0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Objective Assessment of Treatment Response in Hirsutism

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A simple photographic technique was used to assess the objective response of hirsute women to treatment with cyproterone acetate (CA). The skin in front of the left ear was shaved and photographs taken immediately and after 1 week, and hair growth per week estimated by averaging the length of 20 hairs in the magnified photographs. The precision, repeatability and patient acceptance of the method were found to be satisfactory. Basal hair growth rates were 2.28 ± 0.4 mm/week (mean ± SD, n = 34) and showed a significant correlation with hirsutism scores derived from a standard physician-rated scale. During therapy with CA the mean ( ± SD) improvement in hair growth rate was 19 ± 13%, whereas physician-rated hirsutism scores improved by 33 ± 20%. The reduction in hair growth rate showed no significant correlation with improvement assessed using subjective rating by either physician or patient. The greater improvement in physician-rated scores compared with hair growth rate assessment suggests that hair shaft width, colour and other factors may be as important as hair length when assessing treatment response.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          HRE
          Horm Res Paediatr
          10.1159/issn.1663-2818
          Hormone Research in Paediatrics
          S. Karger AG
          1663-2818
          1663-2826
          1985
          1985
          28 November 2008
          : 22
          : 4
          : 253-259
          Affiliations
          Department of Endocrinology and Medical Photography, Auckland Hospital, and Post Graduate School of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Womens Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
          Article
          180103 Horm Res 1985;22:253–259
          10.1159/000180103
          2934310
          © 1985 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 7
          Categories
          Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article