12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Liberalismo, sanción y reproche: una revisión crítica del concepto de reproche en la teoría jurídico-penal de C. S. Nino Translated title: Liberalism, Punishment and Blame: a Critical Review of the Concept of Blame in C. S. Nino's Legal Theory

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          El trabajo persigue tres objetivos relacionados. El primero, de corte netamente hermenéutico, es rastrear y reconstruir las razones principales que habrían impulsado a C. S. Nino a rechazar la idea de reproche en su obra teórica. El segundo, de cariz más bien crítico, busca evaluar la credibilidad de estas razones, contraponiéndolas a otras que se estiman más acertadas desde el punto de vista filosófico y que, según se argüirá, habrían comenzado a formularse en la propia teoría del autor. El tercero apunta a desvincular la idea de reproche de algunas connotaciones innecesarias que se le han asociado, para que pueda ocupar un lugar más cómodo en el seno de una teoría jurídica compatible con las premisas de un Estado liberal de derecho.

          Translated abstract

          This paper has three related goals. The first one, purely hermeneutic in kind, seeks to track and reconstruct the main reasons that would have led C. S. Nino to reject the concept of 'blame' in his theory. The second goal, more critically oriented, attempts to evaluate the credibility of these reasons by contrasting them with other reasons (more philosophically convincing) that would have actually begun to develop within Nino's own theory. The third goal is to detach the concept of blame from certain connotations that have been usually associated to it, so that it can have a more appropriate place in the context of a liberal legal theory.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Derecho y razón: Teoría del garantismo penal

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ética y derechos humanos

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                is
                Isonomía
                Isonomía
                Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México; Fontamara (México, DF, Mexico )
                1405-0218
                October 2013
                : 39
                : 37-81
                Affiliations
                [01] Córdoba orgnameUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba orgdiv1Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales Argentina
                Article
                S1405-02182013000200003 S1405-0218(13)00003900003
                853db8f2-0d1e-45ac-a35b-9b21dc72c9e8

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 28 February 2013
                : 15 August 2013
                : 31 May 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 47, Pages: 45
                Product

                SciELO Mexico

                Categories
                Artículos

                autorreferencialidad,blame,liberalism,perfectionism,Nino,reproche,liberalismo,perfeccionismo,intersubjetividad,auto-referentiality,intersubjectivity,Sanción,Punishment

                Comments

                Comment on this article