4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Are individuals with cardiovascular disease at risk of COVID-19-related mental health problems or individuals with cardiovascular disease at risk of cardiovascular disease-related mental health problems during COVID-19? A Psychological-Psychiatric Perspective

      letter
      a , *
      Medical Hypotheses
      Elsevier Ltd.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mental health problems and heart diseases (cardiovascular diseases CVDs) are one of the leading sources of morbidity and mortality across the world [1], [2]. Pervious research has found that individuals with heart problems are more likely to experience depression which is associated with the two-fold or greater risk of cardiovascular mortality [3], [4]. Multitude of bio-behavioral mechanisms has been associated with health-related behaviors, behavioral risk behaviors, impairment in autonomic nervous system functioning, increased proinflammatory cytokines, and platelet activation [5], [6], [7]. Many researches have found that mood, anxiety disorders, and stress occurred among individuals with heart disease at higher rates than among individuals with the comparable age and gender in the absence of heart disease. There is a decade of researches speculating whether psychological disorders are a cause or consequence of heart disease [8]. Although, the struggle to find the precise nature of these links is underdeveloped, yet the proposed discussion on the state-of-the-art structure of the epidemiology and pathophysiological aspects of possible bi-directional relation between mental illness and heart problems with an understanding of possible causal relationship between heart problems and psychological illness among the diverse cultural contexts, linguistic differences, socioeconomic status of individuals, low and middle income countries (lmics), and prevalence (predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating) mental illnesses exists [8]. There is a high possibility of prevalence of mental disease in individuals with cardiovascular problems and conversely, individuals with mental health problems seems to have an increased risk of cardiovascular problems – including common pathophysiological, epidemiological and pathophysiological mechanisms between mental illness and heart disease. Coronary artery disease or ischemic heart disease (CHD) is a term for the buildup plaque in the heart’s arteries, leading to the failure of coronary circulation to cardiac muscle and surrounding tissue which results in myocardial infarction (MI) [9], [10]. Some of the risk factors include dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, diabetes, obesity, substance use (smoking, alcohol consumption, drugs), sedentary lifestyle (diet higher in calories, saturated fat, and cholesterol, decreased compliance and adherence to medication intake, and high physical inactivity) stress and old age [11] – a perfect recipe under the global pandemic outbreak and quarantine policy for individuals with heart problems who are also at risk/existing mental health problems. Mental illness is also one of major contributor to the global burden of diseases [12], [13] as more than 300million people suffer from depression worldwide and 14.3% deaths [14], [15] each year are attributed to mental illness. Mental illness and psychological distress are two highly prevalent common terms used to describe the current situation, experience, and symptoms in a person’s life during the pandemic COVID-19 outbreak. A wide range of mental health problems and unprecedented life situations during the coronavirus outbreak including bereavement, grief, stress, loss of a job, sleep problems, violence, abuse, accidents, trauma and health threat can induce psychological distress or exacerbate pre-existing physical and mental health problems – acting as a contributor to or resulting from the cardiovascular disease [16]. The prevalence of mental health problems with heart disease is threefold higher than the general population and there is about 80% increase in the risk of developing new or exacerbation of pre-existing cardiovascular disease [17] (complications or hospitalization) during a perceived or actual threatening or stressful situation such as the advent of COVID-19 [18], [19]. The prevalence of depression and anxiety is seen more common among individuals with angina, at risk of developing myocardial infarction, stroke, and atrial fibrillation, the bi-directional relationship in other words states that, mental health problems can increase the risk of developing cardiovascular disease; cardiovascular disease can increase the risk of developing mental health problems [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. General anxiety, psychological distress, anger, negative emotions, fear, worry, grief, severe emotional stress [20] can result in the release of the hormone adrenaline temporarily increasing blood pressure and constricting arteries resulted in myocardial infarction (or the ‘broken heart syndrome’) which have been shown to precipitate and perpetuate cardiovascular diseases [20], [21]. The psychological impact of COVID-19 related quarantine includes post-traumatic stress disorder, confusion and frustration [22]. Such major pandemic outbreak are showing negative effects on psychological health of individuals and society, for instance, psychological issues, mental distress, grief and bereavement, deliberate or unintentional harm to family, loss/separation from family, self-injury, shame, guilt, helplessness, posttraumatic stress symptoms, addiction or substance use, medical mistrust and inclination towards conspiracies, panic attacks, stress, anxiety, depression, loneliness, suicidal ideation, mood problems, sleep problems, worry, denial, boredom, ambivalence, uncertainty, frustration, anger, fear, stigmatization, marginalization, xenophobia, mass hysteria, socio-economic status, and other mental health concerns would require pre-established coalition to mobilize resources for effective intervention, management and preventive measures for affected individuals. [23], [24], [25], [26]. Mental health problems can occur or aggravate or trigger psychological and emotional distress in self-isolated and quarantined individuals [27]. Empirical findings are salient features at this state of COVID-19 outbreak – addressing the individuals with cardiovascular disease regarding health risks and perceived threats; reiterating mental health concerns predispose to fixation on the stressful cognitive patterns; and encouraging lifestyle modification and motivate behavior change helps stress appraisal and coping strategies [18]. Medication as well as non-medication interventions including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness meditation, transcendental meditation, spiritual/religious meditation, physical activity staying, breathing exercise, could dramatically increase the efficacy of interventions and quality of life. The goal of cultivating resilience, coping, mindfulness and healthy adjustment with the change of lifestyle behavioral modification and mental wellbeing will bring the immediate the focal of attention towards physical sensation (heart) and emotions and thoughts (mental health) by contributing to a more coherent and healthy sense of self and identity while living through the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Depression in heart failure a meta-analytic review of prevalence, intervention effects, and associations with clinical outcomes.

          This article describes a meta-analysis of published associations between depression and heart failure (HF) in regard to 3 questions: 1) What is the prevalence of depression among patients with HF? 2) What is the magnitude of the relationship between depression and clinical outcomes in the HF population? 3) What is the evidence for treatment effectiveness in reducing depression in HF patients? Key word searches of the Medline and PsycInfo databases, as well as reference searches in published HF and depression articles, identified 36 publications meeting our criteria. Clinically significant depression was present in 21.5% of HF patients, and varied by the use of questionnaires versus diagnostic interview (33.6% and 19.3%, respectively) and New York Heart Association-defined HF severity (11% in class I vs. 42% in class IV), among other factors. Combined results suggested higher rates of death and secondary events (risk ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.6), trends toward increased health care use, and higher rates of hospitalization and emergency room visits among depressed patients. Treatment studies generally relied on small samples, but also suggested depression symptom reductions from a variety of interventions. In sum, clinically significant depression is present in at least 1 in 5 patients with HF; however, depression rates can be much higher among patients screened with questionnaires or with more advanced HF. The relationship between depression and poorer HF outcomes is consistent and strong across multiple end points. These findings reinforce the importance of psychosocial research in HF populations and identify a number of areas for future study.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Randomized Trial.

            Depression and low perceived social support (LPSS) after myocardial infarction (MI) are associated with higher morbidity and mortality, but little is known about whether this excess risk can be reduced through treatment. To determine whether mortality and recurrent infarction are reduced by treatment of depression and LPSS with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), supplemented with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant when indicated, in patients enrolled within 28 days after MI. Randomized clinical trial conducted from October 1996 to April 2001 in 2481 MI patients (1084 women, 1397 men) enrolled from 8 clinical centers. Major or minor depression was diagnosed by modified Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria and severity by the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD); LPSS was determined by the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Social Support Instrument (ESSI). Random allocation was to usual medical care or CBT-based psychosocial intervention. Cognitive behavior therapy was initiated at a median of 17 days after the index MI for a median of 11 individual sessions throughout 6 months, plus group therapy when feasible, with SSRIs for patients scoring higher than 24 on the HRSD or having a less than 50% reduction in Beck Depression Inventory scores after 5 weeks. Composite primary end point of death or recurrent MI; secondary outcomes included change in HRSD (for depression) or ESSI scores (for LPSS) at 6 months. Improvement in psychosocial outcomes at 6 months favored treatment: mean (SD) change in HRSD score, -10.1 (7.8) in the depression and psychosocial intervention group vs -8.4 (7.7) in the depression and usual care group (P<.001); mean (SD) change in ESSI score, 5.1 (5.9) in the LPSS and psychosocial intervention group vs 3.4 (6.0) in the LPSS and usual care group (P<.001). After an average follow-up of 29 months, there was no significant difference in event-free survival between usual care (75.9%) and psychosocial intervention (75.8%). There were also no differences in survival between the psychosocial intervention and usual care arms in any of the 3 psychosocial risk groups (depression, LPSS, and depression and LPSS patients). The intervention did not increase event-free survival. The intervention improved depression and social isolation, although the relative improvement in the psychosocial intervention group compared with the usual care group was less than expected due to substantial improvement in usual care patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mood disorders in the medically ill: scientific review and recommendations.

              The purpose of this review is to assess the relationship between mood disorders and development, course, and associated morbidity and mortality of selected medical illnesses, review evidence for treatment, and determine needs in clinical practice and research. Data were culled from the 2002 Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance Conference proceedings and a literature review addressing prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. This review also considered the experience of primary and specialty care providers, policy analysts, and patient advocates. The review and recommendations reflect the expert opinion of the authors. Reviews of epidemiology and mechanistic studies were included, as were open-label and randomized, controlled trials on treatment of depression in patients with medical comorbidities. Data on study design, population, and results were extracted for review of evidence that includes tables of prevalence and pharmacological treatment. The effect of depression and bipolar disorder on selected medical comorbidities was assessed, and recommendations for practice, research, and policy were developed. A growing body of evidence suggests that biological mechanisms underlie a bidirectional link between mood disorders and many medical illnesses. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that mood disorders affect the course of medical illnesses. Further prospective studies are warranted.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Med Hypotheses
                Med. Hypotheses
                Medical Hypotheses
                Elsevier Ltd.
                0306-9877
                1532-2777
                30 May 2020
                30 May 2020
                : 109919
                Affiliations
                [a ]Counselling Psychologist, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. sonia.mukhtar12@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0306-9877(20)31191-9 109919
                10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109919
                7261099
                84bec75c-0e47-40f2-8cc8-f5d1de80046f
                © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 7 May 2020
                : 28 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article