.3%, and 80.0%, respectively, in the ITT population; and 83.5%, 78.0%, and 82.3%, respectively, in the PPc population. Noninferiority to levofloxacin was demonstrated in both the 750-mg and 500-mg nemonoxacin groups for the evaluable-ITT and evaluable-PPc populations, and also in the 750 mg nemonoxacin group for the ITT and PPc populations. Overall bacteriological success rates were high for all treatment groups in the evaluable-bacteriological ITT population (90.2% in the 750 mg nemonoxacin group, 84.8% in the 500 mg nemonoxacin group, and 92.0% in the levofloxacin group). All three treatments were well tolerated, and no drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Overall, oral nemonoxacin (both 750 mg and 500 mg) administered for 7 days resulted in high clinical and bacteriological success rates in CAP patients. Further, good tolerability and excellent activity against common causative pathogens were demonstrated. Nemonoxacin (750 mg and 500 mg) once daily is as effective and safe as levofloxacin (500 mg) once daily for the treatment of CAP.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              In vitro activity of nemonoxacin, a novel nonfluorinated quinolone, against 2,440 clinical isolates.

              The in vitro activity of nemonoxacin (TG-873870), a novel nonfluorinated quinolone, was tested against 2,440 clinical isolates. Nemonoxacin was at least fourfold more active than levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against most gram-positive cocci tested (shown by the following MIC(90)/range [microg/ml] values; community-associated methicillin [meticillin]-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 0.5/0.015 to 2; Staphylococcus epidermidis, 0.5/0.015 to 4 for methicillin-susceptible staphylococci and 2/0.12 to 2 for methicillin-resistant staphylococci; Streptococcus pneumoniae, 0.015/ or = 512; Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2/ or = 512; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 32/ or = 512; Acinetobacter baumannii, 1/0.12 to 16).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                Drug Des Devel Ther
                Drug Design, Development and Therapy
                Drug Design, Development and Therapy
                Dove Medical Press
                1177-8881
                2016
                20 January 2016
                : 10
                : 357-370
                Affiliations
                [1 ]State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Department of Pharmacy, The First Hospital Affiliated to Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]Department of Pharmacy, The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, People’s Republic of China
                [4 ]TaiGen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Da-fang Zhong, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 501 Haike Road, Shanghai 201203, People’s Republic of China, Tel/fax +86 21 5080 0738, Email dfzhong@ 123456simm.ac.cn
                Article
                dddt-10-357
                10.2147/DDDT.S95934
                4725632
                26855561
                84bab57a-213c-4f09-9067-96ee0ed0d6cc
                © 2016 Zhang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                nemonoxacin,probenecid,cimetidine,clinical pharmacokinetics,drug–drug interaction

                Comments

                Comment on this article