3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rationale and proposed framework for shared decision making in cardio-oncology

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Physicians have a duty to present diagnostic and therapeutic choices with rational guidance that respects patient values and realizes patient goals. In cardio-oncology, we commonly encounter patients who understandably feel overwhelmed or feel that they have no favorable options, particularly in the context of advanced malignancy. Accordingly, a longitudinal multidisciplinary commitment to shared decision making (SDM) ensures that physicians and patients actively participate in this process to promote the best possible outcomes from the patient perspective. We propose a practical framework for approaching these difficult decisions in cardio-oncology drawing upon our experience in clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper.

              Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the primary tool for noninvasive assessment of myocardial inflammation in patients with suspected myocarditis. The International Consensus Group on CMR Diagnosis of Myocarditis was founded in 2006 to achieve consensus among CMR experts and develop recommendations on the current state-of-the-art use of CMR for myocarditis. The recommendations include indications for CMR in patients with suspected myocarditis, CMR protocol standards, terminology for reporting CMR findings, and diagnostic CMR criteria for myocarditis (i.e., "Lake Louise Criteria").
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sarah.hull@yale.edu
                aaron.soufer@gmail.com
                erica.spatz@yale.edu
                lauren.baldassarre@yale.edu
                Journal
                Cardiooncology
                Cardiooncology
                Cardio-oncology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2057-3804
                23 August 2021
                23 August 2021
                2021
                : 7
                : 30
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.47100.32, ISNI 0000000419368710, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, , Yale School of Medicine, ; 20 York Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.47100.32, ISNI 0000000419368710, Program for Biomedical Ethics, , Yale School of Medicine, ; 20 York Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
                [3 ]Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-410X
                Article
                118
                10.1186/s40959-021-00118-7
                8380868
                34425913
                85266cca-aaea-41d8-b380-552a278b2bda
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 28 June 2021
                : 12 August 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000968, american heart association;
                Award ID: 18CDA34110361
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                ethics,autonomy,shared decision making
                ethics, autonomy, shared decision making

                Comments

                Comment on this article